Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T11:47:57.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Planting Technique and Planting Density on Yield of Late Planted Sugarcane in North Central India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

R. L. Yadav ,
Ravi Kumar  and
R. S. Verma
R. L. Yadav
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226002, India
Ravi Kumar
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226002, India
R. S. Verma
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226002, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In the wheat–sugarcane rotation, which covers more than half of the growing area in subtropical India, planting of sugarcane is delayed until after the wheat harvest in April–May. This allows little time for the sugarcane to produce tillers and so results in smaller millable cane populations and yields than those from more timely (February–March) plantings. This study considers techniques such as ring and trench planting which might allow a high seed rate to compensate for reduced tillering. Yields obtained using these systems were about 20 t ha−1 greater than from the conventional flat planting method, because of a better distribution of primary shoots from the parent sett and reduced plant competition during the early stage of growth. The cost of cane production was greatest with the ring system and least with the conventional planting method but deep trenches gave the best net return.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , July 1991 , pp. 281 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borden, R. J. (1949). Sunlight and sugar yields. Hawaiian Planters Records 53:43–45.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. E. & Benda, G. T. A. (1980). Sugarcane spacing. II Effect of spacing on the plant. Proceedings of XVII Congress of International Society of Sugarcane Technologists. Vol.1:357–67.Google Scholar
Panje, R. R. (1971). Cultural methods of sugarcane production in the sub-tropics. Proceedings of XIV Congress of International Society of Sugarcane Technologists 1:621–627.Google Scholar
Prasad, S. R., Motiwale, M. P. & Singh, A. B. (1979). Effect of plant population and moisture regime on yield and quality of timely and late planted sugarcane in north India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 49:252–265.Google Scholar
Singh, K., Prasad, S. R. & Alam, M. (1983). Improving the yield of late planted sugarcane. Indian Farming 32(11): 3–5.Google Scholar
Singh, K., Yadav, R. L., Singh, B., Hora, B. S., Singh, R. V. & Singh, R. A. (1984). Ring method of planting sugarcane of new technique. Biological Memoirs 9:161–166.Google Scholar
Soopramanien, G. C. & Julien, M. H. R. (1980). Physiological basis of yield variation between and within sugarcane varieties, grown under contrasting environments. II. The evolution of tiller density in relation to yield at harvest. Proceeding XVII Congress of International Society of Sugarcane Technologists Vol. 1:516–525.Google Scholar
Yadav, R. L. (1989). New thrust area in agronomical research under sub-tropical region. Paper presented at the XVII Annual Workshop of All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Sugarcane held at Poona, India, 20–30 September, 1989.Google Scholar
Yadav, R. L. & Singh, K. (1986). Effect of pit dimensions and seed rate on rooting pattern and yield of sugarcane in ring planting system. Biological Memoirs 12:133–137.Google Scholar