Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:57:48.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Setting up and Managing an Experimental Farm for Crop Studies: the First 20 Years' Experience at Broom's Barn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

D. A. Cooke ,
K. W. Jaggard ,
A. P. Draycott ,
R. K. Scott ,
D. J. Webb  and
M. J. Golding
D. A. Cooke
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
K. W. Jaggard
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
R. K. Scott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
D. J. Webb
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
M. J. Golding
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The objectives and management policy of an experimental farm for studies on the sugar beet crop are described. Farm yields of sugar beet and cereals are discussed in relation to yields in experiments and on a national scale. Some aspects of experimental accuracy and design are considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 1982 , pp. 105 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1972). Met.O.856C. Tables of temperature, relative humidity, precipitation and sunshine for the world. III. Europe and the Azores. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Baker, A. N. & Dunning, R. A. (1975). Some effects of soil type and crop density on the activity and abundance of the epigeic fauna, particularly the Carabidae, in sugar beet fields. Journal of Applied Ecology 12:809–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biscoe, P. V., Draycott, A. P., Glauert, A. W., Jaggard, K. W., Last, P. J., Messem, A. B., Scott, R. K., Booth, K. M. R., Harris, C. C., Webb, D. J. & Milford, G. F. J. (1980). Environmental and nutritional aspects of crop growth and productivity. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1979 1:59–61.Google Scholar
Byford, W. J. (1981). Experiments with sulphur and other fungicides to control sugar-beet powdery mildew in England 1977–80. Proc. 1981 British Crop Protection Conference – Pests and Diseases, 529–534.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1950). Experimental Designs. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J., Hull, R. & Messem, A. B. (1977). Changes in Broom's Barn farm soils, 1960–75. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1976 1:33–52.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Last, P. J. (1971). Effects of cultural practices and fertilisers on sugar beet quality. IIRB (Journal of the International Institute for Sugar Beet Research) 5:169–185.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Webb, D. J. (1972). Long term effects of fertilisers at Broom's Barn, 1965–70. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1971 2:155–164.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Webb, D. J. (1978). Long term effects of fertilisers at Broom's Barn, 1971–76. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1977 2:15–30.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Farley, R. F. (1971). Effect of sodium and magnesium fertilisers and irrigation on growth, composition and yield of sugar beet. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22:559–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draycott, A. P., Hull, R., Messem, A. B. & Webb, D. J. (1970). Effects of soil compaction on yield and fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science 75:533–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Last, P. J. & Messem, A. B. (1981). Nitrogen and irrigation. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1980 1:72.Google Scholar
Dunning, R. A. & Davis, N. B. (1975). Sugar beet, and its pest and virus problems, in England. Proceedings 8th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference 453–463.Google Scholar
Hornsey, K. G. & Arnold, M. H. (1979). The origins of weed beet. Annals of Applied Biology 92:279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, R. & Webb, D. J. (1967). The effect of subsoiling and different levels of manuring on yields of cereals, lucerne and sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science 69:183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, K. W. (1975). The size and shape of plots in sugar-beet experiments. Annals of Applied Biology 80:351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, K. W. (1977). Effects of soil density on yield and fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. Annals of Applied Biology 86:301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maughan, G. L. (1974). Too many beet left in our fields. British Sugar Beet Review 42 (3):158–163.Google Scholar
Milford, G. F. J. & Riley, J. (1980). Sugar beet. Temperature and leaf development. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1979 1:46–47.Google Scholar
Owers, A. C. & Clare, R. W. (1975). Problems of seedbed preparation. British Sugar Beet Review 42 (4): 9–11.Google Scholar
Thornhill, W. A. & Dunning, R. A. (1980). Plant establishment. Insecticide/herbicide/rotation interactions. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1979 1:58–59.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. & Watson, M. A. (1953). Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. III. The effect of infection with beet yellows and beet mosaic viruses on the growth and yield of the sugar beet root crop. Annals of Applied Biology 40:1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar