Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T20:13:43.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN ASSESSMENT OF PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SYSTEM OF RICE INTENSIFICATION (SRI) PRACTICES COMPARED WITH RECOMMENDED RICE CULTIVATION PRACTICES IN INDIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

A. K. THAKUR ,
NORMAN UPHOFF  and
EDNA ANTONY
A. K. THAKUR*
Affiliation:
Water Technology Centre for Eastern Region, Bhubaneswar-751023, Orissa, India
NORMAN UPHOFF
Affiliation:
Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
EDNA ANTONY
Affiliation:
Water Technology Centre for Eastern Region, Bhubaneswar-751023, Orissa, India
*
§Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An evaluation was conducted in eastern India over three years, 2005–2007, to compare the performance of certain System of Rice Intensification (SRI) practices: transplanting single, young (10-day-old) seedlings in a square pattern; no continuous flooding; and use of a mechanical weeder – with those currently endorsed by the Central Rice Research Institute of India, referred to here as recommended management practices (RMP). All plots received the same fertilization, a combination of organic and inorganic nutrients, and the SRI spacing used was 20% less than usually recommended. Accordingly, the results reported here are designated as a modification of SRI recommendations (SRIm). The objective of this research was to understand the benefits in terms of yield and other physiological parameters, if any, from using most if not all recommended SRI practices compared to RMP. These selected SRI practices out-yielded RMP by 42%, with the higher yield associated with various phenotypical alterations, which are reported here. Significant measurable changes were observed in physiological processes and plant characteristics, such as longer panicles, more grains panicle−1 and higher % of grain-filling. The decreased plant density with SRIm management was compensated for by increased per-plant productivity. SRIm hills with single plants were found to have deeper and better-distributed root systems, higher xylem exudation rates, more open plant architecture with more erect and larger leaves, and more tillers than did RMP hills having multiple plants. Due to the reduction in number of hills m−2 in SRIm plots compared to RMP, no significant difference was found in root dry weight or leaf number, tillers or panicle number on an area basis. Nevertheless, in spite of SRIm having fewer hills and fewer tillers per unit area, the leaf area index (LAI) with SRIm practice was greater due to larger leaves. These together with altered plant architecture, contributed to more light interception by SRIm plants. The higher leaf chlorophyll content at ripening stage reflected delayed senescence and the greater fluorescence efficiency (Fv/Fm and ФPS II) associated with SRIm practices contributed to more efficient utilization of light and a higher rate of photosynthesis, which was probably responsible for the observed increase in grain filling and heavier grains compared to RMP plants. The higher photosynthesis rate coupled with lower transpiration in SRIm plants indicated that they were using water more efficiently than did RMP plants. The latter produced 1.6 μ mol CO2 fixed per m mol water transpired, compared to 3.6 μ mol CO2 in SRIm plants.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 77 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ceesay, M., Reid, W. S., Fernandes, E. C. M. and Uphoff, N. (2006). The effects of repeated soil wetting and drying on lowland rice yield with System of Rice Intensification (SRI) methods. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 4:5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Counce, P. A., Keisling, T. C. and Mitchell, A. J. (2000). A uniform, objective, and adaptive system for expressing rice development. Crop Science 40:436–443.Google Scholar
Dobermann, A. (2004). A critical assessment of the system of rice intensification (SRI). Agricultural Systems 79:261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DRD (2006). Rice varieties released/ notified during 1996–2005. Directorate of Rice Development, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India.Google Scholar
Genty, B., Briantais, J - M. and Baker, N. R. (1989). The relationship between quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 990:87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. John Wiley, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Harper, A. L., Gesjen, S. E., Linford, A. S., Peterson, M. P., Faircloth, R. S., Thissen, M. M. and Brusslan, J. A. (2004). Chlorophyllide a oxygenase mRNA and protein levels correlate with the chlorophyll a/b ratio in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynthesis Research 79:149–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hipkins, M. F. and Baker, N. R. (1986). Photosynthesis: Energy Transduction, a Practical Approach. Oxford: IRL Press.Google Scholar
