Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:04:02.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PARTICIPATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF RICE PARBOILING VIDEOS WITH WOMEN IN BENIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2012

ESPÉRANCE ZOSSOU ,
PAUL VAN MELE ,
JONAS WANVOEKE  and
PHILIPPE LEBAILLY
ESPÉRANCE ZOSSOU*
Affiliation:
Gembloux Agro-Bio-Tech, Liège University, Wallonia, Belgium Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2031, Cotonou, Benin
PAUL VAN MELE
Affiliation:
Previously with Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2031, Cotonou, Benin
JONAS WANVOEKE
Affiliation:
Previously with Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2031, Cotonou, Benin
PHILIPPE LEBAILLY
Affiliation:
Gembloux Agro-Bio-Tech, Liège University, Wallonia, Belgium
*
§Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Using the sustainable livelihoods framework to evaluate the impact of a farmer-to-farmer video on the improved rice parboiling technology, women in Benin rated financial, social, human, natural and physical capital stocks for the baseline year (2006) and the impact year (2009) on a 0–5 scale. Women who had watched the video and those who had not, but who lived in the same villages, perceived a significant improvement in four out of five livelihood capitals while processors in control villages did not perceive any significant change. Apart from testing the sustainable livelihoods conceptual framework as a participatory impact assessment tool for video-mediated rural learning, this study shows how farmer-to-farmer training videos helped to improve multiple livelihood assets.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 438 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AfricaRice (2005). Cashing in with Parboiled Rice. Video. Cotonou, Benin: Africa Rice Center (WARDA). Available from: http://www.africarice.org/warda/guide-video.asp. [Accessed 10 September 2009].Google Scholar
Bentley, J. W. (2009). Impact of IPM extension for smallholder farmers in the tropics. In Integrated Pest Management. Dissemination and Impact 2, 333–346 (Eds Peshin, R. and Dhawan, A. K.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, J. W., Priou, S., Aley, P., Correa, J., Torres, R., Equise, H., Quiruchi, J. L. and Barea, O. (2006). Method, creativity and CIALs. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 5:90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, B. L., Sillito, S. D. and Baumann, M. R. (2007). Collective estimation: accuracy, expertise, and extroversion as sources of intra-group influence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103;121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, A. R., Thiele, G. and Fernandez, M. (July 2000). Farmer field schools and local agricultural research committees: complementary platforms for integrated decision-making in sustainable agriculture. AgREN Network Paper 105, the UK Department for International Development, London, UK.Google Scholar
Carney, D. (January, 1999). Approaches to sustainable livelihoods for the rural poor. ODI Poverty Briefing 2, Overseas Development Institute, London, UK. Available from: http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/download/2276.pdf [Accessed 11 October, 2011.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. and Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods. Concepts for the 21st Century. Sussex, UK: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Cho, K. M. and Boland, H. (2002). Participatory learning for agricultural extension and future development in myanmar, Institute of Rural Sociology and Extension, University of Giessen, Germany. Available online from: http://www.tropentag.de/2002/abstracts/full/302.pdf [Accessed 15 August 2010].Google Scholar
Chowdhury, A. H., Van Mele, P. and Hauser, M. (2011). Contribution of farmer-to-farmer video to capital assets building: evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35:408–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwall, A. and Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research. Social Science & Medicine 41:1667–1676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demont, M., Zossou, E., Rutsaert, P., Ndour, M., Van Mele, P. and Verbeke, W. (2012). Consumer valuation of improved rice parboiling technologies in Benin. Food Quality and Preference 23:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diop, A., Hounhouigan, D. and Kossou, K. D. (1997). Manuel de Référence Pour Technicien Spécialisés: Technologie Post-Récolte et Commercialisation des Produits Vivriers. Québec, Canada: ADA Experts-Conseils, 89–109.Google Scholar
FAO (1998). Physical Activity: Impact of Protein and Amino Metabolism and Implication for Nutritional Requirements. World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Report, Ser. No 522. Geneva, Switzerland: WHOGoogle Scholar
Fofana, M., Wanvoeke, J., Manful, J., Futakuchi, K., Van Mele, P., Zossou, E. and Bléoussi, T. M. R. (2011). Effect of improved parboiling methods on the physical and cooked grain characteristics of rice varieties in Benin. International Food Research Journal 18:697–703.Google Scholar
Haan de, A., Drinkwater, M., Rakodi, C. and Westley, K. (2002). Methods for Understanding Urban Poverty and Livelihoods. Available from: http://www.livelihoods.org/info/docs/urb_pov2.pdf [Accessed 11 October 2011].Google Scholar
Hall, A. J., Sivamohan, M. V. K., Clark, N., Taylor, S. and Bockett, G. (2001). Why research partnerships really matter: innovation theory, institutional arrangements and implications for developing new technology for the poor. World Development 29:783–797.Google Scholar
Houssou, P. and Amonsou, E. (2004). Development on improved parboiling equipment for paddy rice in Benin. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9:1019–1026.Google Scholar
Mancini, F., Van Bruggen, A. H. C. and Jiggins, J. L. S. (2007). Evaluating cotton integrated pest management (IPM) farmer field school outcomes using the sustainable livelihoods approach in India. Experimental Agriculture 43:97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera, W. M. and Zijp, W. (2002). Contracting for Agricultural Extension: International Case Studies and Emerging Practices. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72. Available from: http://www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d0001493/P1833-Sustainable-rural-livelihoods_IDS-paper72.pdf [Accessed 12 May 2011].Google Scholar
Van Mele, P. (2006). Zooming-in, zooming-out: a novel method to scale up local innovations and sustainable technologies. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 4:131–142.Google Scholar
Van Mele, P., Salahuddin, A. and Magor, N. P. (2005). People and pro-poor innovation systems. In Innovations in Rural Extension: Case Studies from Bangladesh, 257–296 (Eds Van Mele, P., Salahuddin, A. and Magor, N. P.). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Van Mele, P., Wanvoeke, J. and Zossou, E. (2010). Enhancing rural learning, linkages and institutions: the rice videos in Africa. Developpement in Practice 20;414–421.Google Scholar
Van Mele, P., Zakaria, A. K. M., Begum, H-A, Rashid, H-A and Magor, N. P. (2007). Videos that strengthen rural women's capability to innovate. Communication for Development and Social Change 1:273–293.Google Scholar
Zossou, E., Van Mele, P., Vodouhe, S. D. and Wanvoeke, J. (2009a). Comparing farmer-to-farmer video with workshops to train rural women in improved rice parboiling in central Benin. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 15:329–339.Google Scholar
Zossou, E., Van Mele, P., Vodouhe, S. D. and Wanvoeke, J. (2009b). The Power of video to trigger innovation: rice processing in central Benin. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 7:119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zossou, E., Van Mele, P., Vodouhe, S. D. and Wanvoeke, J. (2010). Women groups formed in response to public screenings of rice video in Benin. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8:270–277.Google Scholar