Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:32:10.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Planting Density on the Yield Components of Oil Palm (Elaeis Guineensis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

C. J. Breure ,
T. Menendez  and
M. S. Powell
C. J. Breure
Affiliation:
Dami Oil Palm Research Station, Kimbe, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea
T. Menendez
Affiliation:
Dami Oil Palm Research Station, Kimbe, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea
M. S. Powell
Affiliation:
Dami Oil Palm Research Station, Kimbe, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Yield components in oil palm were recorded in a spacing experiment comparing 56, 110, 148 and 186 palms ha−1. The higher densities reduced the number of female inflorescences (due to a decrease in the proportion of female to total inflorescences and an increase in the proportion of leaves with aborted inflorescences), the weight of the frame and the number of flowers per inflorescence. The results suggest that the production of seed per bunch can be increased by at least 15% by thinning around selected palms in seed gardens. The sex ratio and the components of flower number per inflorescence were more sensitive to competition for light than the weight of the frame and floral abortion. Components determining the oil and kernel extraction showed no response to density when assisted pollination was used, but with the successful introduction of insect pollinators, oil and kernel extraction increased with planting density as a result of an increase in fruit per bunch.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 117 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaak, G., Sparnaaij, L. D. & Menendez, T. (1963). Breeding and inheritance of the oil palm. Part II. Methods of bunch quality analysis. Journal of the West African Institute for Oil Palm Research 4:145–155.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J. (1977). Preliminary results from an oil palm density × fertilizer experiment on young volcanic soils in West New Britain. In International Developments in Oil Palm, 192–207 (Eds Earp, D. A. and Newall, W.). Kuala Lumpur: Incorporated Society of Planters.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J. (1978). Research Report, Dami Oil Palm Research Station 1971–1977.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J. (1982). Factors affecting yield and growth of oil palm tenera in West New Britain. Oléagineux 37:37–213.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J. (1985). Relevant factors associated with crown expansion in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Euphytica 34:161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breure, C. J. & Menendez, T. M. (1990). The determination of bunch yield components in the development of inflorescences in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Experimental Agriculture 26:99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, R. H. V., Hew, C. K., Tam, T. K. & Lo, K. K. (1973). Optimal spacing for oil palm. In Advances in Oil Palm Cultivation, 52–69 (Eds Wastie, R. L. and Earp, D. A.). Kuala Lumpur: Incorporated Society of Planters.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. (1973). Oil palm physiology - A review. In Advances in Oil Palm Cultivation, 37–49 (Eds Wastie, R. L. and Earp, D. A.). Kuala Lumpur: Incorporated Society of Planters.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. (1977). Effects of severe leaf pruning on oil palm, and its possible use for selection purposes. MARDI Research Bulletin 4:23–28.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. & Hew, C. K. (1976). Pruning. In Oil Palm Research, 307–313 (Eds Corley, R. H. V.Hardon, J. J. and Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hardon, J. J., Williams, C. N. & Watson, I. (1969). Leaf area and yield in the oil palm in Malaysia. Experimental Agriculture 5:25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prevot, P. & Duchesne, J. (1955). Densités de plantation pour le palmier à huile. Oléagineux 10:117–122.Google Scholar
Sly, J. M. A. & Chapas, L. S. (1963). The effect of various spacings on the first sixteen years of growth and production of the Nigerian oil palm under plantation conditions. Journal of the West African Institute for Oil Palm Research 4:31–45.Google Scholar