Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:48:54.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTEGRATING GENETICS AND NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FOR TECHNOLOGY TARGETING AND GREATER IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN THE SEMI-ARID TROPICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

STEVE TWOMLOW ,
BEKELE SHIFERAW ,
PETER COOPER  and
J. D. H. KEATINGE
STEVE TWOMLOW*
Affiliation:
ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India.
BEKELE SHIFERAW
Affiliation:
ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India.
PETER COOPER
Affiliation:
ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J. D. H. KEATINGE
Affiliation:
ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India.
*
†Corresponding author. Present address: ICRISAT-Zimbabwe, PO Box 776, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Good management of natural resources is the key to good agriculture. This is true everywhere – and particularly in the semi-arid tropics, where over-exploitation of fragile or inherently vulnerable agro-ecosystems is leading to land and soil degradation, productivity decline, and increasing hunger and poverty. Modern crop varieties offer high yields, but the larger share of this potential yield can only be realized with good crop management. The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), working over a vast and diverse mandate area, has learned one key lesson: that technologies and interventions must be matched not only to the crop or livestock enterprise and the biophysical environment, but also with the market and investment environment, including input supply systems and policy. Various Natural Resource Management (NRM) technologies have been developed over the years, but widespread adoption has been limited for various reasons: technical, socio-economic and institutional. To change this, ICRISAT hypothesizes that ‘A research approach, founded on the need to integrate a broad consideration of technical, socio-economic and institutional issues into the generation of agricultural innovations will result in a higher level of adoption and more sustainable and diverse impacts in the rainfed systems of the semi-arid tropics.’ Traditionally, crop improvement and NRM were seen as distinct but complementary disciplines. ICRISAT is deliberately blurring these boundaries to create the new paradigm of IGNRM or Integrated Genetic and Natural Resource Management. Improved varieties and improved resource management are two sides of the same coin. Most farming problems require integrated solutions, with genetic, management-related and socio-economic components. In essence, plant breeders and NRM scientists must integrate their work with that of private and public sector change agents to develop flexible cropping systems that can respond to rapid changes in market opportunities and climatic conditions. The systems approach looks at various components of the rural economy – traditional food grains, new potential cash crops, livestock and fodder production, as well as socio-economic factors such as alternative sources of employment and income. Crucially the IGNRM approach is participatory, with farmers closely involved in technology development, testing and dissemination. ICRISAT has begun to use the IGNRM approach to catalyse technology uptake and substantially improve food security and incomes in smallholder farm communities at several locations in India, Mali, Niger, Vietnam, China, Thailand and Zimbabwe.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 235 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adesina, A. A. and Chianu, J. (2002). Farmers' use and adaptation of alley farming in Nigeria. In Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture: Understanding and Improving Current Practices, 51–64 (Eds Barrett, C. B., Place, F. and Aboud, A. A.). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing with ICRAF.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1992). Difficulties in African agricultural systems enhancement? Ten hypotheses. Agricultural Systems 38: 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J. (2003). Introduction: uniting science and participation in the process of innovation – Research for Development. In Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods: Uniting Science and Participation, 1–15 (Eds Pound, B., Snapp, S., McDougall, C., and Braun, A.). London: IDRC and Earthscan Books.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. B., Place, F. and Aboud, A. A. (2002). Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture: Understanding and Improving Current Practices. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing with ICRAF.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. M. and Sayer, J. A. (eds) (2003). Integrated Natural Resource Management: Linking Productivity, the Environment and Development. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing with CIFOR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B., Sayer, J. A., Frost, P., Vermeulen, S., Ruiz Pérez, M., Cunningham, A. and Prabhu, R. (2001). Assessing the performance of natural resource systems. Conservation Ecology 5: 22. Available from www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B., Hagmann, J., Stroud, A., Thomas, R. and Wollenberg, E. (2006). Navigating Amidst Complexity: Guide to Manage R&D Interventions for Improving Livelihoods and The Environment. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
