Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:19:21.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY OF THE TRANSGENIC COTTON–WHEAT PRODUCTION SYSTEM THROUGH PEANUT INTERCROPPING AND FYM ADDITION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2013

RAMAN JEET SINGH ,
I. P. S. AHLAWAT  and
KULDEEP KUMAR
RAMAN JEET SINGH*
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi 110 012, India
I. P. S. AHLAWAT
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi 110 012, India
KULDEEP KUMAR
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi 110 012, India
*
†Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]; Present address: Scientist, CSWCRTI, Dehradun 248 195, Uttarakhand, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The cotton–wheat production system (CWPS) occupies an important place in the agricultural economy of several South Asian countries. The instability of the CWPS has increased particularly during the post-transgenic hybrids phase mainly because of these hybrids calling for intensive crop management being cultivated under all situations, especially in resource-poor conditions leading to violent fluctuations during adverse years and thereby affecting the socio-economic status of these developing countries. A study was conducted to evaluate and quantify the effect of the two-tier intercropping of cotton and peanut with the substitution of a 25–50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) of cotton by farmyard manure (FYM) on productivity, profitability and nitrogen economy in the CWPS at New Delhi during 2006–08. To quantify the residual effects of previous crops and their fertility levels, a succeeding crop of wheat was grown with varying rates of nitrogen, viz. 0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha−1. Wheat equivalent productivity was significantly more with the inclusion of peanut in the CWPS (21–26%) with a high net return (US$288) than a pure stand of cotton in the CWPS. The substitution of 25% RDN of cotton by FYM being on par with no substitution recorded a higher wheat equivalent yield, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake, net return and nitrogen use efficiencies. Nitrogen economy in wheat was 22 kg ha−1 due to inclusion of peanut in the CWPS and 13 kg ha−1 due to substitution of the 25% RDN of cotton by FYM. The study suggested that for the success of the CWPS in South Asian countries, escalating prices of N fertilizers with environmental issues and the instability of transgenic hybrids can be overcome by using wider rows of cotton by peanut intercrop with the integrated use of both organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 321 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Prakash, A. H., Sankranarayanan, K., Dharajothi, B. and Gopalkrishnan, N. (2009). Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on soil water dynamics, productivity and input use efficiency of Bt cotton in a Vertic Ustropept. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79 (6):448–453.Google Scholar
Behera, U. K., Sharma, A. R. and Pandey, H. N. (2007). Sustaining productivity of wheat–soybean cropping system through integrated nutrient management practices on the Vertisols of central India. Plant and Soil 297 (1–2):185–199.Google Scholar
Blaise, D., Bonde, A. N. and Chaudhary, R. S. (2005). Nutrient uptake and balance of cotton + pigeonpea strip intercropping on rainfed Vertisols of central India. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem 73 (2–3):135–145.Google Scholar
Bouquet, D. J. and Breitenbeck, G. A. (2000). Nitrogen rate effect on partitioning and dry matter of cotton. Crop Science 40:1685–1693.Google Scholar
CICR. (2010). Vision 2025. Nagpur, Maharashtra, India: Central Institute of Cotton Research.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn.New York: John Willey.Google Scholar
Das, A., Prasad, M., Gautam, R. C. and Shivay, Y. S. (2006). Productivity of cotton as influenced by organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 76 (6):354–357.Google Scholar
Fritschi, F. B., Roberts, B. A., Rains, D. W., Travis, R. L. and Hutmacher, R. B. (2004). Fate of nitrogen-15 applied to irrigated Acala and Pima cotton. Agronomy Journal 96:646–655.Google Scholar
Ghosh, P. K., Bandypadhyay, K. K., Wanjari, R. H., Manna, M. C., Mishra, A. K. and Mohanty, M. (2007). Legume effect for enhancing productivity and nutrient use efficiency in major cropping systems – an Indian perspective: a review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 30 (1):61–86.Google Scholar
ICAR. (2010). Agricultural Research Data Book. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
ISAAA. (2008). International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Available at: http://www.isaaa.org.Google Scholar
Isafan, D. (1990). Nitrogen physiological efficiency index in some selected spring barley cultivars. Journal of Plant Nutrition 13:1970–2014.Google Scholar
Kairon, M. S., Singh, R. P., Gupta, S. C. and Mundra, M. C. (1996). Production potential of cotton–wheat cropping system. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 10 (1):118–122.Google Scholar
Karlen, D. L., Kramer, L. A. and Logsdon, S. D. (1998). Field-scale nitrogen balance associated with long-term continuous corn production. Agronomy Journal 90:644–650.Google Scholar
Khola, O. P. S., Dube, R. K. and Sharma, N. K. (1999). Conservation and production ability of maize (Zea mays) – legume intercropping systems under varying dates of sowing. Indian Journal of Agronomy 44 (1):40–46.Google Scholar
Lupwayi, N. Z. and Kennedy, A. C. (2007). Grain legumes in northern plains: impacts on selected biological processes. Agronomy Journal 99:1700–1709.Google Scholar
Maitra, S., Ghosh, D. C., Sounda, G., Jana, P. K. and Roy, D. K. (2000). Productivity, competition and economics of intercropping legumes in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) at different fertility levels. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 70 (12):824–828.Google Scholar
Mathur, G. M. (1997). Effect of long term application of fertilizer and manures on soil properties and yield under cotton–wheat rotation in north-west Rajasthan. Journal of Indian Society of soil Science 45 (2):288–292.Google Scholar
Mayee, C. D., Monga, D., Dhillon, S. S., Nehra, P. L. and Pundhir, P. (2008). Cotton–Wheat Production System in South Asia: A Success Story. Bangkok, Thailand: Asia Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions.Google Scholar
Mayee, C. D., Singh, P., Dongre, A. B., Rao, M. R. K. and Raj, S. (2009). Transgenic Bt Cotton. Nagpur, Maharashtra, India: Central Institute of Cotton Research.Google Scholar
Rochester, I. J. and Peoples, M. (2005). Growing vetches in irrigated cotton systems inputs of fixed N, N fertilizer savings and cotton productivity. Plant and Soil 271:251–264.Google Scholar
Rochester, I. J., Peoples, M. B., Hullugalle, N. R., Gault, R. R. and Constable, G. A. (2001). Using legumes to enhance nitrogen fertility and improve soil condition in cotton cropping systems. Field Crops Research 70 (1):27–41.Google Scholar
Sharma, A. R. and Behera, U. K. (2009). Recycling of legume residues for nitrogen economy and higher productivity in maize–wheat cropping system. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem 83:197–210.Google Scholar
Sharma, P. K., Yadav, G. L. and Kumar, S. (2000). Response of wheat to nitrogen and zinc fertilization. Indian Journal of Agronomy 45 (1):124–127.Google Scholar
Singh, R. J. and Ahlawat, I. P. S. (2011). Productivity, competition indices and soil fertility changes of Bt cotton–peanut intercropping system using different fertility levels. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81 (7):606–611.Google Scholar
Singh, R. J., Ahlawat, I. P. S. and Gangaiah, B. (2009). Direct and residual effects of nitrogen requirement in Bt cotton–wheat cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 54 (4):401–408.Google Scholar
Singh, R. J., Ahlawat, I. P. S. and Singh, S. (2013). Effects of transgenic Bt cotton on soil fertility and biology under field conditions in subtropical Inceptisol. Environment Monitoring and Assessment 185 (1):485–495.Google Scholar
Subba Rao, G. V., Kumar Rao, J. V. D. K., Kumar, J., Johansen, C., Deb, U. K. and Ahmed, I. (2001). Spatial Distribution and Quantification of Rice Fallow in South Asia – Potential for Legumes. Hyderabad: ICRISAT and NRSA; UK: DFID, 315 pp.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping – its importance and research needs. Part. I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstract 32:1–10.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Spiertz, J. H. J., Zhang, S., Li, B. and Werf, W. V. D. (2008). Nitrogen economy in relay intercropping systems of wheat and cotton. Plant and Soil 303:55–68.Google Scholar