Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T02:06:38.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiple-bean varieties as a strategy for minimizing production risk and enhancing yield stability in smallholder systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2019

Hannington O. Ochieng ,
John O. Ojiem ,
Simon M. Kamwana ,
Joyce C. Mutai  and
James W. Nyongesa
Hannington O. Ochieng
Affiliation:
Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization, Kibos Horticulture Centre, P.O. BOX 1490 - 40100, Kisumu, Kenya
John O. Ojiem*
Affiliation:
Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization, Kibos Horticulture Centre, P.O. BOX 1490 - 40100, Kisumu, Kenya
Simon M. Kamwana
Affiliation:
Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization, Kibos Horticulture Centre, P.O. BOX 1490 - 40100, Kisumu, Kenya
Joyce C. Mutai
Affiliation:
Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization, Kibos Horticulture Centre, P.O. BOX 1490 - 40100, Kisumu, Kenya
James W. Nyongesa
Affiliation:
Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization, Kibos Horticulture Centre, P.O. BOX 1490 - 40100, Kisumu, Kenya
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is perhaps the most important grain legume in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) smallholder systems for food security and household income. Although a wide choice of varieties is available, smallholder farmers in western Kenya realize yields that are low and variable since they operate in risky production environments. Significant seasonal variations exist in rainfall and severity of pests and diseases. This situation is worsened by the low and declining soil fertility, coupled with low capacity of farmers to purchase production inputs such as fertilizers, fungicides and insecticides, and land scarcity. The objective of this study was to investigate whether growing multiple-bean varieties instead of a single variety can enable farmers enhance yield stability over seasons and ensure food security. Five common bean varieties were evaluated in multiple farms for 11 seasons at Kapkerer in Nandi County, western Kenya. Data were collected on grain yield, days to 50% flowering and major diseases. In addition, daily rainfall was recorded throughout the growing seasons. The five varieties were combined in all possible ways to create 31 single- and multiple-bean production strategies. The strategies were evaluated for grain yield performance and yield stability over seasons to determine the risk of not attaining a particular yield target. Results indicated that cropping multiple-bean varieties can be an effective way for reducing production risks in heterogeneous smallholder systems. Yield stability can be greatly enhanced across diverse environments, leading to improved food security, especially for the resource-poor smallholder farmers operating in risk-prone environments. Although the results show that some of the single-bean variety strategies were high yielding, their yield stability was generally lower than those of multiple strategies. Resource-poor risk averse farmers can greatly increase the probability of exceeding their yield targets by cropping multiple-bean varieties with relatively low yields but high grain yield stability. Trading-off high grain yield for yield stability might be an important strategy for minimizing bean production risks.

Keywords

Common beanMultiple varietiesYield stabilityRisk managementSmallholder systems
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 37 - 47
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abate, T. and Ampofo, J.K.O. (1996). Insect pests of beans in Africa: their ecology and management. Annual Review of Entomology 41, 45–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, F.E., Hall, A.E. and DeMason, D.A. (1992). Heat injury during floral development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 79, 784–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, S., Ramírez, J., Jarvis, A., Rao, I.M., Mosquera, G., Bueno, J.M. and Blair, M.W. (2011). Genetic improvement of common beans and the challenges of climate change. In Yadav, S.S., Redden, R.J., Hatfield, J.L., Lotze-Campen, H. and Hall, A.E. (eds), Crop Adaptation to Climate Change. Richmond, Australia: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., published by Blackwell publishing Ltd, pp. 356–369.Google Scholar
Beebe, S., Rao, I., Blair, M. and Acosta, J. (2013). Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. Frontiers in Physiology 4, 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broughton, W.J., Hernandez, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P. and Vanderleyden, J. (2003). Beans (Phaseolus spp.)–model food legumes. Plant and Soil 252(1), 55–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conelly, W.T. and Chaiken, M.S. (2000). Intensive farming, agro-diversity, and food security under conditions of extreme population pressure in western Kenya. Human Ecology 28(1), 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drechsel, P., Gyiele, L., Kunze, D., and Cofie, O. (2001). Population density, soil nutrient depletion, and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Ecological Economics 38 (2), 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajjar, R., Jarvis, D.I. and Gemmill-Herren, B. (2008). The utility of crop genetic diversity in maintaining ecosystem services. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 123(4), 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaetzold, R., Schmidt, H., Hornetz, B. and Shisanya, C. (2007). Farm Management Handbook of Kenya: Vol II: Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information; Part B: Central Kenya; Subpart B1b Northern Rift Valley Province. Nairobi, Kenya: Ministry of Agriculture/GTZ.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, A.J. (2002). Dry bean production. Printed and published by Department of Agriculture, Resource Centre, Directorate Agricultural Information Services, Private Bag X, 144, 27.Google Scholar
Mukankusi, C.M., Nkalubo, S., Katungi, E., Awio, B., Luyima, G., Radeny, M. and Kinyangi, J. (2015). Participatory evaluation of common bean for drought and disease resilience traits in Uganda. CCAFS Working Paper no. 143. Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).Google Scholar
Ojiem, J., De Ridder, N., Vanlauwe, B. and Giller, K. (2006). Socio-ecological niche: a conceptual framework for integration of legumes in smallholder farming systems. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 4, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onyango, M., Otieno, D.J., Nyikal, R.A. and Ojiem, J. (2016). An economic analysis of grain legumes profitability in Nandi County, Kenya. In AAAE Fifth International Conference. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 246314Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, M., Campos, M., Warren, R., Birkmann, J., Luber, G., O’Neill, B. and Takahashi, K. (2014). Emergent risks and key vulnerabilities. In Field C., B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P.R. and White, L.L. (eds), Climate Change2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panelon Climate Change, 1039–1099). Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rao, I.M. (2001). Role of physiology in improving crop adaptation to abiotic stresses in the tropics: the case of common bean and tropical forages. In Pessarakli, M. (ed), Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology, 2nd Edn. Revised and Expanded. NewYork: Marcel Dekker Inc. pp. 583–613.Google Scholar
Schwartz, H.F. and Corrales, M.A.P. (eds.) (1989). Bean Production Problems in the Tropics. 2nd Edn. Cali, Colombia: CIAT. 726 p.Google Scholar
Schweigman, C. and Joosten, G. (1985). Operations Research Problems in Agriculture in Developing Countries. Khartoum, Sudan: Khartoum University Press.Google Scholar
Sinebo, W. (2005). Trade-off between yield increase and yield stability in three decades of barley breeding in a tropical highland environment. Field Crops Research 92(1), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortmann, C.S., Kirkby, R.A., Aledu, C.A. and Allen, D.J. (1998). Atlas of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris. L) Production in Africa. Cali, Colombia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropica. 131 p.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ochieng et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Ochieng et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ochieng et al. supplementary material

Table S2

Download Ochieng et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.9 KB