Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:15:55.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SITE-SPECIFIC NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR MAIZE HYBRIDS IN AN INCEPTISOL OF WEST BENGAL, INDIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

KRISHNENDU RAY ,
HIRAK BANERJEE ,
KALLOL BHATTACHARYYA ,
SUDARSHAN DUTTA ,
AMIT PHONGLOSA ,
ARNAB PARI  and
SUKAMAL SARKAR
KRISHNENDU RAY*
Affiliation:
Sasya Shyamala Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University, Narendrapur 700103, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
HIRAK BANERJEE
Affiliation:
Regional Research Station, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kakdwip 743347, South 24-Parganas, West Bengal, India
KALLOL BHATTACHARYYA
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India
SUDARSHAN DUTTA
Affiliation:
International Plant Nutrition Institute, South Asia Program, 36 Gorakshabasi Road 700028, Kolkata, India
AMIT PHONGLOSA
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Regional Research and Technology Transfer Substation, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Umerkote 764073, Nabarangpur, Odisha, India
ARNAB PARI
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India
SUKAMAL SARKAR
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India
*
§§Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The area under hybrid maize cultivation is increasing rapidly across South Asia. However, information regarding the proper nutrient management for modern stay-green maize hybrids in India is not adequate resulting in low productivity. Existing nutrient management practices are not able to capture the momentum change in the scenario of soil nutrient supply capacity and plant nutrient demand for achieving higher yield target. The present study aims at establishing the site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) package for an inceptisol (West Bengal, India). Soil indigenous nutrient supply capacity and nutrient use efficiency was also evaluated by using the nutrient omission plot technique. The experiment was laid out in strip-plot design, assigning three maize hybrids (P 3522, P 3396 and Rajkumar) in the vertical strip and nine fertilizer treatments [50% RDF/Recommended dose of fertilizer, 75% RDF, 100% RDF (200-60-60 kg N-P2O5-K2O ha−1), 125% RDF, 150% RDF, 100% PK, 100% NK, 100% NP and control (zero-NPK)] in the horizontal strip, with three replications. Results of the experiment revealed that the differences among cultivars were generally non-significant. The maize hybrids showed greater yield response to fertilization with N (4.14 Mg ha−1) during winter, followed by K (2.54 Mg ha−1) and P (1.58 Mg ha−1). Indigenous nutrient supply was estimated 107.2, 37.6 and 107.7 kg ha−1 for N, P and K, respectively. Both average agronomic efficiency (AE) and recovery efficiency (RE) were increased with 50% RDF and it decreased with further increase in NPK levels up to 150% RDF. The average internal efficiency (IE) was higher with 50% RDF closely followed by the treatment with absence of N. As grain yields and gross return over fertilizer (GRF) under 75 to 150% NPK treatments were similar, nutrient doses of 150 kg N, 45 kg P2O5 and 45 kg K2O ha−1 were recommended as optimum for maize hybrids.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 54 , Issue 6 , December 2018 , pp. 874 - 887
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akmal, Y. M. P. and SariGirsang, S. (2008). Accelerating adoption of suitable cultural practices of maize to minimize the yield gap and increase farmers in Karo, North Sumatra. In Proceedings of 10th Asian Regional Maize Workshop, Makassar, Indonesia, pp. 484–488.Google Scholar
AOAC. (1995). Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edn. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Attanandana, T. and Yost, R. S. (2003). A site-specific nutrient management approach for maize. Better Crops International 17:3–7.Google Scholar
Aulakh, M. S. and Malhi, S. S. (2004). Fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency as influenced by interactions of N with other nutrients. In Agriculture and the Nitrogen Cycle: Assessing the Impacts of Fertilizer use on Food Production and the Environment, 181–193 (Eds. Mosier, A., Syers, J. K., and Freney, J. R.). Covelo, CA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, H., Goswami, R., Chakraborty, S., Dutta, S., Majumdar, K., Satyanarayana, T., Jat, M. L. and Zingore, S. (2014). Understanding biophysical and socio-economic determinants of maize (Zea mays L.) yield variability in eastern India. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 70–71:79–93.Google Scholar
BARC. (2005). Fertilizer Recommendation Guide-2005. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Dobermann, A. and Cassman, K. G. (2005). Cereal area and nitrogen use efficiency are drivers of future nitrogen fertilizer consumption. Science China Life Sciences 48:745–758.Google Scholar
Dobermann, A., Witt, C., Abdulrachman, S., Gines, H. C., Nagarajan, R., Son, T. T., Tan, P. S., Wang, G. H., Chien, N. V., Thoa, V. T. K., Phung, C. V., Stalin, P., Muthukrishnan, P., Ravi, V., Babu, M., Simbahan, G. C. and Adviento, M. A. (2003). Soil fertility and indigenous nutrient supply in irrigated rice domains of Asia. Agronomy Journal 95:913–923.Google Scholar
Fageria, V. D. (2001). Nutrient interactions in crop plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 24:1269–1290.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT. (2015). Statistical databases and data-sets of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at URL: http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor (Accessed on 28th April, 2015].Google Scholar
Ghosh, B. N., Singh, R. J. and Mishra, P. K. (2015). Soil and input management options for increasing nutrient use efficiency. In Nutrient use Efficiency: from Basics to Advances, 17–27 (Eds Rakshit, A., Singh, H. B., and Sen, A.). Springer, India.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis, 38–56. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
Kaledhonkar, P. R., Raskar, S. K., Sontakke, P. L. and Jagtap, G. P. (2011). Response of quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars to nitrogen levels. Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences 3:49–51.Google Scholar
Khurana, H. S., Phillips, S. B., Singh, B., Alley, M. M., Dobermann, A., Sidhu, A. S., Singh, Y. and Peng, S. (2008). Agronomic and economic evaluation of site-specific nutrient management for irrigated wheat in northwest India. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 82:15–31.Google Scholar
Ladha, J. K., Tirol-Padre, A., Reddy, C. K., Cassman, K. G., Verma, S., Powlson, D. S., van Kessel, C., Richter, D. B., Chakraborty, D. and Pathak, H. (2016). Global nitrogen budgets in cereals: A 50-year assessment for maize, rice, and wheat production systems. Scientific Reports 6:19355; 10.1038/srep19355Google Scholar
Liu, X., He, P., Jin, J., Zhou, W., Sulewski, G. and Phillips, S. (2011). Yield gaps, indigenous nutrient supply, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat in China. Agronomy Journal 103:1452–1463.Google Scholar
Mengel, K. and Kirkby, E. A. (2006). Principles of Plant Nutrition, 5th edn. India: Springer (India) Private limited.Google Scholar
Pasuquin, J. M., Witt, C. and Pampolino, M. (2010). A new site-specific nutrient management approach for maize in the favorable tropical environments of Southeast Asia. In 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, 1–6 August, 2010, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
Pathak, H., Singh, Y. and Singh, B. (2003). Site-specific nutrient management for improving the productivity of rice-wheat cropping system. In Nutrient Management for Sustainable Rice-wheat Cropping System, 79–98 (Eds Singh, Y., Singh, B., Nayyar, V. K., and Singh, J.). New Delhi, India: National Agricultural Technology Project, Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Shanti, K., Rao, V. P., Reddy, M. R., Reddy, M. S. and Sarma, P. S. (1997). Response of maize (Zea mays) hybrid and composite to different levels of nitrogen. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 67 (9):424–425.Google Scholar
Shiferaw, B., Prasanna, B. M., Hellin, J. and Banziger, M. (2011). Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and futurechallenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Security 3:307–327.Google Scholar
Timsina, J., Jat, M. L. and Majumdar, K. (2010). Rice-maize systems in South Asia: Current status, future prospects and research priorities for nutrient management. Plant and Soil 335:65–82.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. R., Grunes, D. L. and Sumner, M. E. (1999). Nutrient interactions in soil and plant nutrition. In Handbook of Soil Science, 89–112 (Ed Sumner, M. E.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Witt, C. and Dobermann, A. (2002). A site-specific nutrient management approach for irrigated, lowland rice in Asia. Better Crops with Plant Food 16:20–24.Google Scholar
Xu, X., He, P., Pampolino, M. F., Johnston, A. M., Qiu, S., Zhao, S., Chuan, L. and Zhou, W. (2014). Fertilizer recommendation for maize in China based on yield response and agronomic efficiency. Field Crop Research 157:27–34.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ray et al supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Ray et al supplementary material(File)
File 17.3 KB