Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:33:08.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Agronomic Evaluation of Jackbean (Canavalia Ensiformis) in Yucatan, Mexico. I. Plant Density

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

C. D. J. Kessler
C. D. J. Kessler
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, AP 116-D Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico 97100 and School of Plant Biology, University College of North Wales, Deiniol Road,Bangor,Gwynedd LL57 2UW,Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Effects of plant density were studied in field experiments carried out over four successive years as part of an evaluation of the potential of jackbean and in order to determine appropriate cultural practices for the crop. Flowering, biomass accumulation, and seed yield and its components were examined. Increased plant density led to earlier canopy development and biomass accumulation, and to increased seed yield in long growing seasons. Maximum seed yield ranged from about 1.0 to 3.8 t ha−1 between years of short and of prolonged rainy seasons, respectively. Plant size and branching were reduced at high density. Variation in seed yield was associated with differences in pod number; single seed weight and number of seeds per pod remained more constant

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 11 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akinola, J. O. & Whiteman, P. C. (1975). Agronomic studies on pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) II. Responses to sowing density. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26:57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M. W., Coyne, D. P., Davis, J. H. C., Graham, P. H. & Francis, C. A. (1985). Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In Grain Legume Crops, 433–476 (Eds Summerfield, R. J. and Roberts, E. H.). London: Collins.Google Scholar
Anon (1984). La Milpa, Sistema Tradicional para Producir Maíz Asociado con Frijol Ib y Calabaza en la Península de Yucatán. Mérida, Yucatán, México: Centro de Investigaciones Agrícolas de la Península de Yucatán.Google Scholar
Doorenbos, J. & Pruitt, W. O. (1977). Crop Water Requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hedley, C. L. & Ambrose, M. J. (1981). Designing ‘leafless’ plants for improving yields of the dried pea crop. Advances in Agronomy 34:225–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, F. (1983). Efecto de densidad de población sobre el rendimiento de semilla de Canavalia ensiformis. Productión Animal Tropical 8:166–169.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. L. & Blackman, G. E. (1956). An analysis of the influence of plant density on the growth of Vicia faba I. The influence of density on the pattern of development. Journal of Experimental Botany 7:147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, C. D. J. (1987). Agronomic studies of the tropical legume Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC. (jack-bean) in Yucatan, Mexico. PhD thesis: University of Wales.Google Scholar
Kessler, C. D. J. (1990 a). An agronomic evaluation of jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis) in Yucatan, Mexico. II.Defoliation and time of sowing. Experimental Agriculture 26:23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, C. D.J. (1990 b). An agronomic evaluation of jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis) in Yucatan, Mexico. III.Germplasm. Experimental Agriculture 26:31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, D. R., Kretchmer, D. J., Zuluaga, S. & Jones, P. G. (1983). Physiological studies on yield and adaptation in Phaseolus vulgaris L. In Potential Productivity of Field Crops under Different Environments, 227–248 (Ed. Yoshida, S.). Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Muchow, R. C. & Charles-Edwards, D. A. (1982). An analysis of the growth of mung beans at a range of plant densities in tropical Australia. I. Dry matter production. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33:41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAS (National Academy of Sciences) (1979). Tropical Legumes: Resources for the Future. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
ShiblesR, M. R, M. & Weber, C. R. (1965). Leaf area, solar radiation interception and dry matter production by soybeans. Crop Science 5:575–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddique, K. H. M., Sedgley, R. H. & Marshall, C. (1984). Effect of plant density on growth and harvest index of branches in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Research 9:193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, W. M., Allen, D. J. & Summerfield, R. J. (1985). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). In Grain Legume Crops, 520–583 (Eds Summerfield, R. J. and Roberts, E. H.). London: Collins.Google Scholar
Stern, R. D., Dennett, M. D. & Dale, I. C. (1983). Analysing daily rainfall measurements to give agro-nomically useful results. I. Direct methods. Experimental Agriculture 18:223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Wien, H. C. (1980). Effects of photoperiod and air temperature on growth and yield of economic legumes. In Advances in Legume Science, 17–36 (Eds Summerfield, R. J. and Bunting, A. H.). London: HMSO.Google Scholar