Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:39:46.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus) competition with grain sorghum under arid conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2020

Ali A. Bajwa Open the ORCID record for Ali A. Bajwa [Opens in a new window] ,
Ahmad Nawaz ,
Muhammad Farooq ,
Bhagirath S. Chauhan  and
Steve Adkins
Ali A. Bajwa*
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD4343, Australia The Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD4343, Australia NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, NSW2650, Australia
Ahmad Nawaz
Affiliation:
College of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Layyah, Punjab31200, Pakistan
Muhammad Farooq
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud, 123Muscat, Oman Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab38040, Pakistan The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA6009, Australia
Bhagirath S. Chauhan
Affiliation:
The Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD4343, Australia
Steve Adkins
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD4343, Australia The Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD4343, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parthenium weed is an invasive species in a growing number of countries where it infests numerous crop fields, including sorghum. Two field studies were conducted to quantify the effect of parthenium weed on the performance of grain sorghum at different weed densities (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 plants m−2) and durations of weed-crop competition (season-long weed-free, weed-free after 2, 4, 6 or 8 weeks, and season-long weedy). Our aim was to identify the density threshold and ideal duration to control parthenium weed in sorghum fields. Both field experiments were planned in a randomised complete block design each with three replications in 2016 and were repeated in 2017. Parthenium weed biomass increased significantly with increasing density and competition duration. The increasing parthenium weed density had a linear negative effect on sorghum growth, yield and yield-contributing traits. The highest yield loss, of up to 66%, was recorded at the highest parthenium weed density of 20 plants m−2 when compared to weed-free treatment. In addition, the season-long competition of this weed with sorghum caused 81% reduction in grain yield over weed-free treatment. According to our results, parthenium weed should be managed below a density of 5 plants m−2 and throughout the crop growth duration in grain sorghum fields as it can cause serious yield losses even at low densities and through strong competition at early as well as late growth stages of the crop.

Keywords

Parthenium hysterophorusSorghum bicolorWeed management
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 387 - 396
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annapurna, C. and Singh, J.S. (2003). Variation of Parthenium hysterophorus in response to soil quality: implications for invasiveness. Weed Research 43, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asif, M., Ayub, M., Tanveer, A. and Akhtar, J. (2017). Estimating yield losses and economic threshold level of Parthenium hysterophorus in forage sorghum. Planta Daninha 35, e017164158. doi:10.1590/S0100-83582017350100038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2017). Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of two Australian biotypes of Parthenium hysterophorus to different soil moisture regimes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24, 16186–16194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajwa, A.A., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2018). Germination ecology of two Australian biotypes of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) relates to their invasiveness. Weed Science 66, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Chauhan, B.S., Farooq, M., Shabbir, A. and Adkins, S.W. (2016). What do we really know about alien plant invasion? a review of the invasion mechanism of one of the world’s worst weeds. Planta 244, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajwa, A.A., Farooq, M., Nawaz, A., Yadav, L., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S. (2019a) Impact of invasive plant species on the livelihoods of farming households: Evidence from Parthenium hysterophorus invasion in rural Punjab, Pakistan. Biological Invasions 21, 3285–3304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Ullah, A., Farooq, M., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2019b). Chemical control of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) in two contrasting cultivars of rice under direct-seeded conditions. Crop Protection 117, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Ullah, A., Farooq, M., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2019c). Effect of different densities of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) on the performance of direct-seeded rice under aerobic conditions. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65, 796–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Ullah, A., Farooq, M., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S. (2019d). Competition dynamics of Parthenium hysterophorus in direct-seeded aerobic rice fields. Experimental Agriculture. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479719000292.Google Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Wang, H., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2019e). Effect of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on growth, productivity and glyphosate response of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Pest Management Science 75, 2934–2941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, R.G., Reinhardt, C.F., Foxcroft, L.C. and Hurle, K. (2007). Residue allelopathy in Parthenium hysterophorus L.-does parthenin play a leading role? Crop Protection 26, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, O.C. and Wicks, G.A. (1967). The effect of weed removal treatments on sorghum growth. Weeds 15, 204–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghani, A., Saeed, M., Hussain, D., Arshad, M., Shafique, M.M. and Shah, S.A.S. (2015). Evaluation of different sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) varieties for grain yield and related characteristics. Scientific Letters 3, 72–74.Google Scholar
Habib, N., Tahir, A. and Ain, Q. (2013). Current situation and future outlook of sorghum area and production in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 3, 283–289.Google Scholar
Hussain, N., Baloch, M.S., Yousaf, M., Naeem, M., Khakwani, A.A. and Begum, I. (2011). Performance of sorghum varieties in Potohar region. Gomal University Journal of Research 27, 26–30.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S.Z., Horak, M.J. and Vanderlip, R.L. (1997). Relative time of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) emergence is critical in pigweed-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] competition. Weed Science 45, 502–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J.W., Murray, D.S. and Westerman, R.B. (2004). Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) effects on the harvest and yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Technology 8, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T., Bajwa, A.A., Navie, S., O’Donnell, C. and Adkins, S. (2017). Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) and climate change: the effect of CO2 concentration, temperature, and water deficit on growth and reproduction of two biotypes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24, 10727–10739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safdar, M.E., Tanveer, A., Khaliq, A. and Maqbool, R. (2016). Critical competition period of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) in maize. Crop Protection 80, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safdar, M.E., Tanveer, A., Khaliq, A. and Riaz, M.A. (2015). Yield losses in maize (Zea mays) infested with parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Crop Protection 70, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, H.P., Batish, D.R., Pandher, J.K. and Kohli, R.K. (2003). Assessment of allelopathic properties of Parthenium hysterophorus residues. Agriculture Ecosystem & Environment 95, 537–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamado, T. and Milberg, P. (2000). Weed flora in arable fields of eastern Ethiopia with emphasis on the occurrence of Parthenium hysterophorus. Weed Research 40, 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamado, T., Ohlander, L. and Milberg, P. (2002). Interference by the weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. with grain sorghum: influence of weed density and duration of competition. International Journal of Pest Management 48, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timsina, B., Shrestha, B.B., Rokaya, M.B. and Münzbergová, Z. (2011). Impact of Parthenium hysterophorus L. invasion on plant species composition and soil properties of grassland communities in Nepal. Flora 206, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar