Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T08:00:26.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inducing Orthotropic Shoots in Coffee with the Morphactin Chlorflurenolmethylester

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

W. P. C. Stemmer ,
J. C. J. Van Adrichem  and
F. A. Roorda
W. P. C. Stemmer
Affiliation:
Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
J. C. J. Van Adrichem
Affiliation:
Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
F. A. Roorda
Affiliation:
Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The auxin-transport-inhibiting morphactin chlorflurenolmethylester (CFM; Methyl 2-chloro-9-hydroxyfluorene-9-carboxylate) breaks the dormancy of axillary buds in young coffee plants and produces orthotropic shoots. A concentration of CFM as low as 50 mg/litre induced an average of 24 orthotropic shoots per 6-month-old seedling. This approach could provide a fast and inexpensive method of vegetative propagation for raising disease-resistant cultivars if adult clones respond similarly to the seedlings used here and the treatment does not adversely affect the propagation of induced shoots.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 29 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Erdmann, D., Mohr, G. & Schneider, G. (1967). Untersuchungen mit einem C-markierten Morphactin (Flurenol). Merck-Blätter 17:11–20.Google Scholar
Gagianas, A. A. & Berg, A. R. (1977). The effect of morphactin (methyl 2-chloro-9-hydroxyfluorene-9-carboxylate) on basipetal transport of indolyl-3-acetic acid in hypocotyl sections of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annals of Botany 41:1135–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merck, E. (1971a). Morphactins. Experimental preparations for growth regulation in field crops. Technical Information.Google Scholar
Merck, E. (1971b). Morphactins. Experimental preparations for growth regulation in fruit, vine and plantation crops. Technical Information.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. (1939). Beschouwing over koffiehoutgradaties, entrijskeuze en entrijsvermeerdering op grond van practijkwaarnemingen. Archief Koffiecultuur Nederlands-Indië 13:51–150.Google Scholar
Moens, P. (1963). Vegetative and generative buds of Coffea canephora. La Cellule, Louvain 63:165–244.Google Scholar
Rehm, S., Zayed, E. A. & Espig, G. (1977). Stimulation of sprouting of secondary buds on coffee seedlings by growth regulators. Tropenlandwirt April:7–19.Google Scholar
Schneider, G. (1972). Morphactins and plant growth regulation. In: Hormonal Regulation of Plant Growth and Development, 317–333 (Ed. Kaldewey, H. & Vardar, Y.). Proceedings of Advanced Study Institute, Izmir 1971, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim.Google Scholar
Schneider, G. & Flemming, H. (1965). Aniten, a new broad-spectrum weedkiller for grains. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheit und Pflanzenschutz, Sonderheft 3:231–239.Google Scholar
Van der Vossen, H. A. M.Op de Laak, J. & Waweru, J. M. (1977). Defining optimum conditions and techniques for successful topworking by cleft grafting of Coffea arabica L. in Kenya. Kenya Coffee 42 (495):207–278.Google Scholar
Wormer, T. M. & Gituanja, J. (1970). Seasonal patterns of growth and development of Arabica coffee in Kenya. II. Kenya Coffee 35 (413):270–278.Google Scholar