Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:27:29.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Agronomic Efficiency of the N.I.A.E. Mechanized Tied Ridge System of Cultivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

M. Dagg  and
J. C. Macartney
M. Dagg
Affiliation:
East African Agriculture. & Forestry Research Organization, Muguga, Kenya
J. C. Macartney
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Tanzania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A tied ridge system of hand cultivation has been practised successfully in parts of Tanzania for many years. Equipment to mechanize this system was devised and constructed by the National Institute for Agricultural Engineering, U.K., particularly for use in areas of marginal rainfall where water conservation is essential. Agronomic trials with this equipment were carried out on three soil types in Northern Tanzania. Records from resistance units showed much better penetration of rainfall under tied ridges than under flat cultivation. Corresponding yield responses in maize were only obtained when the increase in available water made an appreciable difference to conditions of water stress at the time of tasselling and silking. Weeding operations using a ridging body achieved a satisfactory control. After a few modifications to the equipment, especially the incorporation of a small tine to rip the bottom of the basins to improve infiltration, the system of cultivation based on ripping, ridging and tieing proved to be an adequate alternative to ploughing and harrowing for seed bed preparation, and a much more efficient method of water conservation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 279 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bouyoucos, G. J. & Mick, A. H. (1940). Mich. Agr. Expt. Stat. Tech. Bull. 172.Google Scholar
Cashmore, W. H. & Hawkins, J. C. (1957). J. Instn. Brit. Agric. Engrs. 13, 3.Google Scholar
Dagg, M. & Hosegood, P. H. (1962). E. Afr. agric. for. J. 27, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagg, M. & Wangati, F. J. (1964). 2nd Symp. E. Afr. Acad.(Cyclo. EAAFRO).Google Scholar
Duley, F. L. (1939). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 4, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, W. D. (1952). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 20, 81.Google Scholar
Faulkner, O. T. (1944.). Trop. Agric. 21, 177.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. C. (1959). Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 36, 35.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Sir Joseph, Prentice, A. N., Farbrother, H. G., Lea, J. D. & Stephens, A. L. (1959). Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 36, 81.Google Scholar
Lawes, D. A. (1957). Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 34, 155.Google Scholar
Lawes, D. A. (1961). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 29, 307.Google Scholar
Peat, J. E. & Prentice, A. N. (1949). E. Afr. agric. J. 15, 48.Google Scholar
Pereira, H. C. & Beckley, V. R. S. (1953). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 21, 1.Google Scholar
Pereira, H. C., Hosegood, P. H. & Dagg, M. (1967). Expl Agric., 3, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, H. C., Wood, R. A.Brzostowski, H. W. & Hosegood, P. H. (1958). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 26, 213.Google Scholar
Prerrrice, A. N. (1946). E. Afr. agric. J., 12, 101.Google Scholar
Rounce, N. V. (1949). The Agriculture of the Cultivation Steppe of the Lake, Western and Central Provinces. Capetown: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Scott, R. M. (1957). A Reconnaissance Survey of Lo joro Region Tanganyika. Cyclostyled Report, E.A.A.F.R.O.Google Scholar
Walton, P. D. (1962). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 30, 63.Google Scholar