Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:50:25.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritive Value and Yields of Some Forage Legumes and Barley Harvested as Immature Herbage, Hay and Straw in North-West Syria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

E. F. Thomson ,
S. Rihawi  and
N. Nersoyan
E. F. Thomson
Affiliation:
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
S. Rihawi
Affiliation:
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
N. Nersoyan
Affiliation:
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The nutritive value and yield of forage legumes and barley harvested as immature herbage, hay and straw were measured in two experiments. The voluntary feed intake of peas at all stages of maturity and immature herbage from woollypod vetch was substantially lower than that of common vetch and chickling. At each stage of maturity barley was less digestible than all the forages except immature peas. Despite exceptionally cold weather in February/March 1985, yields of common vetch were higher in 1984/85 than in 1985/86 when there was less rain. Peas yielded the most hay, and chickling yielded less seed and straw than common vetch, peas and barley. Yields of digestible dry matter from straw and seed exceeded those from hay but protein yield at the two stages was similar. Mechanical baling substantially reduced the yields of baled hay but these losses would be reduced to less than 10% if the residues were grazed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 49 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abd El Moneim, A. M., Cocks, P. S. & Swedan, Y. (1988). Yield stability of selected forage vetches (Vicia species) under rainfed conditions in West Asia. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 110:455–464.Google Scholar
Andrieu, J., Demarquilly, C. & Le Du, J. (1982). Valeur alimentaire de la plante entière de feverole, de lupin, de pois et de soja sur pied et après ensilage. Bulletin Technique 47:19–26. Theix: CRZV, INRA.Google Scholar
Arnold, G. W. (1962). Effects of pasture maturity on the diet of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13:701–706.Google Scholar
Arnold, G. W. & Wallace, S. R. (1977). The comparative nutritive value for weaner sheep of stubble and grain of peas, vetch and lupin crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28:143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, R. S. & Lynch, J. J. (1986). Behavioural factors modifying acceptance of supplementary foods by sheep. Research and Development in Agriculture 3:113–120.Google Scholar
Davies, H. L. (1962). Intake studies in sheep involving high fluid intake. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 4:167–176.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M. & Economides, S. (1985). Digestibility of graminaceous and leguminous hays fed to sheep. Technical Bulletin No. 69. Nicosia: Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas) (1984). Annual Report 1983, p. 219. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas) (1985). Annual Report 1984, 261–264. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas) (1986). Annual Report 1985, 289–292. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas) (1988). Pasture, Forage and Livestock Program Report 1987, p. 193. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
Kaiser, A. G. & Curll, M. L. (1987). Review: improving the efficiency of forage conservation from pastures. In Temperate Pastures: Their Production, Use and Management, 397–411 (Eds Wheeler, J. L., Pearson, G. J. and Robards, G. E.). Canberra: Australian Wool Corporation/Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization.Google Scholar
Kernick, M. D. (1978). Indigenous arid and semi-arid forage plants of North Africa, the Near and Middle East. In Volume IV, Ecological Management of Arid and Semi-arid Range lands in Africa and the Near Middle East. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Nordblom, T. L. (1988). The importance of crop residues as feed resources in West Asia and North Africa. In Plant Breeding and the Nutritive Value of Crop Residues, 41–63 (Eds Reed, J. D., Capper, B. S. and Neate, P. J. H.). Addis Ababa: International Livestock Centre for Africa.Google Scholar
Oram, P. A. (1956). Paturage et culture fouraggères d'assolement dans la region Mediterranéènne. Cahiers No. 57. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Osman, A. E. & Nersoyan, N. (1986). Effect of the proportion of species on the yield and quality of forage mixtures, and on the yield of barley in the following year. Experimental Agriculture 22:345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, K. R. & Fenwick, G. R. (1984). Soyasaponin I, a compound possessing undesirable taste characteristics isolated from the dried pea (Pisum sativum). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 35:887–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rihawi, S., Capper, B. S., Osman, A. & Thomson, E. F. (1987). Effects of crop maturity, weather conditions and cutting height on yield, nutritive value and harvest efficiency of cereal-legume mixtures. Experimental Agriculture 23:451–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, E. F. (1984). First experiences with joint-managed forage and grazing trials. In Proceedings of the Second Farming Systems Symposium, 234–250 (Ed. by Flora, C. B.). Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University.Google Scholar
Thomson, E. F., Jaubert, R. & Oglah, M. (1985). On-farm comparisons of milk yield of Awassi ewes grazing introduced forages and common village lands in the barley zone of NW Syria. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Animal Production in Arid Zones (Ed. by Awa, O. A.). Damascus: Arab Center for Studies of Arid Lands and Dry Zones. (In press.)Google Scholar
Trevino, J., Centeno, C. & Caballero, R. (1987). The chemical composition of pea parts related to harvest time. Animal Feed Science and Technology 16:305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1982). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 282–285. Corvallis, USA: O. and B. Books Inc.Google Scholar