Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T03:33:47.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DETERMINANTS OF THE DECISION TO ADOPT INTEGRATED SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BY SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN THE CENTRAL HIGHLANDS OF KENYA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

JAYNE MUGWE ,
DANIEL MUGENDI ,
MONICAH MUCHERU-MUNA ,
ROEL MERCKX ,
JONAS CHIANU  and
BERNARD VANLAUWE
JAYNE MUGWE*
Affiliation:
Kenya Forestry Research Institute, P.O. Box 20412-00200 Nairobi, Kenya
DANIEL MUGENDI
Affiliation:
Kenyatta University, School of Environmental Studies, Department of Environmental Sciences P.O Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
MONICAH MUCHERU-MUNA
Affiliation:
Kenyatta University, School of Environmental Studies, Department of Environmental Sciences P.O Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
ROEL MERCKX
Affiliation:
Katholeike Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
JONAS CHIANU
Affiliation:
Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT, c/o World Agroforestry Centre [ICRAF], U.N. Avenue, Gigiri, P.O. Box 30677-00100 Nairobi, Kenya
BERNARD VANLAUWE
Affiliation:
Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT, c/o World Agroforestry Centre [ICRAF], U.N. Avenue, Gigiri, P.O. Box 30677-00100 Nairobi, Kenya
*
†Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Declining soil fertility is a major cause of low per capita food production on smallholder farms of sub-Saharan Africa. This study attempted to provide an empirical explanation of the factors associated with farmers' decisions to adopt or not to adopt newly introduced integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) technologies consisting of combinations of organics and mineral fertilizer in Meru South district of the central highlands of Kenya. Out of 106 households interviewed, 46% were ‘adopters’ while 54% were ‘non-adopters’. A logistic regression model showed that the factors that significantly influenced adoption positively were farm management, ability to hire labour and months in a year households bought food for their families, while age of household head and number of mature cattle negatively influenced adoption. The implication of these results is that the adoption of ISFM practices could be enhanced through targeting of younger families where both spouses work on the farm full-time and food insecure households. It is also important to target farmers that lack access to other sources of soil fertility improvement. Examples include farmers that do not own cattle or those owning few and who, therefore, have limited access to animal manure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 61 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adesina, A. A., Coulibaly, D., Manyong, V. M., Sanginga, P. C., Mbila, D., Chianu, J. and Kamleu, G. (1999). Policy shifts and adoption of alley farming in West and central Africa. IITA and Meg Communication, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Bationo, A., Mokwunye, U., Vlek, P. L. G., Koala, S. and Shapiro, I. (2003). Soil fertility management for sustainable land use in the West African Sudano-Sahelian zone. In Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in Southern Africa: Taking Stock Of Progress, Proceedings of a Conference (8–11 October, 2002), Leopard Rock Hotel, Vumba, Zimbabwe, 253–292. Soil fertility Network and CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Bekele, S. and Holden, S. (1998). Resource degradation and adoption of land conservation technologies in the Ethiopian Highlands. A case study in Andit Tid, North Shewa. Agricultural Economics 18:233–147.Google Scholar
Chianu, J. N. and Tsuji, H. (2004). Determinants of farmers' decision to adopt or not adopt inorganic fertilizer in the savannas of northern Nigeria. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 70:293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIMMYT, (1993). The adoption of agricultural technology. A guide for survey design. Economics Programme. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Mexico DF.Google Scholar
Elad, R. L. and Houston, J. E. (2002). Seasonal labour constraints and intra-household dynamics in the female fields of southern Cameroon. Agricultural Economics 55:337–351.Google Scholar
Ervin, C. A. and Ervin, D. E. (1982). Factors affecting the use of land conservation practices: hypothesis, evidence and policy implications. Land Economics 58:277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gockowski, J. and Ndoumbe, J. (2004). The adoption of intensive horticulture in Southern Cameroon. Agricultural Economics 30:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaetzold, R., Schmidt, H., Hornet, Z. B. and Shisanya, C. A. (2006). Farm Management Handbook of Kenya. Natural Conditions and Farm Information. 2nd Edition. Vol.11/ C. Eastern Province. Ministry of Agriculture/GTZ, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Keil, A., Zeller, M. and Franzel, S. (2005). Improved tree fallows in smallholder maize production in Zambia: Do initial testers adopt the technology? Agroforestry Systems 64:225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapar, M. L. A. and Pandey, S. (1999). Adoption of soil conservation: The case of the Philippines uplands. Agricultural Economics 21:241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugwe, J., Mugendi, D., Odee, D. and Otieno, J. (2007). Evaluation of the potential of using nitrogen-fixing legumes in smallholder farms of Meru south district. In Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities, 503–510 (Eds Bationo, A., Waswa, B., Kihara, J. and Kimetu, J.). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Neupane, R. P., Sharma, K. R. and Thapa, G. P. (2002). Adoption of agroforestry in the hills of Nepal: a logistic regression analysis. Agricultural Systems 72:177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odera, M. M., Kimani, S. K. and Musembi, F. (2000). Factors influencing adoption of integrated use of manure and inorganic fertilizer in central highlands of Kenya. In Collaborative and Participatory Research for Sustainably Improved Livelihoods, Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Scientific conference, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) Nairobi, Kenya, 58–64.Google Scholar
Oluoch-Kosura, W. A., Marenya, P. P. and Nzuma, M. J. (2001). Soil fertility management in maize-based production systems in Kenya. Current options and future strategies. In Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference 11–15th February. pg 350–355.Google Scholar
Okuro, J. O., Muriithi, F. M., Mwangi, W., Verjuikl, H, Gethi, M. and Groote, H. (2002). Adoption of maize seed and fertilizer technologies in Embu district, Kenya. Mexico, DF: CIMMYT and Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI).Google Scholar
Pali, P. N., Delve, R. and Nkonya, E. (2003). Using linear programming to optimize the use of biomass transfer and improved fallow species in eastern Uganda. In Harnessing Crop Technologies to Alleviate Hunger and Poverty in Africa. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings 6:339–447.Google Scholar
Pilbeam, C. J., Mathema, S., Gregory, P. J. and Shakya, P. (2005). Soil fertility management in the mid hills of Nepal. Practices and perceptions: Agriculture and Human Values 22:243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polson, R. A. and Spenser, D. S. C. (1991). The technology adoption process in subsistence agriculture: The case of cassava in South Western Nigeria. Agricultural Systems 36:65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. 4th edn. New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, P. A. and Jama, B. A. (2002). Soil fertility replenishment takes off in East and southern Africa. In From Concept to Practice: Integrated Plant Nutrients Management in Sub-Saharan Africa, 23–46 (Eds Vanlauwe, B., Diels, J., Sanginga, N. and Merckx, R.). Wallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
Snapp, S., Kanyama-Phiri, G., Kamanga, B., Gilberts, R. and Wellard, K. (2002). Farmer and Researcher partnerships in Malawi: developing soil fertility technologies for the near term and far-term. Experimental Agriculture 38:411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, R. D., Coe, R., Allan, E. F. and Dale, I. C. (2004). Good Statistical Practice for Natural Resources Research. Wallingford, UK: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar