Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:58:42.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Molybdenum on Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. Var Botrytis) in Sand Nutrient Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

K. P. Singh  and
C. B. S. Rajput
K. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
C. B. S. Rajput
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

One ppm molybdenum produced the greatest height, fresh and dry weight per plant; number, fresh and dry weight of leaves; diameter, length, fresh and dry weight of stem; length, fresh and dry weight of roots; yield and yield-attributing characters (height, diameter, fresh and dry weight of curd), and N content of component parts of cauliflower plants (curd, leaf, stem and root). The lowest values for these characters were obtained in the control (nil Mo). Reducing and non-reducing sugars and vitamin C (ascorbic acid) were favourably enhanced (0·5 ppm Mo). The lowest values for sugars and ascorbic acid were observed under 1·0 ppm and nil Mo respectively. The quadratic response curve was drawn in terms of fresh weight of curd and rates of molybdenum application.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 195 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwala, S. C. & Hewitt, E. J. (1954). Long Ashton Res. Stat. Rep. for 1953, 209.Google Scholar
Agarwala, S. C. & Hewitt, E. J. (1955). J. Hort. Sci. 30, 151.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. J. (1956). Adv. Agron. 8, 63.Google Scholar
Bottini, E. & Marsella, R. (1952). Sper. Agr. 6, 1659.Google Scholar
Datta, N. P. & Raj, H. G. (1953). Nature, 171, 135.Google Scholar
Hewitt, E. J., Agarwala, S. C. & Williams, A. H. (1956). J. Hort. Sci. 32, 34.Google Scholar
Hewitt, E. J. & Bolle-Jones, E. W. (1952). J. Hort. Sci. 27, 245.Google Scholar
Hewitt, E. J. & McMcready, C. C. (1953). Long Ashton Res. Stat. Rep. for 1952, 209.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D. R. & Arnon, D. I. (1950). Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ., 347.Google Scholar
Plant, W. (1953). Trans. Int. Soc. Soil Sci. Comm. II & IV, 176.Google Scholar
Prakash, V. & Bhardwaj, S. N. (1965). Indian J. Hort. 22, 249.Google Scholar
Turner, F. & McCall, W. W. (1957). Quart. Bull., Mich. Agric. Exp. Stat., 40, 268.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. & Takahashi, E. (1953). Agron. J. 45, 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar