Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T04:51:06.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESPONSES OF WHEAT PLANTS UNDER POST-ANTHESIS STRESS INDUCED BY DEFOLIATION: I. CONTRIBUTION OF AGRO-PHYSIOLOGICAL TRAITS TO GRAIN YIELD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2015

DEJAN DODIG ,
JASNA SAVIĆ ,
VESNA KANDIĆ ,
MIROSLAV ZORIĆ ,
BILJANA VUCELIĆ RADOVIĆ ,
ALEKSANDRA POPOVIĆ  and
STEVE QUARRIE
DEJAN DODIG*
Affiliation:
Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje, 1 Slobodana Bajića Street, 11185 Zemun-Belgrade, Serbia
JASNA SAVIĆ
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 6 Nemanjina Street, 11080 Zemun-Belgrade, Serbia
VESNA KANDIĆ
Affiliation:
Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje, 1 Slobodana Bajića Street, 11185 Zemun-Belgrade, Serbia
MIROSLAV ZORIĆ
Affiliation:
Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, 30 Maksima Gorkog Street, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
BILJANA VUCELIĆ RADOVIĆ
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 6 Nemanjina Street, 11080 Zemun-Belgrade, Serbia
ALEKSANDRA POPOVIĆ
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
STEVE QUARRIE
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

When water stress develops post-anthesis, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants have to rely increasingly on remobilization of previously stored assimilates to maintain grain filling. In two-year field trials, we studied more than 20 agronomic and developmental traits in 61 wheat genotypes (27 F4:5 families, 17 parents used for the crosses and 17 standards), comparing plants that were defoliated (DP) by cutting off all leaf blades 10 days after anthesis with intact control plants (CP). Estimated contributions of stem and sheath assimilate reserves to grain weight/spike were from 10–54% and from 24–84% in CP and DP plants, respectively. Stem-related traits were among key traits determining stem reserve contribution (SRC). The most important genetic variables in differentiating genotypes for stress tolerance were biomass/stem, stem reserves mobilization efficiency and grain filling rate (GFR). Balance among traits related to yield maintenance in DP were more important than their high values. In general F4:5 families (FAM), that had been crossed to combine typical breeding traits such as biomass and yield components, showed better tolerance under moderate stress than standards and parents.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 203 - 223
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbad, H., El Jaafari, S. A., Bort, J. and Araus, J. L. (2004). Comparative relationship of the flag leaf and the ear photosynthesis with the biomass and grain yield of durum wheat under a range of water conditions and different genotypes. Agronomie 24:19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvaro, F., Isidro, J., Villegas, D., García del Moral, L. F. and Royo, C. (2008). Breeding effects on grain filling, biomass partitioning, and remobilization in Mediterranean durum wheat. Agronomy Journal 100:361–370.Google Scholar
Álvaro, F., Royo, C., Garcia del Moral, L. F. and Villegas, D. (2007). Grain filling and dry matter translocation responses to source–sink modifications in a historical series of durum wheat. Crop Science 48:1523–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzalini, A. and Cox, D. R. (1984). Two new tests associated with analysis of variance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 46:335–343.Google Scholar
Blum, A. (1983). Genetic and physiological relationship in plant breeding for drought resistance. Agricultural Water management 7:195–205.Google Scholar
Blum, A. (1998). Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilisation. Euphytica 100:77–83.Google Scholar
Blum, A., Mayer, J. and Golan, G. (1983). Chemical desiccation of wheat plants as a simulator of post-anthesis stress, II. Relations to drought stress. Field Crops Research 6:149–155.Google Scholar
Blum, A., Sinmena, B., Mayer, J., Golan, G. and Shpiler, L. (1994). Stem reserve mobilization supports wheat-grain filling under heat stress. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 21:771–781.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., Kobiljski, B. and Kraljevic Balalic, M. (2006). Grain filling parameters and yield components in wheat. Genetika 38:175–181.Google Scholar
Calderini, D., Savin, R., Abeledo, L., Reynolds, M. and Slafer, G. (2001). The importance of the period immediately preceding anthesis for grain weight determination in wheat. Euphytica 119:199–204.Google Scholar
Calderini, D. F. and Reynolds, M. P. (2000). Changes in grain weight as a consequence of degraining treatments at pre and post anthesis in synthetic hexaploid lines of wheat (Ttiticumdurum x T. tauschii). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27:183–191.Google Scholar
Cruz-Aguado, J. A., Rodés, R., Pérez, I. P. and Dorado, M. (2000). Morphological characteristics and yield components associated with accumulation and loss of dry matter in internodes of wheat. Field Crops Research 66:129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodig, D., Barnes, J., Kobiljski, B. and Quarrie, S. (2011). Traits associated with relocation of resources during grain filling in defoliated bread wheat varieties: Phenotypic and genetic analyses. In Book of Abstracts of the Annual Main Meeting of the Society for Experimental Biology, 193. Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
Dodig, D., Zoric, M., Knezevic, D., King, S. R. and Surlan-Momirovic, G. (2008). Genotype ×environment interaction for wheat yield in different drought stress conditions and agronomic traits suitable for selection. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59:536–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döll, P. and Flörke, M. (2005). Global-scale estimation of diffuse groundwater recharge. Frankfurt Hydrology Paper 03. Institute of Physical Geography, Frankfurt University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.Google Scholar
Dreccer, M. F., Van Herwaarden, A. F. and Chapman, S. C. (2009). Grain number and grain weight in wheat lines contrasting for stem water soluble carbohydrate concentration. Field Crops Research 112:43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubrovsky, M., Svoboda, M. D., Trnka, M., Hayes, M. J., Wilhite, D. A., Zalud, Z. and Hlavinka, P. (2008). Application of relative drought indices in assessing climate-change impacts on drought conditions in Czechia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 96:155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehdaie, B., Alloush, G. A., Madore, M. A. and Waines, J. G. (2006a). Genotypic variation for stem reserves and mobilization in wheat. I. Post anthesis changes in internode dry matter. Crop Science 46:735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehdaie, B., Alloush, G. A., Madore, M. A. and Waines, J. G. (2006b). Genotypic variation for stem reserves and mobilization in wheat. II Postanthesis changes in internode water-soluble carbohydrates. Crop Science 46:2093–2103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehdaie, B., Alloush, G. A. and Waines, J. G. (2008). Genotypic variation in linear rate of grain growth and contribution of stem reserves to grain yield in wheat. Field Crops Research 106:34–43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, G. C. J. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, 257–270. Shanhua, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. and Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29:897–912.Google Scholar
Friedman, J., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. The Journal of Statistical Software 33:1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebbing, T. (2003). The enclosed and exposed part of the peduncle of wheat (Triticum aestivum) – spatial separation of fructan storage. New Phytologist 159:245–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, A. K., Kaur, K. and Kaur, N. (2011). Stem reserve mobilization and sink activity in wheat under drought conditions. American Journal of Plant Sciences 2:70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallauer, A. R., Carena, M. J. and Miranda Filho, J. B. (2010). Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Hunt, L., Van Der Poorten, G. and Pararajasingham, S. (1991). Postanthesis temperature effects on duration and rate of grain filling in some winter and spring wheats. The Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71:609–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joudi, M., Ahmadi, A., Mohamadi, V., Abbasi, A., Vergauwen, R., Mohamadi, H. and Van den Ende, W. (2012). Comparison of fructan dynamics in two wheat cultivars with different capacities of accumulation and remobilization under drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum 144:1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karim, M., Hamid, A. and Rahman, S. (2000). Grain growth and yield performance of wheat under subtropical conditions: II. Effect of water stress at reproductive stage. Cereal Research Communications 28:101–107.Google Scholar
Kroonenberg, P. M. (1995). Introduction to biplots for G × E tables. Department of Mathematics, Research Report 51. University of Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Sahrawi, A. K., Ramos, C., Amaranth, S. T., Ismail, A. M. and Wade, E. L. K. (2006). Partitioning of dry matter during drought stress in rained lowland rice. Field Crops Research 98:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Cain, J., Jiang, D., Liu, F., Dai, T. and Cao, W. (2013). Carbohydrates accumulation and remobilization in wheat plants as influenced by combined water logging and shading stress during grain filling. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 199:37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez Castaneda, C. and Richards, R. A. (1994). Variation in temperate cereals in rained environments. II. Pasic development and growth. Field Crops Research 37:63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgounov, A., Huan, S., Lang, L., Martynov, S. and Sonder, K. (2013). Climate change at winter wheat breeding sites in central Asia, eastern Europe, and USA, and implication for breeding. Euphytica 194:277–292.Google Scholar
Motzo, R., Giunta, M. and Deidda, F. (1996). Relationships between grain filling parameters, fertility, earliness and grain protein of durum wheat in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 47:129–142.Google Scholar
Prasad, P. V. V., Pisipati, S. R., Momcilovic, I. and Ristic, Z. (2011). Independent and combined effects of high temperature and drought stress during grain filling on plant yield and chloroplast EF-Tu expression in spring wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197:430–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarrie, S. A., Dodig, D., Kobiljski, B., Kandić, V., Savić, J., Rančić, D. and Pekić Quarrie, S. (2011). Improving wheat yields using association mapping. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium of Agriculture ‘Agrosym Jahorina 2011’, 2–8. Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 10–12 November 2011.Google Scholar
Quarrie, S. A., Stojanović, J. and Pekić, S. (1999). Improving drought resistance in small grained cereals: A case study, progress and prospects. Plant Growth Regulation 29:1–21.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Regan, K. L., Whan, B. R. and Turner, N. C. (1993). Evaluation of chemical desiccation as a selection technique for drought resistance in a dry land wheat breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44:1683–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, M. P., Dreccer, F. and Trethowan, R. (2007). Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces. The Journal of Experimental Botany 58:177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruuska, S. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Van Herwaarden, A. F., Richards, R. A., Fettell, N. A., Tabe, L. and Jenkins, C. L. D. (2006). Genotypic variation in water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 33:799–809.Google Scholar
Sanjari Pireivatlou, A. G., Aliyev, R. T. and Sorkhi Lalehloo, B. (2011.) Grain filling rate and duration in bread wheat under irrigated and drought stressed conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology & Breeding 1:69–85.Google Scholar
Santiveri, F., Royo, C. and Romagosa, I. (2002). Patterns of grain filling of spring and winter hexaploid triticales. The European Journal of Agronomy 16:219–230.Google Scholar
Scofield, G. N., Ruuska, S. A., Aoki, N., Lewis, D. C., Tabe, L. M. and Jenkins, C. L. D. (2009). Starch storage in the stems of wheat plants: Localization and temporal changes. Annals of Botany 103:859–868.Google Scholar
Sio-Se Mardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K. and Mohammadi, V. (2006). Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research 98:222–229.Google Scholar
Slafer, G. A. and Araus, J. L. (1998). Improving wheat responses to abiotic stresses. In Proceedings of the 9th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, 201–213. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.Google Scholar
Thaler, S., Eitzinger, J., Trnka, M. and Dubrovsky, M. (2012). Impacts of climate change and alternative adaptation options on winter wheat yield and water productivity in a dry climate in Central Europe. The Journal of Agricultural Science 150:537–555.Google Scholar
Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 58:267–288.Google Scholar
Trnka, M. et al. (2011). A. Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change. Global Change Biology 17:2298–2318.Google Scholar
Van Herwaarden, A. F. and Richards, R. A. (2002). Water soluble carbohydrate accumulation in the stems is related to breeding progress in Australian wheats. In Plant breeding for the 11th millennium: Proceedings of the 12th Plant Breeding Conference, 878–882. Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
Weldearegay, D. F., Yan, F., Jiang, D. and Liu, F. (2012). Independent and combined effects of soil warming and drought stress during anthesis on seed set and grain yield in two spring wheat varieties. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 198:245–253.Google Scholar
Willenbrink, J., Bonnett, G. D., Willenbrink, S. and Wardlaw, I. F. (1998). Changes of enzyme activities associated with the mobilization of carbohydrate reserves (fructans) from the stem of wheat during kernel filling. New Phytologist 139:471–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, W. and Kang, M. S. (2003). GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, J., Zhu, Q. Z. and Liu, L. (2001a). Water deficit induced senescence and its relationship to the remobilization of pre stored carbon in wheat during grain filling. Agronomy Journal 93:196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Zhu, Q. and Wang, W. (2001b). Hormonal changes in the grains of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Plant Physiology 127:315–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical Analysis, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Sui, X., Li, B., Su, B., Li, J. and Zhou, D. (1998). An improved water-use efficiency for winter wheat grown under reduced irrigation. Field Crops Research 59:91–98.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Dodig supplementary material

Table S1-S4

Download Dodig supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.3 MB