Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:21:11.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of the proportion of Species on the Yield and Quality of Forage Mixtures, and on the Yield of Barley in the Following Year

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

A. E. Osman  and
N. Nersoyan
A. E. Osman
Affiliation:
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
N. Nersoyan
Affiliation:
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mixtures of legumes and cereals in various proportions (seed ratios) were evaluated in Northern Syria for forage production and quality and for yield of barley grain in the following year. Both a vetch-cereal and pea-cereal mix were tested in proportions of 0:100, 33:66, 50:50, 66:33 and 100:0. The study was carried out between 1982 and 1985, covering two seasons for forage production and two for grain production. Dry matter yields of the mixtures exceeded the yield of either one or both components of the mixture grown as pure stands, depending on the rainfall. The maximum overall yield and quality of forage was recorded for the 66:33 legume-cereal combination. The greatest benefit to subsequent barley grain yield was realized when the legume was grown in a pure stand or formed a high proportion (66:33) of the mixture. Herbage quality was better in forages containing vetch than in those containing pea.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , October 1986 , pp. 345 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cannell, R. Q. & Jobson, H. T. (1968). The relationship between yield and digestibility in spring varieties of barley, oat and wheat after ear emergence. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 71:337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giri, G. & De, R. (1981). Short-season fodder legume effects on the grain yield and nitrogen economy of barley under dryland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96:457–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjchristodoulou, A. (1973). Production of forage from cereals, legumes and their mixtures under rain-fed conditions in Cyprus. Technical Bulletin No. 14. Nicosia: Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Lawes, D. A. & Jones, D. I. H. (1971). Yield, nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of whole-crop spring cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76:479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, B. M., Talpada, P. M. & Shukla, P C. (1973). Effect of intercropping lucerne on the fodder and nutrient production of Guinea-grass. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 43:737–739.Google Scholar
Rao, M. R. & Willey, R. W. (1980). Preliminary studies of intercropping combinations based on pigeon pea or sorghum. Experimental Agriculture 16:29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. C. (1969). Annual legume-cereal mixtures for forage and seed. Agronomy Journal 61:759–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. P. (1983). Summer legume intercrop effects on yield and nitrogen economy of wheat in the succeeding season. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101:401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of herbage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society 18:104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwana, M. S., Puri, K. P. & Gill, G. S. (1978). Assessment of production potential of forage crops in monocultures and mixtures. Journal of Research of Punjab Agricultural University 15:58–61.Google Scholar
Trenbath, B. R. (1974). Biomass productivity of mixtures. Advances in Agronomy 26:177–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waghmare, A. B. & Singh, S. P. (1984). Sorghum-legume intercropping and the effects on nitrogen fertilization. II. Residual effect on wheat. Experimental Agriculture 20:261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping its importance and research needs. I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32:1–10.Google Scholar