Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:40:23.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficiency of Isobutylidene Diurea, Sulphur-Coated Urea and Urea Plus Nitrapyrin, compared with Divided Dressings of Urea, for Dry Matter Production and Nitrogen Uptake of Ryegrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

J. Halevy
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Centre, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel†

Summary

Two slow-release nitrogen fertilizers, isobutylidene diurea (IBDU) and sulphur-coated urea (SCU), and urea plus nitrapyrin were compared with urea alone for their effect on the growth and nitrogen uptake of ryegrass in a greenhouse experiment.

The IBDU and the SCU were applied in one dressing before sowing and the urea in five dressings (one after each cut). Dry matter yield and nitrogen uptake of the six cuts at the optimum levels of 3 and 6 g N pot−1 (equivalent to 1120 and 2240 kg N ha−1 on a weight basis) were similar for the slow-release fertilizers and urea, showing that SCU and IBDU can be effective sources of nitrogen for ryegrass at rates far above those regarded as safe for conventional nitrogen fertilizers when applied in a single dose.

Nitrapyrin at 20 ppm effectively inhibited nitrification for 12 weeks, then its effect rapidly declined, disappearing after 18 weeks. Ryegrass growth was retarded by nitrapyrin treatment, probably as a result of an accumulation of NH4-N in the soil.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S. E., Hunt, C. M. & Terman, G. L. (1971). Nitrogen release from sulfur-coated urea as affected by coating weight, placement and temperature. Agronomy Journal 63:529533.Google Scholar
Ayed, I. A. & Mashady, A. S. (1984). The tolerance of a grass forage grown in pots, to urea applied to calcareous soils under very hot and dry conditions. Fertilizers Research 5:175180.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1965). Organic nitrogen in soils. Agronomy Series 10:93149.Google Scholar
Broadbent, F. E. & Clark, F. (1965). Denitrification. Agronomy Series 10:344359.Google Scholar
Burg, P. F. J. van (1966). Nitrate as an indicator of the nitrogen nutrition status of grass. In Proceedings of the 10th International Grass Congress, 267272.Google Scholar
Cox, D. & Addiscott, T. M. (1976). Sulfur coated urea as a fertilizer for potatoes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27:10151020.Google Scholar
Davies, L. H. (1976). Slow-release fertilizers, particularly sulfur-coated urea. Proceedings No. 153. London: The Fertilizer Society.Google Scholar
Hagin, J. & Cohen, L. (1976). Nitrogen fertilizer potential of an experimental urea formaldehyde. Agronomy Journal 68:518520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamamoto, M. (1966). Isobutylidene diurea as a slow-acting nitrogen fertilizer and the studies in this field in Japan. Proceedings No. 90. London: The Fertilizer Society.Google Scholar
Hank, R. D. (1972). Synthetic slow-release fertilizers and fertilizer amendments. In Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment. VoL 2, 635641 (Eds Goring, C. A. I. and Hamaker, J. W.). New York, NY: Marcel-Dekker.Google Scholar
Hummel, N. W. Jr & Waddington, D. V. (1984). Sulfur-coated urea for turf-grass fertilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48:191195.Google Scholar
Jansson, S. L. & Persson, J. (1982). Mineralization and immobilization of soil nitrogen. Agronomy Series 22:229252.Google Scholar
Keeney, D. R. (1982). Nitrogen management for maximum efficiency and minimum pollution. Agronomy Series 22:605649.Google Scholar
Kipnis, T., Feigin, A., Dovrat, A. & Levanon, D. (1979). Ecological and agricultural aspects of nitrogen balance in perennial pasture irrigated with municipal effluents. Progress in Water Technology 11:127138.Google Scholar
Liegel, E. L. & Walsh, L. M. (1976). Evaluation of sulfur-coated urea applied to irrigated potatoes and corn. Agronomy Journal 68:457463.Google Scholar
Lunt, O. R. & Clark, S. B. (1969). Properties and value of 1, 1 Diureido Isobutane (IBDU) as a long-lasting nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 17:12691271.Google Scholar
Mullison, W. R. & Norris, M. G. (1976). A review of the toxicological, residual and environmental effects of nitrapyrin and its metabolite 6-chloropicolinic acid. Down Earth 32:2227.Google Scholar
Nowakowski, T. Z. & Gasser, J. K. R. (1967). The effect of a nitrification inhibitor on the concentration of nitrate in plants. Journal of Agricultural Science 68:131133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penny, A., Addiscott, H. M. & Widdowson, F. V. (1984). Assessing the need of maincrop potatoes for late nitrogen by using isobutylidene di-urea, by injecting nitrification inhibitors with aqueous N fertilizers and by dividing dressings of ‘Nitro-Chalk’. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103:572583.Google Scholar
Prasad, R., Rajale, G. B. & Lakhdive, B. A. (1971). Nitrification retarders and slow-release nitrogen fertilizers. Advances in Agronomy 23:337383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheton, J. E. (1976). An evaluation of sulfur-coated urea as a preplant total season nitrogen supply for trellised tomatoes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40:126129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, G. M. & Horn, G. C. (1975). Response curves of various turfgrasses to application of several controlled release sources. Agronomy Journal 61:201204.Google Scholar