Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:23:18.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF GREEN MANURES AND NPK FERTILIZER ON SOIL PROPERTIES, TOMATO YIELD AND QUALITY IN THE FOREST-SAVANNA ECOLOGY OF NIGERIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2018

TAIWO M. AGBEDE ,
ARUNA O. ADEKIYA ,
MONDAY O. ALE ,
EHIOKHILEN K. EIFEDIYI  and
CHRISTY A. OLATUNJI
TAIWO M. AGBEDE*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Management Technology, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, P.M.B. 1019, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
ARUNA O. ADEKIYA
Affiliation:
College of Agricultural Sciences, Landmark University, P.M.B. 1001, Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
MONDAY O. ALE
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Bioenvironmental Engineering Technology, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, P.M.B. 1019, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
EHIOKHILEN K. EIFEDIYI
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Ilorin, P.M.B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
CHRISTY A. OLATUNJI
Affiliation:
Department of Hospitality Management Technology, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, P.M.B. 1019, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
*
‡‡Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Green manures (GM) as an alternative to inorganic fertilizer offer considerable potential as a source of plant nutrients and organic matter (OM). Hence, field experiments were carried out during 2015 and 2016 cropping seasons to compare impacts of GM and NPK (15:15:15) fertilizer on soil properties, growth, fruit yield, mineral, lycopene and vitamin C contents of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). GMs were composed by green tender stems and leaves of pawpaw (Carica papaya L.), neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.), moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.) or gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp.) and applied at 5 Mg ha−1, whereas NPK was applied at 300 kg ha−1 and there was a no fertilizer plot (control). Application of GMs reduced soil bulk density and increased soil OM, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, growth, number of fruits and fruit yield of tomato compared with the control. NPK fertilizer had no effect on soil bulk density and soil OM, but it increased soil fertility and tomato yield as compared with the control. When comparing treatments, the highest tomato yield and best cost:benefit ratio were obtained with gliricidia as GM. The GMs and NPK fertilizer increased mineral, lycopene and vitamin C contents in tomato fruits and the highest K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Cu, lycopene and vitamin C contents in tomato fruits were found with moringa as GM. Our results revealed that GM has potential to improve soil properties, tomato yield and quality, being an alternative for cropping management.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 55 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 793 - 806
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, P. (1986). Mineral nutrition. In The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement, 281–334 (Eds Atherton, J. G. and Rudich, J.). New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Adams, P., Graves, C. J. and Winsor, G. W. (1978). Tomato yields in relation to the nitrogen, potassium and magnesium status of the plants and of the peat substrate. Plant and Soil 49(1):137–148.Google Scholar
Adekiya, A. O., Agbede, T. M., Aboyeji, C. M., Dunsin, O. and Ugbe, J. O. (2017). Green manures and NPK fertilizer effects on soil properties, growth, yield, mineral and vitamin C composition of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.05.005 (Article in press).Google Scholar
Adekiya, A. O., Agbede, T. M. and Ojeniyi, S. O. (2016). The effect of three years of tillage and poultry manure application on soil and plant nutrient composition, growth and yield of cocoyam. Experimental Agriculture 52(3):466–476.Google Scholar
Adeleye, E. O. and Ayeni, L. S. (2010). Enhancing soil nutrient status and maize yield through organic wastes on an Alfisol in southwest Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science 20(1):79–85.Google Scholar
Agbede, T. M., Adekiya, A. O. and Ogeh, J. S. (2014). Response of soil properties and yam yield to Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae) and Tithonia diversifolia (Asteraceae) mulches. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 60(2):209–224.Google Scholar
Akinrinde, E. A. and Obigbesan, G. O. (2000). Evaluation of the fertility status of selected soils for crop production in five ecological zones of Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Soil Science Society of Nigeria, 279–288 (Ed. Babalola, O.), 30 Oct–3 Nov, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Ali, M. (1999). Evaluation of green manure technology in tropical lowland rice systems. Field Crops Research 61(1):61–78.Google Scholar
AOAC (2006). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC International, 18th edn. 2005 (Eds Horwitz, W. and Latimer, G. W.). Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International.Google Scholar
Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. (1999). The Nature and Properties of Soils, 12th edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1996). Nitrogen-total. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Chemical Methods, Part 3, 2nd edn, 1085–1121 (Ed Sparks, D. L.). SSSA Book Series No. 5, Madison, WI, USA: ASA and SSSA.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. J. and Henshall, J. K. (1991). Bulk density. In Physical Methods of Soil Analysis, 329–366 (Eds Smith, K. A. and Mullin, C. E.). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Carter, M. R. and Gregorich, E. G. (2007). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd edn., 1264. Canadian Society of Soil Science, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press and Taylor & Francis Group, USA.Google Scholar
