Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:48:04.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECT OF LIME AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER ON ACID SOILS AND BARLEY (HORDEUM VULGARE L.) PERFORMANCE IN THE CENTRAL HIGHLANDS OF ETHIOPIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2016

TEMESGEN DESALEGN ,
GETACHEW ALEMU ,
AYALEW ADELLA ,
TOLESSA DEBELE  and
JULIÁN GONZALO J.
TEMESGEN DESALEGN*
Affiliation:
Holetta Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), P.O. Box, 2003, A.A, Ethiopia Department Vegetable Production and Forest Resources, University of Valladolid.Avda. de Madrid 44, 34004, Palencia, Spain
GETACHEW ALEMU
Affiliation:
Holetta Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), P.O. Box, 2003, A.A, Ethiopia
AYALEW ADELLA
Affiliation:
Holetta Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), P.O. Box, 2003, A.A, Ethiopia
TOLESSA DEBELE
Affiliation:
Holetta Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), P.O. Box, 2003, A.A, Ethiopia
JULIÁN GONZALO J.
Affiliation:
Department Vegetable Production and Forest Resources, University of Valladolid.Avda. de Madrid 44, 34004, Palencia, Spain
*
§Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]; Department Vegetable Production and Forest Resources, University of Valladolid. Avda. de Madrid 44, 34004, Palencia, Spain.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Low soil pH and associated soil infertility problems are considered to be amongst the major challenges to barley production in the highlands of Ethiopia. In response to this, an experiment was conducted at low soil pH (< 5 H2O) site on the effects of different levels of lime and phosphorus (P) fertilizer on soil pH, exchangeable aluminium (Al3+), grain yield and yield components of barley during 2010 and 2011 cropping seasons. The experiment comprised factorial combinations of five lime rates (0, 0.55, 1.1, 1.65 and 2.2 t ha−1) and four P rates (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg ha−1) in a randomized complete block design in three replications. The amount of lime that was applied at each level was calculated on the basis of Al3+. Results of soil analysis after 2 years of liming showed that liming significantly (P < 0.05) increased soil pH, and markedly reduced exchangeable Al3+. Liming at the rate of 0.55, 1.1, 1.65 and 2.2 t ha−1 decreased Al3+ by 0.88, 1.11, 1.20 and 1.19 mill equivalents per 100 g of soil, and increased soil pH by 0.48, 0.71, 0.85 and 1.1 units, respectively. Amongst the liming treatments, liming at the rate of 1.65 and 2.2 t ha−1 gave significantly (P < 0.05) the highest grain yield and yield components of barley. However, grain yield obtained by applications of 1.65 and 2.2 t ha−1 lime was statistically comparable. By additions of 10, 20 and 30 kg P ha−1, grain yield of barley increased by about 29, 55 and 66% as compared to control (without P). During 2010, however, the combined applications 1.65 t ha−1 lime and 30 kg P ha−1 gave 133% more grain yields of barley relative to control (without P and lime). Therefore, sustainable barley production on acid soils in the central highlands of Ethiopia should entail combined applications of both lime and P fertilizer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 432 - 444
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abeledo, L. G., Calderini, D. F. and Slafer, G. A. (2003). Genetic improvement of barley yield potential and its physiological determinants in Argentina (1944–1998). Euphytica 130:325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez, E., Viadé, A. and Fernández, M. L. (2009). Effect of liming with different sized limestone on the forms of aluminium in a Galician soil (NW Spain). Geoderma 152:1–8.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. M., Oelke, E. A. and Simmons, S. R. (2002). Growth and development guide for spring barley. University of Minnesota Extension. http://www.Extension.umn.edu.Google Scholar
Baethgen, W. T., Christianson, C. B. and Garcı´a Lamothe, A. (1995). Nitrogen fertilizer effects on growth, grain yield, and yield components of malting barley. Field Crops Research 43:87–99.Google Scholar
Barber, S. A. (1995). Phosphorus. In Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: A Mechanistic Approach, 202–230. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bishop, H. O. (2003). The ecology of earthworms and their impact on carbon distribution and chemical characteristics of soil. PhD Thesis submitted to University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.Google Scholar
Bolan, N. S., Adriano, D. and Curtin, D. (2003). Soil acidification and liming interactions with nutrient and heavy metal transformation and bioavailability. Advances in Agronomy 78:215–272.Google Scholar
Bona, L., Wright, R. J., Baligar, V. C. and Matuz, J. (1993). Screening wheat and other small grains for acid soil tolerance. Landscape and Urban Planning 27:175–178.Google Scholar
Bradford, M. A., Tordoff, G. M., Eggers, T., Jones, T. H. and Newington, J. E. (2002). Microbiota, fauna, and mesh size interactions in litter decomposition. Oikos 99:317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buri, M. M., Wakatsuki, T. and Issaka, R. N. (2005). Extent and management of low pH soils in Ghana. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 51:755–759.Google Scholar
Crawford, T. W., Singh, U. and Breman, H. (2008). Solving problems related to soil acidity in central Africa's great lakes region. International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development (IFDC) - USA.Google Scholar
CSA. (2011). Area and production of crops (private peasant holdings, Meher Season). V1. Statistical Bulletin. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Delhaize, E., Gruber, B. D. and Ryan, P. R. (2007). The roles of organic anion permeases in aluminium resistance and mineral nutrition. FEBS Letters 581:2255–2262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edmeades, D. C. and Ridley, A. M. (2003). Using lime to ameliorate topsoil and subsoil acidity. In Handbook of Soil Acidity, 297–336 (Ed Rengel, Z.). NewYork, Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Ernani, P. R., Bayer, C. and Maestri, L. (2002). Corn yield as affected by liming and tillage system on an acid Brazilian Oxisol. Agronomy Journal 94:305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fageria, N. K. and Baligar, V. C. (2008a). Aminorating soil acidity of tropical oxisols by liming for sustainable crop production. Advances in Agronomy 99:345–399.Google Scholar
Fageria, N. K. and Baligar, V. C. (2003b). Fertility management of tropical acid soils for sustainable crop production. In Handbook of Soil Acidity, 359–385 (Ed Rengel, Z.). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Fageria, N. K. and Santos, A. B. (2008). Influence of pH on productivity, nutrient use efficiency by dry bean, and soil phosphorus availability in a no-tillage sysetm. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 39:1016–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fageria, N. K. and Stone, L. F. (2004). Yield of common bean in no-tillage system with application of lime and zinc. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 39:73–78.Google Scholar
Farhoodi, A. and Coventry, D. R. (2008). Field crop responses to lime in the mid-north region of South Australia. Field Crops Research 108:45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2006). IUSS working group WRB. World reference base for soil resources 2006. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Foy, C. D. and Fleming, A. L. (1978). The physiology of plant tolerance to excess available aluminium and manganese in acid soils. In Crop Tolerance to Sub-optimal Land Conditions, 301–328 (Ed Jung, G. A.). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Freisen, D. K., Miller, M. H. and Juo, A. S. E. (1980). Liming and lime-phosphorus-zinc interactions in two Nigerian Ultisols. II. Effects of maize root and shoot growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44:1227–1232.Google Scholar
Gallardo, F., Borie, F., Alvear, L. and Baer, E. V. (1999). Evaluation of aluminum tolerance of three barley cultivars by two short-term screening methods and field experiments. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 45:713–719.Google Scholar
Garvin, D. F. and Carver, B. F. (2003). The role of the genotype in tolerance to acidity and aluminum toxicity. In Handbook of Soil Acidity, 387–406 (Ed Rengel, Z.). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Getachew, A. and Berhane, L. (2013). Soil test phosphorus calibration for malt barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) on nitisols of central highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Agricultural (Trindad) 90:177–187.Google Scholar
Haynes, R. J. (1982). Effects of liming on phosphate availability in acid soils: A critical review: Plant and Soil 68:289–308.Google Scholar
Haynes, R. J. and Ludecke, T. E. (1981). Yield root morphology and chemical composition of two pasture legumes as affected by lime and phosphorus applications to an acid soil. Plant and Soil 62:241–254.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, S., Wagamatsu, T., Sasaki, R. and Manu, P. O. (2000). Comparison of the amount of citric and malic acids in Al media of seven plant species and two cultivars each in five plant species. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 46:751–758.Google Scholar
Kamprath, E. J. (1984). Crop response to liming in the tropics. In Soil Acidity and Liming, 349–368 (Ed Adams, F.). Madison, Wisconsin: ASA.Google Scholar
Kariuki, S. K., Zhang, H., Schroder, J. L., Edwards, J., Payton, M., Carver, B. F., Raun, W. R. and Krenzer, E. G. (2007). Hard red winter wheat cultivar responses to a pH and aluminum concentration gradient. Agronomy Journal 99:88–98.Google Scholar
Kochian, L. V., Hoekenga, O. A. and Piñeros, M. A. (2004). How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55:459–493.Google Scholar
McLean, E. O. (1965). Aluminum. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical Methods, 978–998 (Ed Black, C. A.). Madison: ASA.Google Scholar
Meng, C., Xiaonan, L., Zhihong, C., Zhengyi, H. and Wanzhu, M. (2004). Long-term effects of lime application on soil acidity and crop yields on arid soil in Central Zhejiang. Plant and Soil 265:101–109.Google Scholar
Mesfin, A. (2007). Nature and management of acid soils in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 99.Google Scholar
Moir, J. L. and Moot, D. J. (2010). The effects of soil pH and liming on lucerne grown in South Island high country. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. Lincoln, New Zealand: NZGA, 72:191–196.Google Scholar
Negeri, A. (1984). The effect of liming and phosphorus application on the dry matter and grain yield of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown on red soils of Ghmibi and Nedjo weredas of wollega region, western Ethiopia. M.Sc. thesis Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Ortiz, R., Nurminiemi, M., Madsen, S., Rognli, O. A. and Bjornstad, A. (2002). Genetic gains in Nordic spring barley breeding over sixty years. Euphytica 126:283–289.Google Scholar
Pablo, P., Savin, R. and Slafer, G. A. (2004). Grain number and its relationship with dry matter, N and P in the spikes at heading in response to N x P fertilization in barley. Field Crops Research 90:245–254.Google Scholar
Polle, E. and Konzak, C. F. (1985). A single scale for determining Al tolerance levels in cereals. In Agronomy Abstracts, 6. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Prado, R. M., Natale, W. and Rozane, D. E. (2007). Soil-liming effects on the development and nutritional status of the carambola tree and its fruit-yielding capacity. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 38:493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS. (2001). Applied Statistics and SAS Programming Language, 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Schlede, H. (1989). Distribution of acid soils and liming materials in Ethiopia. Note No. 326. Ethiopian Institute of Geological Survey, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Scott, B. J., Conyers, M. K., Poile, G. J. and Cullis, B. R. (1999). Reacidification and reliming effects on soil properties and wheat yield. Australian Journal of Expertimental Agricultural 39:849–856.Google Scholar
Sumner, M. E. and Noble, A. D. (2003). Soil acidification: The world story. In Handbook of Soil Acidity, 1–28 (Ed Rengel, Z.). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Temesgen, D., Getachew, A., Tesfu, K., Tolessa, D. and Mesfin, T. (2011). Past and present soil acidity management research in Ethiopia. A review. Paper presnted at the ‘2nd National Soil and Water Management Workshop’, 28–31 January 2011, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Wang, J. P., Harsh, R., Guo-Ping, Z., Neville, M. and Zhou, M. X. (2006). Aluminium tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): Physiological mechanisms, genetics and screening methods. Journal of Zheijang University SCIENCE B 7:769–787.Google Scholar
Waigwa, M. W., Othieno, C. O. and Okalebo, J. R. (2003). Phosphorus availability as affected by the application of phosphate rock combined with organic materials to acid soils in Western Kenya. Experimental Agriculture 39:395–407.Google Scholar
Wang, N., Xu, R. K. and Li, J. Y. (2011). Amelioration of an acid ultisol by agricultural by-products. Land Degradation & Development 22:513–518.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Desalegn supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Desalegn supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Desalegn supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Desalegn supplementary material(File)
File 56.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Desalegn supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Desalegn supplementary material(File)
File 58.9 KB