Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T20:27:10.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical Measurements in Crop Physiology II. Water Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

G. R. Squire
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Department of Physiology and Environmental Studies, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
C. R. Black
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Department of Physiology and Environmental Studies, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
P. J. Gregory
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Department of Physiology and Environmental Studies, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK

Summary

Instruments and techniques are reviewed for measuring the content and potential of water in the soil, the water potential and solute potential of plant tissue, and the diffusive resistance of leaves. Emphasis is placed on difficulties encountered in the field and in the interpretation of measurements. References are given to recent technical papers and reviews dealing with the principles and construction of individual instruments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baughn, J. W. & Tanner, C. B. (1976 a). Leaf water potential: comparison of pressure chamber and in situ hygrometer … Crop Science 16:181184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baughn, J. W. & Tanner, C. B. (1976b). Excision effects on leaf water potential of five herbaceous species. Crop Science 16:184190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsell, M. F., Jarvis, P. G. & Davidson, B. (1972). A null-balance diffusion porometer suitable for use with leaves of many shapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 9:677690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. P. (1973). Neutron Probe Practice. Report 19, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Boyer, J. S. (1974). Water transport in plants: mechanism of apparent changes in resistance during absorption. Planta 117:187207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. W. (1970). Measurements of water potential with thermocouple psychrometers: construction and application. Forest Service Research Paper INT 80, US Department of Agriculture.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, F. J. & Milthorpe, F. L. (1976). Stomatal conductance in the control of gas exchange. In Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Volume IV (Ed. Kozlowski, T. T.) 103152. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. S. (1979). Improved thermocouple psychrometers for measurement of soil water potential in a temperature gradient. Journal of Physics E, Scientific Instrumentation 12:739743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, G. S. & Campbell, M. D. (1974). Evaluation of a thermocouple hygrometer for measuring leaf water potential in situ. Agronomy Journal 66:2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, E. C., Campbell, G. S. & Barlow, W. K. (1973). A dewpoint hygrometer for water potential measurement. Agricultural Meteorology 12:113121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, J. M., Shahan, K. W. & Steponkus, P. L. (1979). Characterisation of internal water relations of rice by a pressure-volume method. Crop Science 19:681685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, W. (1977). A direct reading continuous flow porometer. Agricultural Meteorology 18:8189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. R. & Kirkham, D. (1952). Determination of soil moisture by neutron scattering. Soil Science 73:391401.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Water relations of winter wheat. 2. Soil water relations. Journal of Agricultural Science 91:103116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, G. J. & Hall, A. E. (1976). Performance of the silver-foil psychrometer for measuring leaf water potential in situ. Agronomy Journal 68:872875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, G. J. & Rawlins, S. L. (1972). Silver-foil psychrometer for measuring leaf water potential in situ. Science 177:802803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D. A. (1978). Environmental effects on turgor pressure response in range grasses. Crop Science 18:945948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. A. & Brown, R. W. (1977). Psychrometric analysis of turgor pressure response … Crop Science 17:507510.Google Scholar
Kanemasu, E. T., Stone, L. R. & Powers, W. L. (1976). Evapotranspiration model tested for soybean and sorghum. Agronomy Journal 68:569572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körner, C. & Cernusca, A. (1976). A semi-automatic, recording diffusion porometer … Photosynthetica 10:172181.Google Scholar
Körner, C. & De Moraes, J. A. P. V. (1979). Water potential and diffusion resistance in alpine cushion plants … Oecologia Plantarum 14:109120.Google Scholar
Long, I. F. & French, B. K. (1967). Measurement of soil moisture in the field by neutron moderation. Journal of Soil Science 18:149166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnicol, P. K. (1976). Rapid metabolic changes in the wounding response of leaf discs following excision. Plant Physiology 57:8084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, M. (1974). Depths of water extraction by roots … In Isotope and Radiation Techniques in Soil Physics and Irrigation Studies, 435445. Vienna: I.A.E.A.Google Scholar
McGowan, M. & Williams, J. B. (1980). The water relations of an agricultural catchment. I. Estimation of evaporation from soil water records. Journal of Soil Science 31:218230.Google Scholar
Millar, B. D. (1971). Improved thermocouple psychrometer for the measurement of plant and soil water potential. I. … instrument design. Journal of Experimental Botany 22:875890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, B. D. (1974). Improved thermocouple psychrometer for the measurement of plant and soil water potential. I. … instrument design. Journal of Experimental Botany 25:10701084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, B. D. & Hansen, G. K. (1975). Exclusion errors in pressure chamber estimates of leaf water potential. Annals of Botany 39:915920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1981). Evaporation and surface temperature. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 107:127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L. & Bull, T. A. (1970). A diffusive resistance porometer for field use. II. Theory, calibration and performance. Journal of Applied Ecology 7:623638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L., Gregory, P. J., Marshall, B., Ong, C. K., Saffell, R. A. & Squire, G. R. (1981). Physical measurements in crop physiology. I. Growth and gas exchange. Experimental Agriculture 17:113126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, H. H. & Thurtell, G. W. (1972). A Peltier cooled thermocouple dewpoint hygrometer for in situ measurements of water potentials. In Psychrometry in Water Relations Research (Eds Brown, R. W. & Van Haveren, B. P.) 103112. Logan: Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Logan, Utah.Google Scholar
Neumann, H. H., Thurtell, G. W., Stevenson, K. R. & Beadle, C. L. (1974). Leaf water content and potential in corn, sorghum, soybean and sunflower. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 54:185195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, K. J. & Legg, B. J. (1972). A continuous flow porometer. Journal of Applied Ecology 9:669675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pospisilova, J. & Solarova, J. (1980). Environmental and biological control of diffusive conductances … Photosynthetica 14:90127.Google Scholar
Powell, D. B. B. & Blanchard, T. W. (1976). The quantitative analysis of water potential/symplastic water volume curves. Journal of Experimental Botany 27:597607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlins, S. L. & Dalton, F. N. (1967). Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 31:297301.Google Scholar
Ritchie, G. A. & Hinckley, T. M. (1975). The pressure chamber as an instrument for ecological research. Advances in Ecological Research 9:165254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuttleworth, W. J. (1979). Evaporation. Report 56, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Squire, G. R. & Black, C. R. (1981). Stomatal behaviour in the field. In Stomatal Physiology (Eds Mansfield, T. A. & Jarvis, P. G.). Cambridge University Press (in press).Google Scholar
Stigter, C. J. (1972). Leaf diffusion resistance to water vapour and its direct measurement. I. Introduction and review … Mededelingen van de Landbouwhogeschool te Wageningen 72–3:147.Google Scholar
Stigter, C. J. & Lammers, B. (1974). Leaf diffusion resistance to water vapour and its direct measurement. III. … improved diffusion porometer in growth rooms and fields of Indian corn. Mededelingen van de Landbouwhogeschool te Wageningen 74–21:1–76.Google Scholar
Stiles, W. (1970). A diffusive resistance porometer for field use. I. Construction. Journal of Applied Ecology 7:617622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szeicz, G., Van Bavel, C. H. M. & Takami, S. (1973). Stomatal factor in the water-use and dry matter production of sorghum. Agricultural Meteorology 12: 361389.Google Scholar
Tyree, M. T. & Hammel, H. T. (1972). The measurement of turgor pressure and water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique. Journal of Experimental Botany 23:267282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyree, M. T., Dainty, J. & Benis, M., (1973). The water relations of hemlock (Tsuga canadensis). L. … measured by the pressure-bomb technique. Canadian Journal of Botany 51:14711480.Google Scholar
Tyree, M. T., MacGregor, M. E., Petgou, A. & Upenieks, M. I. (1978). A comparison of systematic errors between the Richards and Hammel methods … Canadian Journal of Botany 56:21532161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valancogne, C. & Daudet, F. A. (1974). Annales Agronomiques 25:733751.Google Scholar
Waring, R. H. & Cleary, B. D. (1967). Plant moisture stress: evaluation by pressure-bomb. Science 155: 12481254.Google Scholar
Webster, R. (1966). The measurement of soil water tension in the field. New Phytologist 65:249258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenkert, W., Lemon, E. R. & Sinclair, T. R. (1978a). Changes in water potential during pressure-bomb measurement. Agronomy Journal 70:353355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenkert, W., Lemon, E. R. & Sinclair, T. R. (1978b). Water content-potential relations in soya bean: … under field conditions. Annals of Botany 42:295307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebe, H. H., Campbell, G. S., Gardner, W. H., Rawlins, S. L., Cary, J. W. & Brown, R. W. (1971). Measurement of Plant and Soil Water Status. Bulletin 484, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Logan.Google Scholar
Williams, J. B. (1979). Soil water investigation in The Gambia. Technical Bulletin 3, Land Resources Development Centre, Ministry of Overseas Development, UK.Google Scholar