Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:44:39.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Sowing Date on the Growth and Yield of Lentil in a Rainfed Mediterranean Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

S. N. Silim ,
M. C. Saxena  and
W. Erskine
S. N. Silim
Affiliation:
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
M. C. Saxena
Affiliation:
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
W. Erskine
Affiliation:
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of advancing the sowing date from early February to November on the growth and seed and straw yields of three large seeded and three small seeded lines of lentil (Lens culinaris) was studied under rainfed conditions in northern Syria between 1982 and 1985. The average seed and straw yields from early winter sowing were 838 and 2476 kg ha−1 compared with 679 and 1470 kg ha−1, respectively, from a late sown crop. There were seasonal differences in the advantage in seed yield from early sowing, largely because infestation by Orbanche species limited the use of early sowing. There were no overall differences between the growth and yields of large and small seeded lines, but genetic variation within groups was apparent for all characters. A high rate of dry matter accumulation, manifested as early vigour, was always related to a high final economic biomass.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 145 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basler, F. (1981). Weeds and their control. In Lentils, 143–154 (Eds Webb, C. and Hawtin, G.). Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (CAB).Google Scholar
Cubero, J. I. (1983). Parasitic diseases in Vicia faba L. with special reference to broomrape (Orobanche crenata Forsk). In The Faba Bean, (Vicia faba L.), 493–521 (Ed. Hebblethwaite, P. D.). London: Buttervvorths.Google Scholar
Cubero, J. I. & Moreno, M. T. (1979). Agronomic control and sources of resistance in Vicia faba to Orobanche spp. In Some Current Research on Viciafaba in Western Europe, 41–80 (Eds Bond, D. A., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. T. and Poulsen, M. H.). Brussels: Commission of European Communities.Google Scholar
Hedley, C. L. & Ambrose, M. J. (1981). Designing‘leafless’pea plants for improving yields of the dry pea crop. Advances in Agronomy 34:255–277.Google Scholar
ICARDA (1985). Annual Report, 1984. Aleppo, Syria: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas.Google Scholar
Saxena, M. C. (1981). Agronomy of lentils. In Lentils, 111–129 (Eds Webb, C. and Hawtin, G.). Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (CAB).Google Scholar
Saxena, M. C., Murinda, M. V., Turk, M. &Trabulsi, N. (1983). Productivity and water use efficiency of lentils as affected by date of sowing. LENS Newsletter 10 (1):28–29.Google Scholar
Saxena, M. C., Silim, S. N. & Singh, K. B. (1990). Effect of supplementary irrigation during reproductive growth on winter and spring chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in a Mediterranean environment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 114:285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. C. G. & Harris, H. C. (1981). Environmental resources and restraints to agricultural production in a Mediterranean-type environment. Plant and Soil 58:31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. C., Jaby El-Haramein, F., Nakkoul, H. & Rihawe, S. (1986). Crop Quality Evaluation Methods and Guidelines. ICARDA Technical Manual No. 14, 142. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar