Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:48:09.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On-farm Experiments with Millet in Niger: Crop Establishment, Yield Loss Factors and Economic Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

J. Mcintire
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), PO Box 12404, Niamey, Niger
L. K. Fussell
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), PO Box 12404, Niamey, Niger

Summary

Results of farm-level experiments with pearl millet are reported from four villages in semi-arid Niger in 1982 and 1983. Crop establishment, yield loss factors (insects, diseases, striga) and economics of new practices were studied in a randomized design which included density, fertility, cultivar, and intercropping with cowpea as treatments. Improved cultivars did not establish significantly better than local ones, but fertilizer occasionally improved establishment. Incidence of yield loss factors was low, and only small effects of cultivar and fertilizer were seen. Fertilizer increased grain yields of the local cultivar by as much as 153%. The use of fertilizer and improved cultivars increased grain yields by as much as 171% over an unfertilized local millet. Even without government subsidies, fertilizer use was profitable for 56% of farmers on all cultivars. In general, fertilizers and improved cultivars had a small positive impact on profitability, with little adverse impact on grain yield variability, so that they could be recommended to farmers with some prospect of success. The intercropping treatment failed in both years, and would have to be modified before extension.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. R., Dillon, J. L. & Hardaker, B. (1977). Agricultural Decision Analysis. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Gilroy. (1983). The analysis of memory bias in agricultural labour data collection: A case study of small farms in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Economics 34:7986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICRISAT (1983a). Annual Report, 1982. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
ICRISAT (1983b). Rapport Annuel de l'ICRISAT Haute Volta, Programme Economie, 1982. Ouagadougou: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Kowal, J. M. & Kassam, A. H. (1978). Agricultural Ecology of Savanna: A Study of West Africa: Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ly, S., Deuson, R., Maliki, K., Numa, G., Reddy, C. & Swinton, S. (1986). Evaluation des essais en milieu reel sur les cultures associees mil-niebe: resultats de la campagne de 1985. Document No 14F. Niamey, Niger: Institut National de la Recherches Agronomiques du Niger.Google Scholar
Sivakumar, M. V. K., Virmani, S. M. & Reddy, S. J. (1982). Rainfall Climatology of West Africa: Niger. ICRISAT Information Bulletin No 5. Hyderabad: ICRISAT.Google Scholar