Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T08:00:44.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of Triticale in Comparison with Barley and Wheat in a Semi-Arid Mediterranean Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

A. Hadjichristodoulou
A. Hadjichristodoulou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eight triticale lines were evaluated in Cyprus during the period 1977–82 and compared with the best other cereal varieties grown locally. One triticale line was selected which outyielded Athenais barley by 8.3% and Pitic 62 aestivum wheat by 11.4% in drylands, and durum and aestivum wheat by 20% in irrigated areas. Regression analysis showed that Athenais was the best yielding crop in the least productive environments while under medium or favourable conditions triticale gave maximum yields. Number of grains per spike, harvest index and the N content of grain were larger but ear number, 1000-grain weight and N content of straw were smaller in triticale than in barley. The yield component most sensitive to drought was 1000-grain weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 41 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1978). Triticale. CIMMYT Review for 1978. pp. 76–83. Mexico.Google Scholar
Anon. (1981a). Cereal crops improvement. ICARDA Annual Report for 1981. pp. 40–83. Syria.Google Scholar
Anon. (1981b). Triticale. CIMMYT Review for 1981. pp. 56–59. Mexico.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982). Triticale. CIMMYT Review for 1982. pp. 71–77. Mexico.Google Scholar
Bishoni, U. R. & Hughes, J. L. (1979). Agronomic performance and protein content of fall planted triticale, wheat and rye. Agronomy Journal 71:359–360.Google Scholar
Brown, A. R. & Almodares, A. (1976). Quantity and quality of triticale forage compared to other small grains. Agronomy Journal 68:264–266.Google Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14:742–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1981). Optimizing the use of water and nitrogen through breeding of crops. In Soils, Water and Nitrogen in Mediterranean-type Environments, 249–278. (Eds Monteith, J. & Webb, C.). The Hague: Nijhoff-Junk.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. & Wood, J. T. (1979). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. III. Yield associations with morpho-physiological traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30:1001–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1974). Comparative study of yield and quality of grain cereals under rainfed conditions. Technical Bulletin 15, Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1976). Effects of genotype and rainfall on yield and quality of forage barley and wheat varieties in a semi-arid region. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87:489–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1977). Effects of genotype and rainfall on forage oats in a semi-arid region. Experimental Agriculture 13:217–223.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1981). Cereal diseases in Cyprus-Control strategies. Technical Bulletin No. 38. Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1982). The effects of annual precipitation and its distribution on grain yield of dryland cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99:261–270.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A., Josephides, C. & Della, A. (1980). Improvement of grain barley varieties in Cyprus-Kantara, a new variety. Technical Bulletin No. 32, Cyprus Agricultural Research Institute, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A., Josephides, C. & Karis, A. (1982). Performance of the new durum wheat variety ‘Mesaoria’ under rainfed conditions. Technical Bulletin 41, Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, 11pp.Google Scholar
Hulse, J. H. & Laing, E. M. (1974). Nutritive Value of Triticale Protein. Ottawa, Canada: IDRC.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, C.J., Elliot, F. C. & Penner, D. (1977). Protein quality of triticale. II. Prediction of protein efficiency indices through chemical analyses. Crop Science 17:269–272.Google Scholar
Larter, E. N., Kaltsikes, P. J. & McGinnis, R. C. (1971). Effect of date and rate of seeding on the performance of triticale in comparison to wheat. Crop Science 11:593–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlan, J. M. & Campbell, J. A. (1974). Methodology for evaluation of plant proteins for human use. In Nutritive Value of Triticale Protein, 27–39. (Eds Hulse, J. H. & Laing, E. M.). Ottawa, Canada: IDRC.Google Scholar
Morey, D. D. (1979). Performance of triticale in comparison with wheat, oats, barley and rye. Agronomy Journal 11:98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, L. (1972). Improvement of nutritional value in cereals. Hereditas 72:1–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muntzing, A. (1974). Historical review of the development of triticale. In Triticale, 13–30. (Eds MacIntyre, R. & Campbell, M.). Ottawa, Canada: IDRC.Google Scholar
Oplinger, E. S. & Youngs, V. L. (1975). Performance of spring sown triticale, oats, barley and wheat. Agronomy Journal 67:724–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, G. S. & Singh, P. P. (1972). Interrelationship of quantitative traits with grain yield in triticale. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 42:281–285.Google Scholar
Srivastava, J. P. (1974). Prospects of triticale as a commercial crop in India. In Triticale, 87–92. (Eds Maclntyre, R. & Campbell, M.). Ottawa, Canada: IDRC.Google Scholar
Zillinsky, F. J. (1974). The triticale improvement programme of CIMMYT. In Triticale, 81–85. (Eds Maclntyre, R. & Campbell, M.). Ottawa, Canada: IDRC.Google Scholar