Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:34:06.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Cultivar and Location on Seed Protein in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

B. S. Dahiya ,
A. C. Kapoor ,
I. S. Solanki  and
R. S. Waldia
B. S. Dahiya
Affiliation:
Haryana Agricultural University, Hissar—125 004, India
A. C. Kapoor
Affiliation:
Haryana Agricultural University, Hissar—125 004, India
I. S. Solanki
Affiliation:
Haryana Agricultural University, Hissar—125 004, India
R. S. Waldia
Affiliation:
Haryana Agricultural University, Hissar—125 004, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Significant differences were found between 20 chickpea cultivars and four locations in respect of the concentration of protein in the seeds. Cultivar x location interactions were also significant. The average protein concentration among cultivars varied from 18.5 to 23.2% and among locations from 18.3 to 22.7%. Correlations between seed protein concentration and seed yield and seed size were very small. Protein concentration was influenced by available nitrogen in the soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 1982 , pp. 289 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AOAC (1965). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 10th edn, 744–745. Washington: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Bliant, A. (1970). Protein Growth by Plant Breeding. Budapest: Academiai Viado.Google Scholar
Chopra, S. L. & Kanwar, J. S. (1976). Analytical Agricultural Chemistry, 245–298. Ludhiana, New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers.Google Scholar
Dahiya, B. S. & Brar, J. S. (1976). The relationship between seed size and protein content in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 3:18.Google Scholar
Dahiya, B. S., Brar, J. S. & Bhullar, B. S. (1977). Inheritance of protein content and its correlation with grain yield in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Qualitas Plantarum, Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 27:327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krober, D. A., Jacob, M. K., Lala, R. K. & Kashkary, V. K. (1970). Effect of variety and locations on the protein content of pulses. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 40:1025–1030.Google Scholar
Kushwaha, D. D. & Srivastava, G. D. (1978). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and inoculation on the biochemical composition of mung (Vigna radiata). Indian Journal of Agricultural Chemistry 11:43–48.Google Scholar
Leleji, D. I., Dickson, M. S., Crowder, L. V. & Bourke, J. B. (1972). Inheritance of crude protein percentage and its correlation with seed yield in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Crop Science 12:168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutger, J. N. (1968). Variation in protein content and its relation to other characters in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). In Report on Drybean Research Conference,Davis, California. 10:59–69.Google Scholar