Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:12:25.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT RISKS AND ZN FERTILIZATION NEEDS IN ZN BIOFORTIFICATION BREEDING IN LOWLAND RICE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2017

F.H.C. RUBIANES*
Affiliation:
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
B.P. MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding, Genetics, and Biotechnology Division, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
S.E. JOHNSON-BEEBOUT
Affiliation:
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
*
§Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]

Summary

As zinc (Zn) fertilizer and water management affect the expression of Zn-enriched grain traits in rice, we studied the effect of Zn fertilizer and water management on Zn uptake and grain yield of different biofortification breeding lines and the possible biases in selection for high grain Zn content. The first field experiment showed that longer duration genotypes had higher grain Zn uptake rate than shorter duration genotypes during grain filling. In the first greenhouse experiment, neither application of Zn fertilizer at mid-tillering nor application at flowering significantly increased the grain Zn concentration. In the second greenhouse experiment, application of alternate wetting and drying (AWD) significantly increased the available soil Zn and plant Zn uptake but not grain Zn concentration. Terminal drying (TD) did not increase the available soil Zn or grain Zn contents. The second field experiment confirmed that differences in TD were not important in understanding differences between genotypes. Zn application is not always necessary to breeding trials unless there is a severe Zn deficiency and there is no need to carefully regulate TD prior to harvest.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AWD – Alternate wetting and drying; CF – Continuous flooding; TD – Terminal Drying.

References

REFERENCES

Bray, R. H. and Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Determination of total and available phosphorus in soils. Soil Science 59:3945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunquin, M. A., Tandy, S., Johnson-Beebout, S. E. and Schulin, R. (2016). Influence of soil properties on Zn solubility dynamics under different redox conditions in non-calcareous soils. Pedosphere (in press, accepted May 2016).Google Scholar
Cakmak, I. (2008). Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification?. Plant Soil 302:117. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9466-3.Google Scholar
Dobermann, A., Dawe, D., Roetter, R. P. and Cassman, K. G. (2000). Reversal of rice yield decline in a long-term continuous cropping experiment. Agronomy Journal 92:633643.Google Scholar
Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W. (1979). Particle size analysis by hydrometer: A simplified method for routine textural analysis and a sensitivity test of measured parameters. Soil Science Society of America Journal 43:10041007.Google Scholar
Gregorio, GB (2002) Progress in breeding for trace minerals in staple crops. Journal of Nutrition 132 (3):500S502S.Google Scholar
Helmke, P. A. and Sparks, D. L. (1996). Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, and cesium. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 568–569 (Ed Sparks, D. L.). SSSA Book Series No. 5. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Jiang, W., Struik, P. C., Zhao, M., Van Keulen, H., Fan, T. Q. and Stomph, T. J. (2008). Indices to screen for grain yield and grain zinc mass concentrations in aerobic rice at different soil-Zn levels. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 55 (2):181197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Beebout, S. E., Angeles, O. R., Alberto, M. C. R. and Buresh, R. J. (2009b). Simultaneous minimization of nitrous oxide and methane emission from rice paddy soils is improbable due to redox potential changes with depth in a greenhouse experiment without plants. Geoderma 149:4553. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.11.012Google Scholar
Johnson-Beebout, S. E., Lauren, J. G. and Duxbury, J. M. (2009a). Immobilization of zinc fertilizer in flooded soils monitored by adapted DTPA soil test. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 40:18421861. doi: 10.1080/00103620902896738.Google Scholar
Lampayan, R. M., Rejesus, R. M., Singleton, G. R. and Bouman, B. A. M. (2015). Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for irrigated lowland rice. Field Crops Research 170:95108.Google Scholar
Mabesa, R. L., Impa, S. M., Grewal, D. and Johnson-Beebout, S. E. (2013). Contrasting grain-Zn response of biofortification rice (Oryza sativa L.) breeding lines to foliar Zn application. Field Crops Research 149:223233. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.012.Google Scholar
Nestel, P., Bouis, H. E., Meenakshi, J. V. and Pfeiffer, W. (2006). Biofortification of staple food crops. Journal of Nutrition 136:10641067.Google Scholar
Phattarakul, N., Rerkasem, B., Li, L. J., Wu, L. H., Zou, W. Q., Ram, H., Sohu, V. S., Kang, B. S., Surek, H., Kalayci, M., Yazici, A., Zhang, F. S. and Cakmak, I. (2012). Biofortification of rice grain with zinc through zinc fertilization in different countries. Plant Soil 361:131141.Google Scholar
Rehman, H. U., Aziz, T., Farooq, M., Wakeel, A. and Rengel, Z. (2012). Zinc nutrition in rice production systems: A review. Plant Soil 361:203226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shivay, Y. S., Kumar, D. and Prasad, R. (2008). Effect of zinc-enriched urea on productivity, zinc uptake and efficiency of an aromatic rice–wheat cropping system. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem 81:229243. doi: 10.1007/s10705-007-9159-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, A. J., Nestel, P., Meenakshi, J. V., Qaim, M., Sachdev, H. P. S. and Bhutta, Z. A. (2006). Plant breeding to control zinc deficiency in India: How cost-effective is biofortification? Public Health Nutrition 10:492501. doi: 10.1017/s1368980007223857.Google Scholar
Sumner, M. E. and Miller, W. P. (1996). Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods (Ed Sparks, D. L.). SSSA Book Series No. 5. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. W. (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods (Ed Sparks, D. L.). SSSA Book Series No. 5. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Tuyogon, D. S. J., Impa, S. M., Castillo, O. B., Larazo, W. and Johnson-Beebout, S. E. (2016). Enriching grain Zn through Zn fertilization and water management in rice. Soil Science Society of America Journal (in press). doi: 10.2136/sssaj2015.07.0262.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37:2938.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Wei, Y., Dong, L., Lu, L., Feng, Y., Zhang, J., Pan, F. and Yang, X. (2014). Improved yield and Zn accumulation for rice grain by Zn fertilization and optimized water management. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology) 15 (4):365374.Google Scholar
Wu, C, Lu, L, Yang, X, Feng, Y, Wei, Y, Hao, H, Stoffella, P and He, Z. (2010). Uptake, translocation, and remobilization of Zn absorbed at different growth stages by rice genotypes of different Zn densities. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58:67676773. doi: 10.1021/jf100017e.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Rubianes supplementary material

Tables S1-S2 and Figure S1

Download Rubianes supplementary material(File)
File 48.4 KB