Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T20:42:26.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Tea (Camellia sinensis) to Irrigation and Fertilizer. I. Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

William Stephens  and
M. K. V. Carr
William Stephens
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Water Management, Silsoe College, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4DT, England
M. K. V. Carr
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Water Management, Silsoe College, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4DT, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The yield responses of clonal tea (Clone 6/8) to irrigation and fertilizer were studied in a field experiment (based on the line-source technique) at a high altitude site (1840 m) in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania over a three-year period. In this area (latitude 8°33′S) the annual dry season can last up to six months with potential soil water deficits reaching 600 to 700 mm. In the third year of the experiments yields for the fully irrigated, well fertilized (375 kg N ha−1) treatments had reached 4.9 t ha−1 of made tea. These were reduced by about 2.9 kg ha−1 for each mm increase in the potential soil water deficit. For tea with little or no fertilizer applied the loss of yield was about 1.4 kg ha−1 mm−1. These figures provide a basis for assessing the potential benefits from irrigation where other factors, such as large saturation deficits of the air, do not restrict shoot extension and yield. Yield responses to nitrogen (applied as N:P:K 20:10:10) were essentially linear up to a maximum of about 375 kg N ha−1 in the fully irrigated plots, and 300 kg N ha−1 for the unirrigated plots. Irrigation increased the proportion of crop harvested during the dry season, up to 45% in the fully irrigated treatments. The commercial implications of these results for ‘high’ and ‘low’ input producers are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 177 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carr, M. K. V. (1974). Irrigating seedling tea in Southern Tanzania: effects on total yields, distribution of yield and water use. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83:363–378.Google Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (1977). Changes in the water status of tea clones during dry weather in Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89:297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V., Dale, M. O. & Stephens, William (1987). Yield distribution in irrigated tea (Camellia sinensis) at two sites in Eastern Africa. Experimental Agriculture 23:75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V., Stephens, William & Congdon, T. C. E. (1988). Tea in Tanzania. Outlook on Agriculture 17:18–22.Google Scholar
Clowes, M. StJ. & Starch, P. (1988). Sayama irrigation trial. Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa Quarterly Newsletter 92:6–10.Google Scholar
Dale, M. O. (1971). Progress with tea irrigation experiments in Malawi. In Water and the Tea Plant, 59–78 (Eds Carr, M. K. V. and Susan, Carr). Kericho: Tea Research Institute of East Africa.Google Scholar
Doorenbos, J. (1976). Agro-meteorologicalfeldstations. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 27. Rome:FAO.Google Scholar
Grice, W. J., Clowes, M. StJ., Malenga, N. E. A. & Mkwaila, B. (1988). Update on fertilizer and foliar nutrient recommendations for tea grown in Malawi. Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa Quarterly Newsletter 89:5–9.Google Scholar
Hanks, R. J., Keller, J., Ramussen, V. P. & Wilson, G. D. (1976). Line source sprinkler for continuously variable irrigation–crop production studies. Soil Science Society America Journal 44:426–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, J. S. G. (1965). Tables for the rapid computation of the Penman estimate of evaporation. East African Agricultural and Foresty Journal 30:286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mkwaila, B. & Grice, W. J. (1988). Review of results from the Bloomfield irrigation trial on mature tea. Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa Quarterly Newsletter 92:4–6.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. D. V. & Carr, M. K. V. (1988). Analysing line source irrigation experiments. Experimental Agriculture 24:169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Othieno, C. O. (1978). Supplementary irrigation of young clonal tea in Kenya. I. Survival, growth and yield. Experimental Agriculture 14:229–238.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series (A) 193:120–145.Google Scholar
Squire, G. R. & Callander, B. A. (1981). Tea plantations. In Water Deficits and Plant Growth, 6:471–510 (Ed. Kozlowski, T. T.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, William & Carr, M. K. V. (1989). A water stress index for tea (Camellia sinensis). Experimental Agriculture 25:545–558.Google Scholar
Stephens, William & Carr, M. K. V. (1990). Seasonal and clonal differences in shoot extension rates and numbers in tea (Camellia sinensis). Experimental Agriculture 26:83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, William, Hamer, P. J. C. & Carr, M. K. V. (1988). The Yield Response of Tea to Irrigation and Fertilizer. Second Annual Report to ODA: 1986–87. Silsoe: Silsoe College.Google Scholar
Tanton, T. W. (1982). Environmental factors affecting the yield of tea (Camellia sinensis). I. Effects of air temperature. Experimental Agriculture 18:47–52.Google Scholar
Tea Research Foundation of Kenya (1986). Tea Growers Handbook (4th edn.). Kericho: Tea Research Foundation of Kenya.Google Scholar