Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:44:21.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Cycocel on Crop Plants in Sierra Leone II. Cassava (Manihot Esculenta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

D. K. Das Gupta
D. K. Das Gupta
Affiliation:
Njala University College, University of Sierra Leone, Sierra Leone
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The response of cassava to CCC was investigated by applying concentrations of 0, 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000 ppm twice or four times as a foliar spray, which resulted in a significantly greater tuber yield than the control with most marked effects at the final harvest. CCC at 1500 ppm, applied four times at various growth stages, gave the best increase in tuber yield. Application of CCC tended to cause greater RGR and dry matter content (percentage) of tubers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , October 1976 , pp. 321 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Birecka, H. (1967). Isotopes in Plant Nutrition and Physiology. Vienna: Inter-Atom Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Cyanamid International Technical Information Bulletin (1966). Cycocel: Plant Growth Regulant. New Jersey: Amer. Cyan. Co.Google Scholar
Dyson, P. W. (1965). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 16, 542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Fouly, M. M. & Jung, J. (1966). Zfpfl physiologie 55, 229.Google Scholar
El-Fouly, M. M., Salib, J. G. & El-Baz, F. K. (1968). Zfpfl erahrung u Bkd 121, 66.Google Scholar
El-Fouly, M. M., Masoud, Y. A. & El-Hindi, M. H. (1971). World Crops 23, (3) 133.Google Scholar
Enyi, B. A. C. (1972a). E. Afr. agric. For. J. 38, (1) 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyi, B. A. C. (1972b). E. Afr. agric. For. J. 38, (1) 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanus, H. (1967). Zf Acker-u pfl bau 125, 40.Google Scholar
Humphries, E. C. & Dyson, P. W. (1967). Ann. appl. Biol. 60, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, J. (1967). Naturwiss. 54, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radwan, A. A., El-Fouly, M. M. & Garas, N. A. (1971). Potato Res. 14, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sam-Aggrey, W. G. & Bundu, H. S. (1972). Njala Univ. Coll., Univ. of Sierra Leone, Circ. 6.Google Scholar
Skene, K. G. M. & Mullins, M. G. (1967). Planta 77, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddart, J. L. (1964). CCC Research Symposium, Geneva, Switzerland. Cyanamid International, Wayne, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1958). Ann. Bot., Lond. 22, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar