Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:16:09.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CREATING SYNERGIES BETWEEN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE AND CATTLE PRODUCTION IN CROP–LIVESTOCK FARMS: A STUDY CASE IN THE LAKE ALAOTRA REGION OF MADAGASCAR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

J. H. ANDRIARIMALALA ,
J. N. RAKOTOZANDRINY ,
A. L. H. ANDRIAMANDROSO ,
E. PENOT ,
K. NAUDIN ,
P. DUGUÉ ,
E. TILLARD ,
V. DECRUYENAERE  and
P. SALGADO
J. H. ANDRIARIMALALA
Affiliation:
Département Élevage, ESSA, Université d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar
J. N. RAKOTOZANDRINY
Affiliation:
Département Élevage, ESSA, Université d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar
A. L. H. ANDRIAMANDROSO
Affiliation:
Département Élevage, ESSA, Université d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar
E. PENOT
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR Innovation, F-34398 Montpellier, France
K. NAUDIN
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR Systèmes de Culture Annuels, F-34398 Montpellier, France
P. DUGUÉ
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR Innovation, F-34398 Montpellier, France
E. TILLARD
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR Systèmes d'Elevage Méditerranéens et Tropicaux, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France
V. DECRUYENAERE
Affiliation:
Centre wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W), Département Productions et Filières, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
P. SALGADO*
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR Systèmes d'Elevage Méditerranéens et Tropicaux, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Conservation agriculture (CA) has been promoted as a strategy to cope with deterioration in soil fertility, but its adoption on smallholder farms in tropical areas remains limited. In Madagascar, livestock production is facing shortages in forage especially during the dry season. The value of cover crops used in CA as livestock feed could be an incentive to make this form of agriculture more acceptable in rural areas. To do so, farmers must find a trade-off between the use of biomass from cover crops for animal production and its maintenance on the soil to meet CA's criteria. In this study, we evaluated the impact of biomass flows (cover crops and manure) between cropping and cattle production in crop–livestock farms in the Lake Alaotra region. Surveys among crop–livestock farmers were used to calculate feed concentrate and mineral fertilizer equivalents. Our results show that on average 42, 22 and 10% of biomass production (dry matter basis) of Brachiaria spp., Stylosanthes guianensis and Vicia villosa, respectively, are used for livestock feeding. The economic benefit in feed concentrate equivalent is between €73 and €723/year per farm. The use of manure contributes, just as CA, to improve soil fertility without using external fertilizing resources. The economic benefit in mineral fertilizer equivalent is between €116 and €2365/year per farm. The integration of CA and livestock production shows, beyond the agronomic advantages, an obvious economic benefit, which is essential to secure the Malagasy agricultural systems. Moreover, this economic benefit is another argument for the dissemination of CA practices in rural areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 352 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carsky, R. J., Douthwaite, B., Schulz, S., Sanginga, N., Manyong, V. M., Diels, J. and Keatinge, D. J. D. H. (2003). Lessons for appropriate soil management technology generation for the savannas and their application to the grain legume-cereal rotation system. Cahier Agriculture 12:227–233.Google Scholar
Erenstein, O. (2003). Smallholder conservation farming in the tropics and sub-tropics: A guide to the development and dissemination of mulching with crop residues and cover crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 100:17–37.Google Scholar
Fisher, J., Tozer, P. and Abrecht, D. (2012). Livestock in no-till cropping systems – a story of trade-offs. Animal Production Science 52 (4):197–214.Google Scholar
Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M. and Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Research, 114:23–34.Google Scholar
Govaerts, B., Sayre, K. D. and Deckers, J. (2005). Stable high yields with zero tillage and permanent bed planting. Field Crops Research 94:33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, P. R. (2007). Conservation agriculture: What is it and why is it important for future sustainable food production? Journal of Agricultural Science 145:127–137.Google Scholar
Husson, O., Charpentier, H., Naudin, K., Moussa, N., Michellon, R., Andrianasolo, H., Razanamparany, C., Rakotoarinivo, C., Rakotondramanana, E. F. and Seguy, L. (2009). Le choix des itinéraires techniques. In Manuel Pratique du Semis Direct à Madagascar, Vol. II, Chap. 2, 75 (Eds CIRAD, TAFA, GSDM, AFD, MAEP). Antananarivo, Madagascar: CIRAD.Google Scholar
Husson, O., Charpentier, H., Razanamparany, C., Moussa, N., Michellon, R., Naudin, K., Rakotoarinivo, C., Rakotondramanana, E. F. and Seguy, L. (2008). Vesce vélue: Vicia villosa, Fiches techniques plantes de couverture: légumineuses annuelles. In Manuel Pratique du Semis Direct à Madagascar, Vol. III, Chap. 3, 11 (Eds CIRAD, TAFA, GSDM, AFD, MAEP). Antananarivo, Madagascar: CIRAD.Google Scholar
Makinde, E. A., Saka, J. O. and Makinde, J. O. (2007). Economic evaluation of soil fertility management options on cassava-based cropping systems in the rain forest ecological zone of South Western Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2 (1):7–13.Google Scholar
Naudin, K. (2012). You can't eat your mulch and have it too. Cropping system design and tradeoffs around biomass use for Conservation Agriculture in Cameroon and Madagascar, p. 220. Thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Naudin, K., Scopel, E., Andriamandroso, L. H., Rakotosolofo, M., Ratsimbazafy, A., Rakotozandriny, J. N., Salgado, P. and Giller, K. E. (2011). Trade-offs between biomass use and soil cover. The case of rice-based cropping systems in the Lake Alaotra region of Madagascar. Experimental Agriculture 48:194–209.Google Scholar
Neto, M. S., Scopel, E., Corbeels, M., Cardoso, A. N., Douzet, J. M., Feller, C., Piccolo, M. D., Cerri, C. C. and Bernoux, M. (2010). Soil carbon stocks under no-tillage mulch-based cropping systems in the Brazilian Cerrado: An on-farm synchronic assessment. Soil and Tillage Research 110:187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penot, E., Fabre, J. and Domas, R. (2011). The real adoption of conservation agriculture (CA) in the lake Alaotra area after 10 years of diffusion. In World Congress of Conservation Agriculture. Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Penot, E., Husson, O. and Rakotondramanana, E. F. (2010). Les bases de calculs économiques pour l'évaluation des systèmes SCV. In Manuel Pratique du Semis Direct à Madagascar, Appendice II, 27 (Eds CIRAD, TAFA, GSDM, AFD, MAEP). Antananarivo, Madagascar: CIRAD.Google Scholar
Razafimbelo, T., Albrecht, A., Feller, C., Ravelojaona, H., Moussa, N., Razanamparany, C., Rakotoarinivo, C., Razafintsalama, H., Michellon, R., Naudin, K. and Rabeharisoa, L. (2010). Stockage de carbone dans les sols sous systèmes de culture en semis direct sous couvert végétal (SCV) dans différents contextes pédoclimatiques à Madagascar. Etude et Gestion des Sols 17:143–158.Google Scholar
Rufino, M. C., Rowe, E. C., Delve, R. J. and Giller, K. E. (2006). Nitrogen cycling efficiencies through resource-poor African crop-livestock systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112:261–282.Google Scholar
Salgado, P., Beauvais, C., Rakotorinina, N., Marquant, B., Lovaniaina, J., Rarivoarimanana, B., Nabeneza, S., Tillard, E., Decruyenaere, V. and Lecomte, Ph. (2011a). Valorisation du fumier. In Fiche Technique, 2 (Eds CIRAD). Antananarivo, Madagascar: CIRAD.Google Scholar
Salgado, P., Rarivoarimanana, B., Rakotorinina, N., Marquant, B., Nabeneza, S., Tillard, E. and Lecomte, Ph. (2011b). Ressources fourragères et alimentation des bovins. In Fiche Technique, 6 (Eds CIRAD). Antananarivo, Madagascar: CIRAD.Google Scholar
Scopel, E., Da Silva, F. A. M., Corbeels, M., Affholder, F. O. and Maraux, F. (2004). Modelling crop residue mulching effects on water use and production of maize under semi-arid and humid tropical conditions. Agronomie 24:383–395.Google Scholar
Smets, T., Poesen, J. and Knapen, A. (2008). Spatial scale effects on the effectiveness of organic mulches in reducing soil erosion by water. Earth-Science Reviews 89:1–12.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. (2000). The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Science 48:385–392.Google Scholar