Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T05:42:16.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPARISON OF APPROPRIATE TROPICAL SEED STORAGE TECHNIQUES FOR GERMPLASM CONSERVATION IN MOUNTAINOUS SUB-TROPICAL CLIMATES WITH RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

MARCIA CROFT ,
ABRAM BICKSLER ,
JAMES MANSON  and
RICK BURNETTE
MARCIA CROFT
Affiliation:
Educational Concerns for Hunger Organization (ECHO) Asia Impact Center Seed Bank, 121 M. 8 Tambon Maenawan, Ampur Mae Ai, Chiang Mai, Thailand50280
ABRAM BICKSLER*
Affiliation:
International Sustainable Development Studies Institute (ISDSI), 48/1 Superhighway (Chiang Mai-Lamphun Rd.), Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand50300
JAMES MANSON
Affiliation:
Educational Concerns for Hunger Organization (ECHO) Asia Impact Center Seed Bank, 121 M. 8 Tambon Maenawan, Ampur Mae Ai, Chiang Mai, Thailand50280
RICK BURNETTE
Affiliation:
Educational Concerns for Hunger Organization (ECHO) Asia Impact Center Seed Bank, 121 M. 8 Tambon Maenawan, Ampur Mae Ai, Chiang Mai, Thailand50280
*
§Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Changes in seed viability over 12 months of low-input storage conditions were monitored on five diverse seed species grown in the tropics: amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus), lablab bean (Lablab purpureus), moringa (Moringa oleifera), pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Because the costs of maintaining low-temperature storage can be prohibitively expensive in developing countries, this study explored alternatives to low-temperature storage at the Educational Concerns for Hunger Organization (ECHO) Asia Impact Center Seed Bank in Northern Thailand. Specifically, this research compared the effects of vacuum sealing and refrigeration on stored seed viability in both laboratory and field settings. While seed species was an influential factor in determining seed longevity, the relative importance of vacuum sealing and refrigeration differed for the dependent variables of seed moisture content, germination rate, mean time to 50% germination and field emergence. Although the combination of vacuum sealing and refrigeration was most effective at conserving seed quality as measured by each of these variables, the storage of seeds in vacuum-sealed packages at ambient temperatures was more effective than unsealed but refrigerated packets at conserving low moisture content and high germination and field emergence rates across species. This suggests that for resource-constrained seed banks in the tropics, vacuum sealing with or without refrigeration may represent a viable alternative to other expensive and energy-intensive storage techniques.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 279 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailly, C. (2004). Active oxygen species in seed biology. Seed Science Research 14:93–107.Google Scholar
Bradbeer, J. W. (1988). Seed Dormancy and Germination. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Chiu, K. Y., Chen, C. L. and Sung, J. M. (2003). Partial vacuum storage improves the longevity of primed sh-2 sweet corn seeds. Scientia Horticulturae 98:99–111.Google Scholar
Egli, D. B. and TeKrony, D. M. (1997). Species differences in seed water status during seed maturation and germination. Seed Science Research 7:3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. H. (1998). Longevity of seeds stored hermetically at low moisture contents. Seed Science Research 8 (1):9–10.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. (1985). Procedures for Handling Seeds in Genebanks: Practical Manuals for Genebanks: No. 1. Rome, Italy: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources.Google Scholar
Littell, R. C., Stroup, W. and Freund, R. J. (2002). SAS for Linear Models, 4th edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. B. (1999). Seed deterioration: physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Science and Technology 27:177–237.Google Scholar
Rao, N. K., Hanson, J., Dulloo, M. E., Ghosh, K., Nowell, D. and Larinde, M. (2006). Manual of Seed Handling in Genebanks. Handbooks for Genebanks No. 8. Rome, Italy: Biodiversity International.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. H. (1973). Predicting the storage life of seeds. Seed Science and Technology 1:499–514.Google Scholar
Sastry, D. V. S. S. R., Upadhyaya, H. D. and Gowda, C. L. L. (2007). Survival of groundnut seeds under different storage conditions. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Ejournal 5 (1):1–3.Google Scholar
Saxton, A. M. (1998). A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. In Proceedings 23rd SAS Users Group International, Nashville, TN, 22–25 March, 1243–1246. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
TeKrony, D. M. and Egli, D. B. (1977). Relationship between laboratory indices of soybean seed vigor and field emergence. Crop Science 17:573–577.Google Scholar
Yeh, Y. M., Chiu, K. Y., Chen, C. L. and Sung, J. M. (2005). Partial vacuum extends the longevity of primed biter gourd seeds by enhancing their anti-oxidative activities during storage. Scientia Horticulturae 104:101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, X.Y., Chen, R. Z., Fu, J. R. and Zhang, X.W. (1998). The effects of water content during storage on physiological activity of cucumber seeds. Seed Science Research 8 (1):65–68.Google Scholar