CAWMA (Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture) 2007. Water for Food, Water for Life: a Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
CGIAR, 2005. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. CGIAR System Research Priorities 2005–2015. Science Council Secretariat, September 2005. Available from www.sciencecouncil.CGIAR.org/activities/spps/pubs/prioritiesDec05.pdfGoogle Scholar
CIMMYT-SPIA. (2003). Why has impact assessment research not made more of a difference? Summary Proceedings of an International Conference on Impact of Agricultural Research and Development, 4–7 Feb 2002 San José, Costa Rica, organized by the CGIAR's Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) and CIMMYT.Google Scholar
DFID. (2003). Agriculture and poverty reduction: Unlocking the potential. United Kingdoms Department for International Development (DFID) Policy Paper, Dec 2003. Available from www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/agri-poverty-reduction.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dimes, J. P. (2005). Application of APSIM to evaluate crop improvement technologies for enhanced water use efficiency in Zimbabwe's SAT. In Management for Improved Water Use Efficiency in the Dry Areas of Africa and West Asia: Proceedings of a Workshop Organized by the Optimizing Soils Water Use (OSWU) Consortium. April 2002 Ankara, Turkey. Aleppo Syria: ICARDA and Patancheru, India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Dimes, J., Twomlow, S., Rusike, J., Gerard, B., Tabo, R., Freeman, A. and Keatinge, J. D. H. (2005). Increasing research impacts through low-cost soil fertility management options for Africa's drought-prone areas. In Sustainable Agriculture Systems for the Drylands. Proceedings of the International Symposium for Sustainable Dry land Agriculture Systems, 2–5 December, 2003. Niamey, Niger. 82–92.Google Scholar
Douthwaite, B., Delve, R., Ekboir, J. and Twomlow, S. J. (2003). Contending with complexity: the role of evaluation in implementing sustainable natural resource management. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 1:51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douthwaite, B., Ekboir, J., Twomlow, S. and Keatinge, J. D. H. (2004). The concept of INRM and implications for developing evaluation methods. In Natural Resource Management in Agriculture: Methods for Assessing the Economic and Environmental Impacts of Management Practices, 321–340 (Eds Shiferaw, B., Freeman, H. A., and Swinton, S. M.). Wallingford: CABI International.Google Scholar
Douthwaite, B., Baker, D., Weise, S., Gockowski, J., Manyong, V. M. and Keatinge, J. D. H. (2005) Ecoregional research in Africa: learning lessons from IITA's benchmark area approach. Experimental Agriculture 41:271–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis-Jones, J., Zvarevashe, V., Twomlow, S. and Stevenson, K. (2001). Increasing productivity and improving livelihoods in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Research development linkages, a case study from southern Zimbabwe. Landwards 56: 24–29.Google Scholar
Fan, S. and Hazell, P. (2000). Should developing countries invest more in less favoured areas? An empirical analysis of rural India. Economic and Political Weekly 35: 1455–1464.Google Scholar
Freeman, H. A., Rohrbach, D. D. and Ackello-Ogutu, C. (Eds), (2002). Targeting Agricultural Research for the Development of the Semi-arid Tropics of Sub-Saharan Africa. Summary Proceedings of a Workshop, 1–3 July 2002 Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Gladwin, C., Peterson, J. and Mwale, A. (2002). The quality of science in participatory research: A case study from Eastern Zambia. World Development 30:523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, R. R. and Kassam, A. H. (eds) (2003). Research towards Integrated Natural Resources Management: Examples of research problems, approaches and partnerships in action in the CGIAR. Washington DC: Interim Science Council, CGIAR.Google Scholar
Harwood, R. R., Kassam, A. H., Gregersen, H. M. and Ferres, E. (2005). Natural resources management research in the CGIAR: The role of the technical advisory committee. Experimental Agriculture 41: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, R. R., Place, F., Kassam, A. H. and Gregersen, H. M. (2006). International public goods through integrated natural resources management research in CGIAR partnerships. Experimental Agriculture 42: 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, G. M. (2004). The SADC/ICRISAT Sorghum and Millet Improvement Program: an overview. In A Foundation for the Future: the Sorghum and Millet Improvement Program (SMIP) in Southern Africa. Proceedings of the SMIP Final Review and Reporting Workshop, 25–26 Nov 2003, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, 9–15.Google Scholar
Kassam, A. H. (2006). Receptivity to social research by the CGIAR. Experimental Agriculture 42:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassam, A. H., Gregersen, H. M., Ferres, E., Javier, Q., Harwood, R. R., de Jancry, A. and Cernea, M. M. (2004). A framework for enhancing and guarding the relevance and quality of science: The case of the CGIAR. Experimental Agricuture 40:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, T. and Gregersen, H. (2003). NRM impact assessment in the CGIAR: meeting the challenge and implications for ICRISAT. In Methods for Assessing the Impacts of Natural Resource Management Research. Summary Proceedings of an International Workshop, 6–7 Dec 2002 ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, 105–115Google Scholar
