Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:47:20.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GROWTH AND YIELD OF COMMON BEAN AS AFFECTED BY SEED INOCULATION WITH RHIZOBIUM AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2016

RODRIGO LUIZ NEVES BARROS ,
LEANDRO BARBOSA DE OLIVEIRA ,
WELLITON BARROS DE MAGALHÃES  and
CARLOS PIMENTEL
RODRIGO LUIZ NEVES BARROS
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia, Instituto de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Km 47 BR 465, Seropédica, RJ, 23897-000, Brazil
LEANDRO BARBOSA DE OLIVEIRA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia, Instituto de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Km 47 BR 465, Seropédica, RJ, 23897-000, Brazil
WELLITON BARROS DE MAGALHÃES
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia, Instituto de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Km 47 BR 465, Seropédica, RJ, 23897-000, Brazil
CARLOS PIMENTEL*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fitotecnia, Instituto de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Km 47 BR 465, Seropédica, RJ, 23897-000, Brazil
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two field experiments were conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 to evaluate the effects of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) and/or sowing N fertilization on the growth and yield of Phaseolus vulgaris L. In addition, leaf soluble protein content (LSPC) was measured at four growth stages in both seasons. Plants were subjected to the following treatments: only fertilized with 20 kg N ha−1 at sowing and with 40 kg N ha−1 at 25 days after emergence (DAE) (F); only inoculated with Rhizobium tropici strain SEMIA 4080 at sowing and fertilized with 40 kg N ha−1 at 25 DAE (I+N); and inoculated and fertilized with 20 kg N ha−1 at sowing and with 40 kg N ha−1 at 25 DAE (IF). An additional treatment was done only in the second season and plants were inoculated with no N fertilization at any phase (I−N). Crop growth rate and leaf area index were enhanced by IF and F treatments as compared to I+N treatment, however, net assimilation rate did not differ among the treatments. At the pollination and flowering stages for seasons, LSPC was significantly increased by IF treatment, which also caused the highest final yield compared with the remaining treatments in both seasons. Therefore, the fertilization with 20 kg N ha−1 at sowing together with inoculation and 40 kg N ha−1 at 25 DAE is recommended for obtaining high yield in bean cultivation with high technology. As the inoculation with Rhizobium at sowing and fertilization with 40 kg N ha−1 at 25 DAE (I+N) had the same crop yield as plants fertilized at sowing and at 25 DAE (F), it can be recommended for a low-cost technology cultivation employed by small farmers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 16 - 30
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72:248–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardoso, J. D., Hungria, M. and Andrade, D. S. (2012). Polyphasic approach for the characterization of rhizobial symbionts effective in fixing N2 with common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 93:2035–2049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farid, M. and Navabi, A. (2015). N2 fixation ability of different dry bean genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 95:1243–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrar, J. F. (1995). Carbon partitioning. In Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment-A field and laboratory manual, 222–246 (Eds Hall, D. O., Scurlock, J. M. O., Bolhàr-Nordenkampf, H. R., Leegood, R. C. and Long, S. P.). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Gomes, A. A., Araújo, A. P., Rossiello, R. O. P. and Pimentel, C. (2000). Acumulação de biomassa, características fisiológicas e rendimento de grãos em cultivares de feijoeiro irrigado e sob sequeiro. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 35:1927–1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungria, M., Campo, R. J. and Mendes, I. C. (2003). Benefits of inoculation of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop with efficient and competitive Rhizobium tropici strains. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39:88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungria, M. and Kaschuk, G. (2014). Regulation of N2 fixation and NO3 −/NH4 + assimilation in nodulated and N-fertilized Phaseolus vulgaris L. exposed to high. Environmental and Experimental Botany 98:32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, R. (1978). Plant Growth Analysis. London: Eduard Arnold.Google Scholar
Long, S. P., Zhu, X. G., Naidu, S. L. and Ort, D. R. (2006). Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant, Cell Environmental 29:315–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nova-Franco, B., Íñiguez, L. P., Valdés-López, O., Alvarado-Affantranger, X., Leija, A., Fuentes, S. I., Ramírez, M., Paul, S., Reyes, L., Girard, L. and Hernández, G. (2015). The Micro-RNA172c-APETALA2-1 Node as a Key Regulator of the common bean-Rhizobium etli nitrogen fixation symbiosis. Plant Physiology 168:273–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimentel, C. (2006). Efficiency of nutrient use by crops for low input agro-environments. In Nitrogen Nutrition in Plant Productivity, 277–328 (Eds Singh, R. P., Shankar, N. and Jaiwal, P. K.). Houston, Studium Press.Google Scholar
Pimentel, C., Laffray, D. and Louguet, P. (1999). Intrinsic water use efficiency at the pollination stage as a parameter for drought tolerance selection in Phaseolus vulgaris . Physiologia Plantarum 106:184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remigi, P., Zhu, J., Young, J. P. W. and Masson-Boivin, C. (2016). Symbiosis within symbiosis: Evolving nitrogen-fixing legume symbionts. Trends in Microbiology, 24:63–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieira, C., de Paula Júnior, T. J. and Borém, A. (2006). Feijão. 2ª Edição Revisada e Ampliada. 600. Viçosa: Editora UFV, Universidade Federal de Viçosa.Google Scholar
Worku, W. (2014). Sequential intercropping of common bean and mung bean with maize in Southern Ethiopia. Experimental Agriculture 50:90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yemm, E. W. and Coocking, E. C. (1955). The determination of amino acids with ninhydrin. Analyst 80:209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Barros supplementary material S1

Supplementary Figure

Download Barros supplementary material S1(Image)
Image 4.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Barros supplementary material S2

Supplementary Table

Download Barros supplementary material S2(File)
File 13.1 KB