Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:28:39.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ASSESSMENT OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR EGGPLANT PRODUCTION UNDER SUBTROPICAL CONDITIONS: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2016

K. BATABYAL ,
B. MANDAL ,
D. SARKAR  and
S. MURMU
K. BATABYAL*
Affiliation:
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, Kalyani, West Bengal, 741 235, India
B. MANDAL
Affiliation:
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, Kalyani, West Bengal, 741 235, India
D. SARKAR
Affiliation:
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, Kalyani, West Bengal, 741 235, India
S. MURMU
Affiliation:
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, Kalyani, West Bengal, 741 235, India
*
†Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We developed a protocol for comprehensive evaluation of nutrient management (NM) technologies for production of eggplant taking its yield, produce quality, profitability, energy balance and environmental sustainability in terms of upkeeping soil quality as the goal variables. Fifteen NM technologies comprising of three sources of nutrients viz., organics [vermicompost (VC), farmyard manure (FYM) and mustard oil cake (MOC)], inorganic fertilizations [recommended N–P–K at the rate of 100–22–42 kg ha−1 and 150% of recommended N–P–K (NPK^)] and their selected combinations were tested for growing the plants. Integrated NM technology was proved to be socio-economically sound and environment-friendly practice. It helped to upkeep soil quality by improving soil organic carbon stock, microbial biomass carbon, bulk density and available nutrients in soils. Combining all the parameters by employing non-parametric evaluation of regression factor scores through principal component analysis, the NM technology of VC3 Mg ha−1+NPK^ was found to be the best when considering the marketable fruits (12.27 Mg ha−1), economic return (benefit-cost ratio 3.3; marginal rate of return 8.7), energy conserving efficiency (net energy 113.8 GJ ha−1), soil and crop quality for human welfare. Only organics were less productive and profitable, and energetically less efficient than the integrated and inorganic NM systems and as such may not be sustainable for eggplant production in subtropical India.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 588 - 608
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, S. S. and Carrol, C. R. (2001). Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecological Applications 11:1573–1585.Google Scholar
AOAC. (1995). Official Methods of Analysis, vol 16 Method 967.21. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Atiyeh, R. M., Lee, S. S., Edwards, C. A., Arancon, N. Q. and Metzger, J. (2002). The influence of humic acid derived from earthworm processed organic waste on plant growth. Bioresource Technology 84:7–14.Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, P. K., Saha, S., Mani, P. K. and Mandal, B. (2010). Effect of organic inputs on aggregate associated organic carbon concentration under long-term rice-wheat cropping system. Geoderma 154:379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basak, N., Datta, A., Mitran, T., Roy, S. S., Saha, B., Biswas, S. and Mandal, B. (2016). Assessing soil-quality indices for subtropical rice-based cropping systems in India. Soil Research 54:20–29.Google Scholar
Batabyal, K. (2011). Optimizing yield and quality of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis), brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) and radish (Raphanus sativus L.) through nutrient management practices. PhD Thesis, Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India.Google Scholar
Batabyal, K., Mandal, B. and Hazra, G. C. (2016a). Nutrient management, energy input-output and economic analyses of eggplant production under subtropical conditions. International Journal of Vegetable Science 22:409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batabyal, K., Mandal, B., Sarkar, D., Murmu, S., Tamang, A., Das, I., Hazra, G. C. and Chattopadhyay, P. S. (2016b). Comprehensive assessment of nutrient management technologies for cauliflower production under subtropical conditions. European Journal of Agronomy, 79:1–13.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, T., Pal, D. K., Chandran, P., Mandal, C., Ray, S. K., Gupta, R. K. and Gajbhiye, K. S. (2004). Managing Soil Carbon Stocks in the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. New Delhi: RWC-CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Blake, G. R. and Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed., 363–375 (Ed Klute, A.). Agron. Monogr. 9. Madison, WI: ASA and SSSA.Google Scholar
Bray, H. and Thorpe, W. V. (1954). Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism. Methods Biochemical Analysis 1:27–52.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. D. and Pratt, P. F. (1961). Method of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters. Riverside: Agr Publ Univ of Calif.Google Scholar