Murwira, K., Hagmann, J. and Chuma, E. (2001). Mainstreaming participatory approaches in soil water conservation. In Farmer Innovation in Africa: a Source of Inspiration for Development, 310–324 (Eds Reij, C. and Waters-Bayer, A..). London: Earthscan Books.Google Scholar
Ncube, B., Dimes, J., Twomlow, S., Mupangwa, W. and Giller, K. (2007). Raising the productivity of smallholder farms under semi-arid conditions by use of small doses of manure and nitrogen: A case of participatory research. Nutrient Cycling in Agro-ecosystems 77, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, C. and Tschinkel, H. (2003). Improving watershed management in developing countries: A framework for prioritizing sites and practices. AgREN Network Paper No. 129, July 2003. London, UK: ODI.Google Scholar
Pound, B., Snapp, S., McDougall, C. and Braun, A. (eds) (2003). Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods: Uniting Science and Participation. London, UK: IDRC and Earthscan Books.Google Scholar
Pretty, J. and Hine, R. (2001). Reducing food poverty with sustainable agriculture: a summary of evidence. Final Report from SAFE-World Research Project. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. R. and Soussan, J. (2003). Assessing the impact of participatory watershed development: a sustainable rural livelihoods approach. In Methods for Assessing the Impacts of Natural Resource Management Research. Summary Proceedings of an International Workshop, 6–7 Dec 2002 ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, 84–93.Google Scholar
Rusike, J., Twomlow, S. J., Freeman, H. A. and Heinrich, G. M. (2006). Does farmer participatory research matter for improved soil fertility technology development and dissemination in Southern Africa? International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 4:176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J. G. and Spencer, D. C. (2001). Future Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural R&D in the Semi-Arid Tropics. Patancheru, India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Sayer, J. A. and Campbell, B. M. (2003). Research to integrate productivity enhancement, environmental protection, and human development. In Integrated Natural Resource Management: Linking Productivity, the Environment and Development, 1–14 (Eds Campbell, B. M. and Sayer, J. A..). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing with CIFOR.Google Scholar
Scherr, S. (2000). A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation. Food Policy 25:479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiferaw, B. and Freeman, H. A. (eds). (2003). Methods for Assessing the Impacts of Natural Resource Management Research. Summary Proceedings of an International Workshop, 6–7 Dec 2002 ICRISAT, Patancheru, India.Google Scholar
Shiferaw, B. and Bantilan, C. (2004). Rural poverty and natural resource management in less-favored areas: revisiting challenges and conceptual issues. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 2:328–339.Google Scholar
Shiferaw, B., Freeman, A. and Swinton, S. M. (eds). (2005). Natural Resource Management in Agriculture: Methods for Assessing the Economic and Environmental Impacts of Management Practices. Wallingford: CABI International.Google Scholar
Singh, A. and Trivedi, T. P. (2005). Creation of visible impact of integrated pest management in selected crops. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Pesticide Residues and their Risk Assessment, January 20–21 2005, National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, 137–144.Google Scholar
Snapp, S. and Heong, K. L. (2003). Scaling up and out. In Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods: Uniting Science and Participation, 67–83 (Eds Pound, B., Snapp, S., McDougall, C., and Braun, A..). London: IDRC and Earthscan Books.Google Scholar
Task Force on INRM, (2000). Integrated Natural Resource Management in the CGIAR. A brief report on the INRM workshop held in Penang, Malaysia, 15–21 August. Available from www.icarda.cgiar.org/INRMsite/documents/workshop_2000.htmGoogle Scholar
Templeton, S. R. and Scherr, S. R. (1999). Effects of demographic and related microeconomic change on land quality in hills and mountains of developing countries. World Development 27:903–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. (2005). Impact assessment and International Public Goods of NRM research. Report of the combined workshop of the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment and the 6th meeting of the CGIAR Task Force on INRM, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, 13–16 June 2005. Available from www.icarda.org/INRMsite/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Twomlow, S., Rohrbach, D., Rusikes, J., Mupnagwa, W., Dimes, J., Ncube, B., Hove, L., Moyo, L., Mashingaidze, N. and Maphosa, P. (2007). Micro-dosing as a pathway to Africa's Green Revolution: Confirmation from participatory on-farm trials. Paper presented at African Soil Fertility Network International Symposium ‘Africa's Green Revolution’. September 17–21 September, 2007, Arusha, Tanzania.Google Scholar
Yamano, T. and Jayne, S. (2004). Measuring the impacts of working-age adult mortality on small-scale farm households in Kenya. World Development, 32: 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar