Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:39:38.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Border Effects in Rice Experimental Plots I. Unplanted Borders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Kwanchai A. Gomez  and
S. K. De Datta
Kwanchai A. Gomez
Affiliation:
The International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines
S. K. De Datta
Affiliation:
The International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In experiments with transplanted rice, the first row next to the unplanted alley consistently gave significantly higher grain yields than the centre rows. The increase was progressively higher as the width of the unplanted alley between plots was increased up to 100 cm., but where the increase was very large, yields of the second outermost row were significantly decreased. No evidence was found that border effects reach beyond the second outermost row. Varieties that differed in tillering capacity, plant height, or both responded differently to the unplanted borders.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 87 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arny, A. C. & Hayes, H. K. (1918). J. Agric. Res. 15, 251.Google Scholar
Bhalli, M. A., Day, A. D., Tucker, H., Thompson, R. K. & Massey, G. D. (1964). Agron. J. 56, 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. M. & Weibel, R. O. (1957). Agron. J. 49, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollowell, E. A. & Heusinkveld, D. (1933). J. Am. Soc. Agron. 25, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, C. K. (ig). J. Am. Soc. Agron. 26, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRostie, G. P. & Hamilton, R. I. (1927). J. Am. Soc. Agron. 19, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. G. & Mountier, N. S. (1955). N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. 37 (A), 287.Google Scholar
Probst, A. H. (1943). J. Am. Soc. Agron. 35, 662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiancko, A. T., Salmon, S. C., Arny, A. C., Love, H. H. & Mooers, C. A. (1924). J. Am. Soc. Agron. 16, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar