Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:33:24.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PLANT-DERIVED AEROSOL-SMOKE AND SMOKE SOLUTIONS INFLUENCE AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF A TRADITIONAL CEREAL CROP, TEF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

HABTEAB GHEBREHIWOT ,
MANOJ KULKARNI ,
MICHAEL BAIRU  and
JOHANNES VAN STADEN
HABTEAB GHEBREHIWOT
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
MANOJ KULKARNI
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
MICHAEL BAIRU
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
JOHANNES VAN STADEN*
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
*
†Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The positive role of plant-derived smoke on seed germination and post-germination processes is well documented. The present study examined if plant-derived smoke with various methods of application influence the agronomic performance of a traditional cereal crop, tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Comparisons were made in potted tef plants, which germinated from seeds treated with smoke-water (1:500 dilution), Karrikinolide1 (KAR1, 10−8 M) solutions and seeds pretreated with cool aerosol-smoke for 10 min (rinsed and unrinsed afterwards). The smoke-related treatments modified a number of physiological, morphological and agronomic features of Eragrostis tef. Compared with the control, KAR1 and aerosol-smoke treatment of the seeds significantly improved plant height. All the smoke-related treatments significantly promoted stem-thickness whereas number of tillers and grain and dry biomass responded positively to aerosol-smoke and smoke-water treatments. These findings indicate that the plant-derived smoke treatment has a great potential to improve grain and dry biomass yields of tef. Moreover, due to its positive role in improving stem-thickness, smoke treatment may assist in combating lodging problems in cereals such as rice, wheat and barley, provided they are responsive to smoke treatments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 244 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aremu, A. O., Bairu, M. W., Finnie, J. F. and Van Staden, J. (2012). Stimulatory role of smoke-water and karrikinolide on the photosynthetic pigment and phenolic contents of micropropagated ‘Williams’ bananas. Plant Growth Regulation 67:271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assefa, K., Ketema, S., Tefera, H., Nguyen, H., Blum, A., Ayele, M., Bai, G., Belay, S. and Kefyalew, T. (1999). Diversity among germplasm lines of the Ethiopian cereal tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Euphytica 106:87–97.Google Scholar
Ayele, M. (1993). Use of excised-leaf water content in breeding tef [(Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] for moisture stressed areas. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 42:261–265.Google Scholar
Baxter, B., Van Staden, J., Granger, J. and Brown, N. A. C. (1994). Plant-derived smoke and smoke extracts stimulate seed germination of the fire-climax grass Themeda triandra Forssk. Environmental and Experimental Botany 34:217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, P., Griffin, J., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Scott, R., Spink, J., Baker, C. and Clare, R. (2000). Controlling plant form through husbandry to minimize lodging in wheat. Field Crops Research 67:59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boardman, N. K. (1977). Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 28:355–377.Google Scholar
Brown, N. A. C. (1993). Promotion of germination of fynbos seeds by plant-derived smoke. New Phytologist 123:575–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, N. A. C. and Van Staden, J. (1999). Plant-derived smoke: an effective seed pre-soaking treatment for wildflower species and with potential for horticultural and vegetable crops. Seed Science Technology 26:669–673.Google Scholar
Chow, W., Anderson, J. and Melis, A. (1990). The photosystem stoichiometry in thylakoids of some Australian shade-adapted plant species. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 17:665–674.Google Scholar
Costanza, S., De Wet, J. and Harlan, J. (1980). Literature review and numerical taxonomy of Eragrostis tef (T'ef). Economic Botany 334:413–424.Google Scholar
D'Andrea, A. C. (2008). T'ef (Eragrostis tef) in ancient agricultural systems of highland Ethiopia. Economic Botany 62:547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lange, J. H., and Boucher, C. (1990). Autecological studies on Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). I. Plant-derived smoke as a seed germination cue. South African Journal of Botany 56:700–703.Google Scholar
Erkossa, T. and Teklewold, H. (2009). Agronomic and economic efficiency of manure and urea fertilizers use on vertisols in Ethiopian highlands. Agricultural Sciences in China 8:352–360.Google Scholar
Gezahegn, A. and Tekalign, M. (1995). Determinants of demand for fertilizer in a Vertisol cropping system in Ethiopia. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 72:165–169.Google Scholar
Ghebrehiwot, H. M., Kulkarni, M. G., Kirkman, K. P. and Van Staden, J. (2008). Smoke water and a smoke-isolated butenolide improve germination and seedling vigor of Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter under high temperature and low osmotic potential. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 194:270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs-Russell, G. E., Watson, L., Koekemoer, M., Smook, L., Barker, N. P., Anderson, H. M. and Dallwitz, M. J. (1990). Grasses of Southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa, No. 58. Pretoria, South Africa: National Botanic Gardens/Botanical Research Institute, p. 58.Google Scholar
Hendry, G. A. and Price, A. H. (1993). Stress indicators: chlorophylls and carotenoids. In Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology, 148–152 (Eds Hendry, G. A. F. and Grime, J. P.). London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundera, F., Nelson, L. A., Baenziger, P. S., Bechere, E. and Tefera, H. (2000). Association of lodging and some morpho-agronomic traits in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Tropical Agriculture 77:169–173.Google Scholar
Kashiwagi, T., Togawa, E., Hirotsu, N. and Ishimaru, K. (2008). Improvement of lodging resistance with QTLs for stem diameter in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117:749–757.Google Scholar
Ketema, S. (1993). Tef (Eragrostis tef): Breeding, Genetic Resources, Agronomy, Utilization and Role in Ethiopian Agriculture. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Institute of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Ketema, S. (1997). Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter.]. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops, Vol. 12. Rome, Italy: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, M. G., Ascough, G. D. and Van Staden, J. (2007). Effects of foliar applications of smoke-water and a smoke-isolated butenolide on seedling growth of okra and tomato. HortScience 42:179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, M. G., Ascough, G. D. and Van Staden, J. (2008). Smoke-water and a smoke-isolated butenolide improve growth and yield of tomatoes under greenhouse conditions. HortTechnology 18:449–454.Google Scholar
Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In Methods in Enzymology, 350–382 (Eds Douce, R. and Packer, L.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Light, M. E., Daws, M. I. and Van Staden, J. (2009). Smoke-derived butenolide: towards understanding its biological effects. South African Journal of Botany 75:1–7.Google Scholar
Light, M. E., Gardner, M. J., Jäger, A. K. and Van Staden, J. (2002). Dual regulation of seed germination by smoke solutions. Plant Growth Regulation 37:135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, B. L., Morrison, M. J. and Voldeng, H. D. (1995). Leaf greenness and photosynthetic rates in soybean. Crop Science 35:1411–1414.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1996). Lost crops of Africa, vol. I, Grains, 215–235. National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Pinthus, M. J. (1973). Lodging in wheat, barley and oats: the phenomenon, its causes and preventative measures. Advances in Agronomy 2:209–263.Google Scholar
Purseglove, J. W. (1972). Tropical monocotyledons I. London: William Clowes.Google Scholar
Sparg, S. G., Kulkarni, M. G. and Van Staden, J. (2006). Aerosol-smoke and smoke-water stimulation of seedling vigor of a commercial maize cultivar. Crop Science 46:1336–1340.Google Scholar
Takele, A. (2001). Canopy temperatures and excised leaf water loss of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] cultivar under water deficit conditions at anthesis. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 49:109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teklu, Y. and Tefera, H. (2005). Genetic improvement in grain yield potential and associated agronomic traits of tef (Eragrostis tef). Euphytica 141:247–254.Google Scholar
Torres Netto, A. T., Campostrini, E., De Oliveira, J. G. and Bressan-Smith, R. E. (2005). Photosynthetic pigments, nitrogen, chlorophyll fluorescence and SPAD-502 readings in coffee leaves. Scientia Horticulturae 104:199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, S. C., Sayre, K. D., Kaul, J. N. and Narang, R. S. (2003). Growth and morphology of spring wheat culm and their association with lodging: effects of genotype, N levels and ethephon. Field Crops Research 84:271–290.Google Scholar
Van Staden, J., Brown, N. A. C., Jäger, A. K. and Johnson, T. A. (2000). Smoke as a germination cue. Plant Species Biology 15:167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Staden, J., Jäger, A. K., Light, M. E. and Burger, B. V. (2004). Isolation of the major germination cue from plant-derived smoke. South African Journal of Botany 70:654–659.Google Scholar
Van Staden, J., Sparg, S. G., Kulkarni, M. G. and Light, M. E. (2006). Post-germination effects of the smoke-derived compound 3-methyl-2H-furo[2,3-c]pyran-2-one, and its potential as a preconditioning agent. Field Crops Research 98:98–105.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1947). Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Annals of Botany 11:41–76.Google Scholar
Yu, J. K., Graznak, E., Breseghello, F., Tefera, H. and Sorrells, M. E. (2007). QTL mapping of agronomic traits in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc) Trotter]. BMC Plant Biology 7:30.Google Scholar
Zeid, M., Belay, G., Mulkey, S., Poland, J. and Sorrells, M. E. (2011). QTL mapping for yield and lodging resistance in an enhanced SSR-based map for tef. Theoretical and Applied Geneticas 122:77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuber, U., Winzeler, H., Messmer, M. M., Keller, B., Schmid, J. E. and Stamp, P. (1999). Morphological traits associated with lodging resistance of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 182:17–24.Google Scholar