Colacico, D. (1982). Economic aspects of composting. Biocycle 31(10):68–73.Google Scholar
Fahey, J. W. (2005). Moringa oleifera: A review of the medical evidence for its nutritional, therapeutic, and prophylactic properties. Part 1. Trees for Life Journal 1:5 http://www.tfljournal.orgGoogle Scholar
FAO (1993). Year Book of Production. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FPDD (1990). Summary of fertilizer recommendations for fruits and vegetables in southwestern nigeria. Literature Review on Soil Fertility Investigation in Nigeria. Fertilizer Procurement Division and Distribution, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lagos, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Frank, K., Beegle, D. and Denning, I. (1998). Phosphorus. In Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region, 21–26 (Ed Brown, J. R.). Columbia, MO, USA: North Central Regional Research Publication No. 221 (revised) Missouri Agric. Exp. Stn.Google Scholar
Gee, G. W. and Or, D. (2002). Particle-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods, 255–293 (Eds Dane, J. H. and Topp, G. C.). Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5.Google Scholar
GENSTAT (2005). Genstat, 8th edn. Release 8.1. Oxford, UK: VSN International Ltd.Google Scholar
Hendershot, W. H., Lalande, H. and Duquette, M. (2008). Ion exchange and exchangeable cations. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd edn, 173–178 (Eds Carter, M. R. and Gregorich, E. G.). Canadian Society of Soil Science, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press and Taylor & Francis Group, USA.Google Scholar
Horwitz, W. and Latimer, G. W. Editors (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, 16th edn. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA: AOAC International.Google Scholar
Hunt, N. and Gilkes, R. (1992). Farm Monitoring Handbook. Nedlands, WA: The University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Ibitoye, A. A. (2006). Laboratory Manual on Basic Soil Analysis, 2nd edn., 82. Akure, Ondo State: Foladaye Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ilupeju, E. A. O., Akanbi, W. B., Olaniyi, J. O., Lawal, B. A., Ojo, M. A. and Akintokun, P. O. (2015). Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, fruit yield, nutritional and lycopene contents of three varieties of tomato [Lycopersicon esculentum (L.) Mill] in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 14(31):2424–2433.Google Scholar
Lampurlanes, J. and Cantero-Martinez, C. (2003). Soil bulk density and penetration resistance under different tillage and crop management systems and their relationship with barley root growth. Agronomy Journal 95:526–536.Google Scholar
Lyon, C. J. (1948). A factor method for the leaf area of tomato leaves. Plant Physiology 23(4):634–635.Google Scholar
Makumba, W., Janssen, B., Oenema, O., Akinnifesi, F. K., Mweta, D. and Kwesiga, F. (2006). The long-term effects of a gliricidia-maize intercropping system in Southern Malawi, on gliricidia and maize yields, and soil properties. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 116(1–2):85–92.Google Scholar
Nandwa, S. M. (2001). Soil organic carbon (SOC) management for sustainable productivity of cropping and agro-forestry systems in Eastern and Southern Africa. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 61(1–2):143–158.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods, 2nd edn., 961–1010 (Ed Sparks, D. L.). SSSA Book Series No. 5, Madison, WI, USA: ASA and SSSA.Google Scholar
Reeuwijk, L. P. van Editor, (2002). Procedures for Soil Analysis. Technical Paper 9, 6th edn. Wageningen, The Netherlands: International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC) & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).Google Scholar
Salahin, N., Alam, Md. K., Islam, Md. M., Naher, L. and Majid, N. M. (2013). Effects of green manure crops and tillage practice on maize and rice yields and soil properties. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7(12):1901–1911.Google Scholar
Santhi, S. R. and Palaniappan, S. P. (1986). Effect of Neem leaf (Azadirachta indica L.) on growth and yield of low land rice. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 157(2):114–117.Google Scholar
Sharoni, Y. and Levi, Y. (2006). Cancer prevention by dietary tomato lycopene and its molecular mechanisms. In Tomatoes, Lycopene and Human Health, 111–125 (Ed Rao, A. V.). Barcelona, Spain: Caledonian Science Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Singh, J., Upadhyay, A. K., Prasad, K., Bahadur, A. and Rai, M. (2007). Variability of carotenes, vitamin C, E and phenolics in Brassica vegetables. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 20(2):106–112.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff. (2014). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th edn. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Tel, D. A. and Hagarty, M., Eds. (1984). Soil and Plant Analysis, 277. Nigeria, Guelph, Ontario, Canada: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), University of Guelph, Ibadan.Google Scholar
Tsado, P. A., Agbenin, J. O., Osunde, A. O., Bala, A. and Odofin, A. J. (2008). The effect of some selected organic acids on phosphorus sortion in an Alfisol in Minna, North Central Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the Soil Science Society of Nigeria, 276–283 (Eds Singh, L., Usman, B. H., Saddiq, A. M., Musa, H. and Ojeniyi, S. O.), March 10–14th, Yola, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Undie, U. L., Kekong, M. A. and Ojikpong, T. O. (2013). Moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.) leaves effect on soil pH and garden egg (Solanum aethiopicum L.) yield in two Nigeria agro-ecologies. European Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Research 1(1):17–25.Google Scholar
Willcox, J. K., Catignani, G. L. and Lazarus, S. (2003). Tomatoes and cardiovascular health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 43(1):1–18.Google Scholar