Hiscox, J. D. and Israelstam, R. (1979). A method of extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany 57:1332–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabir, H. and Uphoff, N. (2007). Results of disseminating the system of rice intensification with farmer field school methods in Northern Myanmar. Experimental Agriculture 43:463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katayama, T. (1951). Studies on the Tillering of Rice, Wheat and Barley (Ine mugi no bungetsu kenkyu). Yokendo, Tokyo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Kawata, S. and Katano, M. (1976). On the direction of the crown root growth of rice plants. Crop Science Society of Japan 45:471–483.Google Scholar
Latif, M. A., Islam, M. R., Ali, M. Y. and Saleque, M. A. (2005). Validation of the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Bangladesh. Field Crops Research 93:281–292.Google Scholar
Laulanié, H. (1993). Le système de riziculture intensive malgache. Tropicultura 11:110–114.Google Scholar
Leong, T - Y. and Anderson, J. M. (1984). Adaptation of the thylakoid membranes of the pea chloroplasts to light intensities. I. Study on the distribution of chlorophyll–protein complexes. Photosynthesis Research 5:105–115.Google Scholar
Matsuo, T., Futsuhara, Y., Kukuchi, F. and Yamaguchi, H. (1997). Science of the Rice Plant, Vol. 3. Tokyo: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center.Google Scholar
Maxwell, K. and Johnson, G. N. (2000). Chlorophyll fluorescence: A practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51:659–668.Google Scholar
McDonald, A. J., Hobbs, P. R. and Riha, S. J. (2006). Does the system of rice intensification outperform conventional best management? A synopsis of the empirical record. Field Crops Research 96:31–36.Google Scholar
McDonald, A. J., Hobbs, P. R. and Riha, S. J. (2008). Stubborn facts: Still no evidence that the system of rice intensification out-yields best management practices (BMPs) beyond Madagascar. Field Crops Research 108:188–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murchie, E. H. and Horton, P. (1997). Acclimation of photosynthesis to irradiance and spectral quality in British plant species: Chlorophyll content, photosynthetic capacity and habitat preference. Plant Cell & Environment 20:438–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namara, R., Bossio, D., Weligamage, P. and Herath, I. (2008). The practice and effects of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Sri Lanka. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 47:1, 5–23.Google Scholar
Nemoto, K., Morita, S. and Baba, T. (1995). Shoot and root development in rice related to the phyllochron. Crop Science 35:24–29.Google Scholar
Ookawa, T., Naruoka, Y., Sayama, A. and Hirasawa, T. (2004). Cytokinin effects on ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and nitrogen partitioning in rice during ripening. Crop Science 44:2107–2115.Google Scholar
Randriamiharisoa, R., Barison, J. and Uphoff, N. (2006). Soil biological contributions to the System of Rice Intensification. In: Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems, Uphoff, N. et al. , eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 409–424.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, T., Morinaka, Y., Ohnishi, T., Sunohara, H., Fujioka, S., Ueguchi-Tanaka, M., Mizutani, M., Sakata, K., Takatsuto, S., Yoshida, S., Tanaka, H., Kitano, H. and Matsuoka, M. (2006). Erect leaves caused by brassinosteroid deficiency increase biomass production and grain yield in rice. Nature Biotechnology 24:105–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
San-oh, Y., Mano, Y., Ookawa, T. and Hirasawa, T. (2004). Comparison of dry matter production and associated characteristics between direct-sown and transplanted rice plants in a submerged paddy field and relationships to planting patterns. Field Crops Research 87:43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San-oh, Y., Sugiyama, T., Yoshita, D., Ookawa, T. and Hirasawa, T. (2006). The effect of planting pattern on the rate of photosynthesis and related processes during ripening in rice plants. Field Crops Research 96:113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, S. and Uphoff, N. (2007). A review of on-farm evaluation of system of rice intensification (SRI) methods in eastern Indonesia. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2:54. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Satyanarayana, A., Thiyagarajan, T. M. and Uphoff, N. (2007). Opportunities for water saving with higher yield from the system of rice intensification. Irrigation Science 25:99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senthilkumar, K., Bindraban, P. S., Thiyagarajan, T. M., Ridder, N. and Giller, K. E. (2008). Modified rice cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India: Yield gains and farmers’ (lack of) acceptance. Agricultural Systems 98: 82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, J. E., Peng, S., Dobermann, A., Mitchell, P. L., Ferrer, A., Yang, J., Zou, Y., Zhong, X. and Huang, J. (2004). Fantastic yields in the system of rice intensification: Fact or fallacy? Field Crops Research 88:1–8.Google Scholar
Sheehy, J. E., Sinclair, T. R. and Cassman, K. G. (2005). Curiosities, nonsense, non-science and SRI. Field Crops Research 91:355–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. (2004). Agronomic UFOs waste valuable scientific resources. Rice Today 3:43.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. and Cassman, K. G. (2004). Agronomic UFOs. Field Crops Research 88:9–10.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. and Sheehy, J. E. (1999). Erect leaves and photosynthesis in rice. Science 283:1455.Google Scholar
