Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:26:37.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HIGH SOIL CALCIUM SATURATION LIMITS USE OF LEAF POTASSIUM DIAGNOSIS WHEN KCL IS APPLIED IN OIL PALM PLANTATIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

BERNARD DUBOS ,
VICTOR BARON ,
XAVIER BONNEAU ,
ALBERT FLORI  and
JEAN OLLIVIER
BERNARD DUBOS*
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR Systèmes de pérennes, F-34398, Montpellier, France
VICTOR BARON
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR Systèmes de pérennes, F-34398, Montpellier, France
XAVIER BONNEAU
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR Systèmes de pérennes, F-34398, Montpellier, France
ALBERT FLORI
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR Systèmes de pérennes, F-34398, Montpellier, France
JEAN OLLIVIER
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR Systèmes de pérennes, F-34398, Montpellier, France
*
†Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Potassium chloride (KCl) is the most widely used fertilizer in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) plantations and the rates applied are based on interpretation of leaf K contents. When no positive response on leaf K contents can be detected, no optimum content can be established whatever the yield response to KCl rates. We used data from 13 fertilization trials conducted on several continents to study the responses of leaf K, leaf Cl, leaf Ca and yield to KCl rates as a function of the soil properties of each site. We found that the abundance of exchangeable Ca in the soil expressed as a percent of the cation exchange capacity (CEC) was the best soil variable to predict if leaf K content would increase with KCl rates. In addition, we found that the leaf K contents of unfertilized controls at the end of the trials were also correlated with Ca/CEC. This ratio thus appears to be a better index of soil K reserves than soil exchangeable K content.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 54 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 794 - 804
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Breure, C. J. and Rosenquist, E. A. (1977). An oil palm fertilizer experiment on volcanic soils in Papua New Guinea. Oléagineux 32 (7):301–316.Google Scholar
Caliman, J.-P., Daniel, C. and Tailliez, B. (1994). Oil palm mineral nutrition. Plantations, Recherche, Développement 1 (3):36–54.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. W. and Gray, H. M. (1949). Leaf analysis and the nutrition of oil palm. Annals of Botany 13 (52):415–433.Google Scholar
Dubos, B., Alarcón, W. H., Chaves, G. and Rubio, J. D. (2013). El diagnóstico de la nutrición potásica: La experiencia de Indupalma Ltda. Palmas 34 (3):21–27.Google Scholar
Dubos, B., Alarcón, W. H., López, J. E. and Ollivier, J. (2011). Potassium uptake and storage in oil palm organs: The role of chlorine and the influence of soil characteristics in the Magdalena valley, Colombia. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 89 (2):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9389-x.Google Scholar
Dubos, B., Snoeck, D. and Flori, A. (2017). Excessive use of fertilizer can increase leaching processes and modify soil reserves in two ecuadorian oil palm plantations. Experimental Agriculture 53 (02):255–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479716000363.Google Scholar
Fallavier, P. and Olivin, J. (1988). Etude expérimentale de la dynamique du potassium et du magnésium dans quelques sols tropicaux représentatifs de la zone de culture du palmier à huile. Oléagineux 43 (3):93–101.Google Scholar
Foster, H. L. (2003). Assessment of oil palm fertilizer requirements. In Oil Palm: Management for Large and Sustainable Yields, 191–230 (Eds Fairhurst, T. and Hardter, R.). Singapore: Potash & Phosphate Institute/Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada and International Potash Institute.Google Scholar
Foster, H. L. and Prabowo, N. E. (1996). Variation in potassium fertilizer requirements in oil palm in North Sumatra. Presented at the 1996 PORIM International Palm Oil Congress: Competitiveness for the 21st Century, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: PORIM.Google Scholar
Goh, K. J. and Hardter, R. (2003). General oil palm nutrition. In Oil Palm: Management for Large and Sustainable Yields, 191–230 (Eds Fairhurst, T. and Hardter, R.). Singapore: Potash & Phosphate Institute/Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada and International Potash Institute.Google Scholar
Guiking, F. C. T. (1984). Problems in the uptake of potash by oil palm (Elaeis Guineensis) in Papua New Guinea–. Presented at the International Conference on Soils and Nutrition of Perennial Crops, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Malaysian Society of Soil Science. 435–443.Google Scholar
Kee, K. K., Goh, K. J. and Chew, P. S. (1995). Effects of NK fertilizer on soil pH and exchangeable K status on acid soils in an oil palm plantation in Malaysia. In Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management, 809–815 (Eds Date, R. A., Grundon, N. J., Rayment, G. E. and Probert, M. E.). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-011-0221-6_130.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. N., Webb, M. J., Banabas, M., Nake, S., Goodrick, I., Gordon, J., O'Grady, , , D. and Dubos, B. (2014). Methods to account for tree-scale variability in soil- and plant-related parameters in oil palm plantations. Plant and Soil 374 (1–2):459–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1894-7.Google Scholar
Ng, H. C. P., Chew, P. S., Goh, K. J. and Kee, K. K. (1999). Nutrient requirements and sustainability in mature oil palms–an assessment. The Planter 75 (880):331–345.Google Scholar
Ng, S. K., Thamboo, S. and De Souza, P. (1968). Nutrient contents of oil palm in Malaysia - II Nutrients in vegetative tissues. The Malaysian Agricultural Journal 46 (3):332–391.Google Scholar
Ollagnier, M. and Ochs, R. (1981). Management of mineral nutrition on industrial oil palm plantations. Fertilizer savings. Oléagineux 36 (8–9):409–421.Google Scholar
Prevot, P. and Ollagnier, M. (1956). Utilisation du Diagnostic Foliaire. Oléagineux 11 (11):695–703.Google Scholar
Rival, A. and Levang, P. (2015). The oil palm (Elaeis guineensis): Research challenges beyond controversies. Palms 59 (1):33–49.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. (2011). SAS/STAT 9.3. User's Guide. Cary NC, USA: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Teoh, K. C. and Chew, P. S. (1987). Use of Rachis analysis as an indicator of K nutrient status in oil palm. In (Eds Hassan, H. A., Chew, P. S., Wood, B. J. and Pushparajah, E.). Presented at the 1987 International Oil Palm/Palm Oil Conferences: Progress and Prospects, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia: MPOB. 262–271.Google Scholar
Tung, P. G. A., Mohd, K. Y., Majid, N. M., Goh, K. J. and Huang, G. H. (2009). Effect of N and K fertilizers on nutrient leaching and groundwater quality under mature oil palm in sabah during the monsoon period. American Journal of Applied Sciences 6 (10):1788–1799. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2009.1788.1799.Google Scholar
Wilkie, A. S. and Foster, H. L. (1989). Oil palm response to fertilizer in Papua New Guinea. Presented at the 1989 PORIM International Palm Oil Development Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: MPOB. 395–405.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dubos et al supplementary material 1

Supplementary Table

Download Dubos et al supplementary material 1(File)
File 18.6 KB