Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:30:21.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMPROVING MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.) PERFORMANCE IN SEMI-ARID ZIMBABWE THROUGH MICRO-DOSING WITH AMMONIUM NITRATE TABLETS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2012

N. MASHINGAIDZE ,
P. BELDER ,
S. TWOMLOW ,
L. Hove  and
M. MOYO
N. MASHINGAIDZE
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT-Bulawayo, Matopos Research Station, P.O. Box 776, Bulawayo Department of Plant Production and Soil Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Republic of South Africa
P. BELDER
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT-Bulawayo, Matopos Research Station, P.O. Box 776, Bulawayo
S. TWOMLOW*
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT-Bulawayo, Matopos Research Station, P.O. Box 776, Bulawayo
L. Hove
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT-Bulawayo, Matopos Research Station, P.O. Box 776, Bulawayo
M. MOYO
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT-Bulawayo, Matopos Research Station, P.O. Box 776, Bulawayo
*
§Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Although the application of small quantities of nitrogen (N) fertiliser has improved cereal yields on low-input farms in semi-arid Zimbabwe, the practice is reported to be laborious and time-consuming by farmers. In an effort to make micro-dosing less labour-intensive and more precise, an ammonium nitrate (AN) tablet, the equivalent of a micro-dose of prill AN (28 kg N ha−1) applied per maize plant, was developed by International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics in collaboration with Agri-Seeds, Zimbabwe. This study characterized the physical stability, chemical (N% and solubility) and agronomic performance of AN tablets compared with prill AN. Only 10% of tablets broke when dropped from 2 m, showing that they are physically stable and can handle rough treatment. The N content in the tablets (33.3%) was comparable to that in prill AN (34.6%). However, the tablet formulation took twice as long to dissolve than prill AN when placed on a wet soil. Despite this difference in solubility, simple leaching column experiments suggest that less than 2% of the total AN applied was lost due to leaching. Agronomic trials were superimposed on the paired-plot demonstrations used to promote micro-dosing and the conservation agriculture tillage technique of planting basins from 2005 to 2008. Each tillage (plough and basins) plot was subdivided into three sub-plots on which no AN, prill AN and tableted AN treatments were superimposed. Maize was planted and management of plots was left to farmers. Micro-dosing with either prill or tableted AN significantly (p < 0.001) increased maize grain yield by over 40% in all seasons for planting basins. However, on the ploughed plot there was no yield benefit to using either AN formulation in the season with the lowest rainfall (2006–2007). There was no significant difference in grain yield and agronomic N use efficiency between prill and tableted AN formulations except for the 2005–2006 season in planting basins. During this season, in planting basins, tableted AN had significantly (p < 0.001) higher rainwater productivity than prill AN, which translated into greater grain yield. In addition, the maximum benefit to micro-dosing was observed to accrue when combined with water harvesting techniques such as planting basins. An observation supported by the host farmers, who in the second and third seasons chose to apply available basal soil fertility amendments to the basin plots over the flat plots. Thus, AN tablets if available at an affordable price can be used by smallholder farmers to more precisely apply N fertiliser. Future work should focus on the labour issues of micro-dosing, and making cost-effective tablets available to resource-poor farmers and also addressing other limiting soil nutrients.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 179 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. M. and Ingram, J. S. I. (1993). Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods, 2nd edn.Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 221 pp.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn.Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Balarin, J. J. (1982). National Reviews for Aquaculture Development in Africa: Zimbabwe. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 770.1. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Carberry, P., Gladwin, C. and Twomlow, S. (2004). Linking simulation modelling to participatory research in smallholder farming systems. In Modelling Nutrient Management in Tropical Cropping Systems, 32–46 (Eds Delve, R. and Probert, M.). ACIAR Proceedings No. 114. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Chikowo, R., Mapfumo, P., Nyamugafata, P. and Giller, K. E. (2003). Maize productivity and mineral dynamics following different soil fertility management practices on a depleted sandy soil in Zimbabwe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112:119–131.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) (2007). FAO/WFP crop and food supply assessment mission to Zimbabwe. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Special Report; World Food Programme, Rome, Italy. Available at: http://www.fao.org/giews (accessed 12 May 2009).Google Scholar
GenStat Release 9.1. Lawes Agricultural Trust. (2007). Rothamstead Experimental Station. Harpenden, UK.Google Scholar
Giller, K. E., Rowe, E. C., de Ridder, N. and van Keulen, H. (2006). Resource use dynamics and interactions in the tropics: scaling up in space and time. Agricultural Systems 88:8–27.Google Scholar
Hagmann, J. (1995). State and effectiveness of the mechanical conservation systems for rill erosion control in semi-arid Masvingo. In Soil and Water Conservation for Smallholder Farmers in Semi-Arid Zimbabwe: Transfer Between Research and Extension, 91–103 (EdsTwomlow, S., Ellis-Jones, J., Hagmann, J. and Loos, H.). Proceedings of the Feedback Workshop, Masvingo, Zimbabwe, 3–7 April 1995.Google Scholar
Kamanga, B. C. G, Shamudzarira, Z. and Waddington, S. R. (2001). On-farm comparison of fertiliser application practices to assess Nitrogen use efficiency with maize in Zimuto Communal Area, Zimbabwe. In Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, 11–15 February 2001 519–522.Google Scholar
Makanganise, A., Mabasa, S., Jasi, L. and Gatsi, T. (2001). Verification trials and farmer-managed demonstrations in integrated weed management under different tillage systems and fertility levels in smallholder farming areas of Zimbabwe. In Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Conference, 11–15 February 2001, 508–512.Google Scholar
Mugabe, F. T., Hodnett, M. G. and Senzanje, A. (2003). Opportunities for increasing productive water use from dam water: a case study from semi-arid Zimbabwe. Agricultural Water Management 62:149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugabe, F. T., Hodnett, M. G., Senzanje, A. and Gonah, T. (2004). Spatio-temporal rainfall and runoff variability of the Runde Catchment, Zimbabwe and the implication on surface water resources. African Water Journal 1:66–79.Google Scholar
Mupangwa, W. (2009). Water and Nitrogen Management for Risk Mitigation in Semi-Arid Cropping Systems. PhD Thesis, University of the Free State, Republic of South Africa, 351 pp.Google Scholar
Mushayi, P. T., Waddington, S. R. and Chiduza, C. (1998). Low efficiency of nitrogen use by maize on smallholder farms in sub-humid Zimbabwe. In Sixth Eastern & Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 278–281. Texcoco, México: CIMMYT and the Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organisation.Google Scholar
Ncube, B., Twomlow, S. J., Dimes, J. P., van Wijk, M. T. and Giller, K. E. (2009, March). Resource flows, crops and soil fertility management in smallholder farming systems in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Soil Use and Management 25:78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ncube, B., Twomlow, S. J., van Wijk, M. T., Dimes, J. P. and Giller, K. E. (2007). Productivity and residual benefits of grain legumes to sorghum under semi-arid conditions in south-western Zimbabwe. Plant and Soil 299 (1):1–15.Google Scholar
Nyamangara, J. (2007). Mineral nitrogen distribution in the soil profile of a maize field amended with cattle manure and mineral N under sub-humid tropical conditions. In Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities, 737–748 (EdsBationo, A., Waswa, B., Kihara, J. and Kimetu, J.). Berlin: Springer. ISBN: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5760-1-69.Google Scholar
Nyamangara, J., Bergström, L. F., Piha, M. I. and Giller, K. E. (2003). Fertiliser use efficiency and nitrate leaching in a tropical sandy soil. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:599–606.Google Scholar
Nyamapfene, K. (1991). Soils of Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe: Nehanda Publishers.Google Scholar
Rockström, J. (2000). Water resources management in smallholder farms in eastern and southern Africa: an overview. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (B) 25:275–283.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Barron, J. and Fox, P. (2003). Water productivity in rain-fed agriculture: challenges and opportunities for smallholder farmers in drought-prone tropical agroecosystems. In Water Productivity in Agriculture: Opportunities for Improvement (Eds Kijne, J. W., Barker, R. and Molden, D.). Oxfordshire, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Kaumbutho, P., Mwalley, J., Nzabi, A. W., Temesgen, M., Mawenya, L., Barron, J., Mutua, J. and Damgaard-Larsen, S. (2008). Conservation farming strategies in East and Southern Africa: yields and rain water productivity from on-farm action research. Soil & Tillage Research 103 (2009):23–32.Google Scholar
Rusike, J., Dimes, J. P. and Twomlow, S. J. (2003). Risk-return trade-offs of smallholder investments in improved soil fertility management technologies in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe. Paper Presented at the 25th Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economics, Durban, South Africa, 16–22 August 2003.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P. A. (2002). Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295 (5562):2019–2020.Google Scholar
Steiner, K. G. and Rockström, J. (2003). Increasing rainwater productivity with conservation tillage. African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT), Information series No. 5. GTZ.Google Scholar
Steiner, K. G. and Twomlow, S. (2003). Weed management in conservation tillage systems. African Conservation Tillage Network, Information series No. 8. GTZ.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) (2001). Water Harvesting for Upgrading of Rain-Fed Agriculture. Problem Analysis and Research Needs. SIWI Report no. 11. Stockholm, Sweden: SIWI, 97 pp.Google Scholar
Tabo, R., Bationo, A., Gerard, B., Ndjeunga, J., Marchal, D., Amadou, B., Annou, G., Sogodogo, D., Taonda, J. B., Hassane, S., Maimouna, O., Diallo, K. and Koala, S. (2007). Improving cereal productivity and farmers’ income using a strategic application of fertilisers in West Africa. In Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities, 201–208 (Eds Bationo, A., Waswa, B., Kihara, J. and Kimetu, J.). Netherlands: Springer (www.springer.com). ISBN: 3 78-4020-575-5.Google Scholar
Twomlow, S., Hove, L., Mupangwa, W., Masikati, P. and Mashingaidze, N. (2009). Precision conservation agriculture for vulnerable farmers in low-potential zones. In Increasing the Productivity and Sustainability of Rainfed Cropping Systems of Poor Smallholder Farmers, 37–54 (Eds Humphreys, E. and Bayot, R. S.). Proceedings of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food International Workshop on Rainfed Cropping Systems, Tamale, Ghana, 22‐-25 September 2008, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
Twomlow, S., Rohrbach, D., Dimes, J., Rusike, J., Mupangwa, W., Ncube, B., Hove, L., Moyo, M., Mashingaidze, N. and Maphosa, P. (2010). Micro dosing as a pathway to Africa's Green Revolution: evidence from broad scale on-farm trials. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 88:3–15.Google Scholar
Twomlow, S. J., Rohrbach, D., Rusike, J., Mupangwa, W., Dimes, J. and Ncube, B. (2006b). Spreading the World on Fertiliser in Zimbabwe. Global Theme on Agro Ecosystems Report No. 24, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Twomlow, S. J., Steyn, T. and du Preez, C. C. (2006a). Dryland farming in Southern Africa. In Dryland Agriculture, 2nd Edn. Chapter 19, 769–836 (Eds Pearson, G. A., Unger, P. W. and Payne, W. E.), Agronomy Monograph Series No. 23. Madison, Wisconsin:American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Twomlow, S. J., Urolov, J. C., Oldrieve, B. and Jenrich, M. (2008, December). Lessons from the field − Zimbabwe's Conservation Agriculture Task Force. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research 6 (1):1–11.Google Scholar
Vincent, V. and Thomas, R. G. (1960). An Agricultural Survey of Southern Rhodesia. Part 1. Agro-Ecological Survey. Causeway, Salisbury, Rhodesia: Government Printers.Google Scholar