Sinha, S. K. and Talati, J. (2007). Productivity impacts of the system of rice intensification (SRI): A case study in West Bengal, India. Agricultural Water Management 87:55–60.Google Scholar
Soejima, H., Sugiyama, T. and Ishihara, K. (1992). Changes in cytokinin activities and mass spectrometric analysis of cytokinins in root exudates of rice plant (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Physiology 100:1724–1729.Google Scholar
Soejima, H., Sugiyama, T. and Ishihara, K. (1995). Changes in the chlorophyll contents of leaves and in levels of cytokinins in root exudates during ripening of rice cultivars Nipponbare and Akenohoshi. Plant and Cell Physiology 36:1105–1114.Google Scholar
Stoop, W. A., Uphoff, N. and Kassam, A. (2002). A review of agricultural research issue raised by the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving system for resource poor farmers. Agricultural Systems 71:249–274.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Makino, A. and Mae, T. (2001). Changing in the turnover of Rubisco and levels of mRNAs of rbcL and rbcS in rice leaves from emergence to senescence. Plant Cell & Environment 24:1353–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, L. X., Wang, X. and Min, S. K. (2002). Physiological effects of SRI methods on the rice plant. In: Uphoff, N. et al. (eds.), Assessment of the System of Rice Intensification: Proceedings of an international conference, Sanya, April 1– 4, 2002. Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development, Ithaca, NY, pp 126–132. (http://ciifad.cornell.edu/sri/proc1/sri_29.pdf)Google Scholar
Thakur, A. K., Roy Chowdhury, S., Kundu, D. K. and Singh, R. (2004). Evaluation of crop establishment methods in irrigated rice. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 50: 631–640.Google Scholar
Thakur, A. K., Choudhari, S. K., Singh, R. and Kumar, A. (2009). Performance of rice varieties at different spacing grown by the system of rice intensification (SRI) in eastern India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79 (6):443–447.Google Scholar
Uphoff, N. (1999). Agroecological implications of the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Madagascar. Environment, Development and Sustainability 1: 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uphoff, N. (2003). Higher yields with fewer external inputs? The system of rice intensification and potential contributions to agricultural sustainability. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 1:38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uphoff, N., Fernandes, E. C. M., Yuan, L. P., Peng, J. M., Rafaralahy, S and Rabenandrasana, J. (eds.) (2002). Assessment of the System of Rice Intensification: Proceedings of an international conference, Sanya, April 1–4, 2004. Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development, Ithaca, NY. (http://ciifad.cornell.edu/sri/proc1/index.html)Google Scholar
Uphoff, N. and Randriamiharisoa, R. (2002). Reducing water use in irrigated rice production with the Madagascar System of Rice Intensification (SRI). In Bouman, B. A., Hengsdijk, H., Hardy, B., Bindraban, P. S., Thuong, T. P., and Ladha, J. K. (eds.), Water-Wise Rice Production, 71–87. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños.Google Scholar
Uphoff, N., Kassam, A. and Stoop, W. (2008). A critical assessment of a desk study comparing crop production systems: The example of the ‘system of rice intensification’ versus ‘best management practice’. Field Crops Research 108:109–114.Google Scholar
Wang, S. H., Cao, W. X., Jiang, D., Tai, T. B. and Zhu, Y. (2002). Physiological characteristics of high-yield techniques with SRI Rice. In: Uphoff, N. et al. (eds.), Assessment of the System of Rice Intensification: Proceedings of an international conference, Sanya, April 1– 4, 2002. Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development, Ithaca, NY, pp 116–124. (http://ciifad.cornell.edu/sri/proc1/sri_27.pdf)Google Scholar
Yoshida, S. (1981). Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
Yuan, L. P. (2002). A scientist's perspective on experience with SRI in China for raising the yields of super hybrid rice. In: Uphoff, N. et al. (eds.), Assessment of the System of Rice Intensification: Proceedings of an international conference, Sanya, April 1– 4, 2000. Cornell International Institute for Food Agriculture and Development, Ithaca, pp 23–25. (http://ciifad.cornell.edu/sri/proc1/sri_06.pdf)Google Scholar
Zhao, L., Wu, L., Li, Y. S., Lu, X. H., Zhu, D. F. and Uphoff, N. (2009). Influence of the system of rice intensification on rice yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency with different application rates. Experimental Agriculture 45:275–286.Google Scholar
Zhu, D. F., Chen, S. H., Zhang, Y. P. and Lin, X. Q. (2002). Tillering patterns and the contribution of tillers to grain yield with hybrid rice and wide spacing. In: Uphoff, N. et al. (eds.), Assessment of the System of Rice Intensification: Proceedings of an international conference, Sanya, April 1– 4, 2002. Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development, Ithaca, NY, pp 125–131. (http://ciifad.cornell.edu/sri/proc1/sri_28.pdf)Google Scholar