Choudhary, M. R., Talukdar, N. C. and Saikia, A. (2005). Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and productivity of brinjal. Research on Crops 6:551–554.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. T. (1994). The potential use of soil biotic activity as an indicator of productivity, sustainability and pollution. In Soil Biota: Management in Sustainable Farming Systems, 250–256 (Eds Pankhurst, C. E., Doube, B. M., Gupta, V. V. S. R. and Grace, P. R.). Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Evans, E. (2005). Marginal Analysis: An Economic Procedure for Selecting Alternative Technologies/Practices. Gainsville, FL: Department of Food and Resource Economics, Florida Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida.Google Scholar
Gelfand, I., Snapp, S. S. and Robertson, G. P. (2010). Energy efficiency of conventional, organic, and alternative cropping systems for food and fuel at a site in the U.S. Midwest. Environmental Science and Technology 44:4006–4011.Google Scholar
Guimaraes, P. R., Galvao, A. M., Batista, C. M., Azevedo, G. S., Oliveira, R. D., Lamounier, R., Freire, N., Barros, A., Sakurai, E., Oliveira, J., Vieira, E. and Alvarez-Leite, J. (2000). Eggplant (Solanummelongena) infusion has a modest and transitory effect on hypercholesterolemic subjects. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 33:1027–1036.Google Scholar
Herencia, J. F., Ruiz, J. C., Morillo, E., Melerol, S., Villaverde, J. and Maqueda, C. (2008). The effect of organic and mineral fertilization on micronutrient availability in soil. Soil Science 173:69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrick, J. E. (2000). Soil quality: An indicator of sustainable land management. Applied Soil Ecology 15:75–83.Google Scholar
Islam, M. M., Karim, A. J. M. S., Jahiruddin, M., Majid, N. K., Miah, M. G. and Islam, M. S. (2013). Integrated nutrient management for cabbage-brinjal-red amaranth cropping pattern in homestead area. Journal of Plant Nutrition 36:1678–1694.Google Scholar
Kage, H., Alt, C. and Stutzel, H. (2003). Aspects of nitrogen use efficiency of cauliflower II. Productivity and N partitioning as influenced by N supply. Journal Agricultural Sciences 141:17–29.Google Scholar
Kashyap, S., Kumar, S., Maji, S. and Kumar, D. (2014). Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) cv. Pant Rituraj. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 10:305–308.Google Scholar
King, H. G. C. and Heath, G. W. (1967). The chemical analysis of small samples of leaf materials and the relationship between the disappearance and composition of leaves. Pedobiologia 7:192–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Y. I., Apostolidis, E. and Shetty, K. (2008). In vitro studies of eggplant (Solanum melongena) phenolics as in-hibitors of key enzymes relevant for type-2 diabetes and hypertension. Bioresource Technology 99:2981–2988.Google Scholar
Lester, G. E. and Saftner, R. A. (2011). Organically versus conventionally grown produce: Common production inputs, nutritional quality, and nitrogen delivery between the two systems. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 59:10401–10406.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. L. and Norvell, W. A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42:421–428.Google Scholar
Majumder, B., Mandal, B., Bandyopadhyay, P. K., Gangopadhyay, A., Mani, P. K. and Kundu, A. L. (2008). Organic amendments influence soil organic carbon pools and rice-wheat productivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72:775–785.Google Scholar
Malik, A. A., Chattoo, M. A., Sheemar, G. and Rashid, R. (2011). Growth, yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper hybrid SH-SP-5 (Capsicum annuum L.) as affected by integration of inorganic fertilizers and organic manures (FYM). Journal of Agricultural Technology 7:1037–1048.Google Scholar
Mandal, B. (2005). Assessment and improvement of soil quality and resilience for rainfed production system. Completion Report, National Agricultural Technology Project, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Mandal, B., Majumder, B., Adhya, T. K., Bandyopadhyay, P. K., Gangopadhyay, A., Sarkar, D., Kundu, M. C., Gupta Choudhury, S., Hazra, G. C., Kundu, S., Samantaray, R. N. and Misra, A. K. (2008). Potential of double-cropped rice ecology to conserve organic carbon under subtropical climate. Global Change Biology 14:2139–2151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, D. A. C. and Renforth, P. (2013). Passive sequestration of atmospheric CO2 through coupled plant-mineral reactions in urban soils. Environmental Science and Technology 47:135–141.Google Scholar
Meena, S. S., Dhaka, R. S. and Jalwania, R. (2005). Economics of plant growth nutrients in eggplant under semi-aridconditions of Rajasthan. Agriculture Science Digest 25:248–250.Google Scholar
Moraditochaee, M. (2012). Research energy indices of eggplant production in north of Iran. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 7:484–487.Google Scholar
Moreno, M. M., Lacasta, C., Meco, R. and Moreno, C. (2011). Rainfed crop energy balance of different farming systems and crop rotations in a semi-arid environment: Results of a long term trial. Soil and Tillage Research 114:18–27.Google Scholar
Moscatelli, M. C., Lagomarsino, A., Marinari, S., De Angelis, P. and Grego, S. (2005). Soil microbial indices as bioindicators of environmental changes in a poplar plantation. Ecological Indicators 5:171–179.Google Scholar
Nanthakumar, S. and Veeragavathatham, D. (2000). Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth parameters and yield of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) cv. PLR-1. South Indian Horticulture 48 (6):31–35.Google Scholar
Nielsen, D. (1998). Food Analysis. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers, Inc. Maryland United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Noda, Y., Kaneyuki, T., Igarashi, K., Moriand, A. and Pacer, L. (1998). Antioxidant activity of nasunin, an anthocyanin in eggplant. Research Communications in Molecular Pathology and Pharmacology 102:175–187.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. and Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture Circular 939.Google Scholar
Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. and Keeney, D. R. (ed.). (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. Madison, WI: ASA and SSSA.Google Scholar
Panesar, B. S. and Bhatnagar, A. P. (1987). Energy norms for inputs and outputs of agricultural sector- ISAE Monograph Series No. 1: Energy in Production Agriculture and Food Processing. Proceedings of the National Conference, India, 30–31 October, 8–26.Google Scholar
Parker, D. R. and Gardner, E. H. (1981). The determination of hot water soluble boron in some acid Oregon soils using a modified azomethine-H procedure. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 12:1311–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raigon, M. D., Rodríguez-Burruezo, A. and Prohens, J. (2010). Effects of organic and conventional cultivation methods on composition of eggplant fruits. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 58:6833–6840.Google Scholar
Rathke, G. W., Wienhold, B. J., Wilhelm, W. W. and Diepenbrock, W. (2007). Tillage and rotation effect on corn-soybean energy balances in eastern Nebraska. Soil and Tillage Research 97:60–70.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. P. and Brar, J. S. (2008). Nutritional requirements of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.)-a review. Agricultural Reviews 29 (2):79–88.Google Scholar
Sharma, R. P., Sharma, A. and Sharma, J. K. (2005). Productivity, nutrient uptake, soil fertility and economics as affected by chemical fertilizers and farmyard manure in broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) in an Entisol. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 75:576–579.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Verma, S. R. and Mittal, J. P. (1997). Energy requirements for production of major crops in India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America 28 (4):13–17.Google Scholar
Smith, J. L. and Paul, E. A.(1990). The significance of soil microbial biomass estimation. In Soil Biochemistry, vol. 6, 357–396 (Eds Ballag, J. M. and Stotzky, G.). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff. (2003). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA), Agriculture Handbook, vol. 436. Washington DC.Google Scholar
Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., Loeppert, R. H., Soltanpour, P. N., Tabatabai, M. A., Johnston, C. T. and Summer, M. E. (Eds). (1996). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Subbiah, B. V. and Asija, G. L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25:259–260.Google Scholar
Tamang, A. (2010). Integrated nutrient management for improvement of yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), pointed gourd (Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.) and broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italic Plenk.). Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India.Google Scholar
Tian, G., Kang, B. T. and Brussard, L. (1992). Biological effects of plant residues with contrasting chemical composition under humid tropical conditions - decomposition and nutrient release. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24:1051–1060.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. and Wine, R. H.(1968). Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid detergent fibre with permanganate. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists 51:780–785.Google Scholar
Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C. and Jenkinson, D. S. (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19:703–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, A., Singh, K., Gupta, S. and Singh, S. P. (2013). Study the yield and net return of eggplant (Solanum melonglena) in different areas. Plant Archives 13:995–996.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. J. and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37:29–38.Google Scholar
Wood, R. (1988). The Whole Foods Encyclopedia, New York: Prentice-Hall Press.Google Scholar
Worthington, V. (2001). Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables, and grains. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 7:161–173.Google Scholar
Zentner, R. P., Lafond, G. P., Derksen, D. A., Nagy, C. N., Wall, D. D. and May, W. E. (2004). Effects of tillage method and crop rotation on non-renewable energy use efficiency for a thin black chernozem in the Canadian prairies. Soil and Tillage Research 77:125–136.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Batabyal supplementary material

Batabyal supplementary material 1

Download Batabyal supplementary material(File)
File 23.8 KB