Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:09:32.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium on Flowering and Yield of Soybeans in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

G. P. Tewari
G. P. Tewari
Affiliation:
Department of Plant-Soil Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Eastern Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A NPK factorial experiment was conducted during two successive cropping seasons to study direct and residual effects of various treatments on the flower initiation and yield of soybeans. Plants were slower to reach the maximum flowering stage in the year of fertilizer application than in the following year. During the first year potassium in association with phosphorus delayed the flower forming process, whereas potassium alone hastened flowering in the second year unless associated with a high dosage of nitrogen. All the treatments gave far greater yields in the first season, suggesting that fertilizers should be applied during every cropping season. Nitrogen and phosphorus at 20 pounds of N2 and P2O5, per acre gave the biggest yields, but potassium failed to show any response. The residual responses to potassium and phosphorus during the second year were significant but not to nitrogen.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 1965 , pp. 185 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borthwick, H. A. & Parker, M. W. (1938). Bot. Gaz. 99, 825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartter, J. L. (1941). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 5, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, E. R., Nelson, W. L. & Hartwig, E. E. (1947). N.C. Agric. Ext. Serv. Circ. 295.Google Scholar
Colwell, W. E. (1944). Better Crops 28, 23, 45.Google Scholar
Garner, W. W. (1933). Plant Physiol. 8, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, R. W. (1960). Advanc. in Agron. 12, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A. L. & Miller, L. B. (1941). Better Crops 28, 23, 45.Google Scholar
Nelson, W. L. & Hartwig, E. E. (1948). Crops and Soils 2, 8, 21.Google Scholar
Norman, A. G. & Krampitz, L. O. (1946). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 10, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. W. (1962). Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. London, Longman Green.Google Scholar
Scully, N. J., Parker, M. W. & Borthwick, H. A. (1945). Bot. Gaz. 107, 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, G. D. (1947). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 11, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbreit, W. W. & Fred, E. B. (1936). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 28, 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M. G. (1949). Advanc. Agron. 1, 78.Google Scholar