Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:17:09.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of primary tillage and soil amendment practices on pearl millet yield and nutrient uptake in the Sahel of West Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2001

F. N. IKPE
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, BP 12404 Niamey, Niger
J. M. POWELL
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, BP 12404 Niamey, Niger
N. O. ISIRIMAH
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, BP 12404 Niamey, Niger
T. A. T. WAHUA
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, BP 12404 Niamey, Niger
E. M. NGODIGHA
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, BP 12404 Niamey, Niger

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to determine the best soil amendment and tillage practices for sustainable millet yield and grain and stover quality. The treatments included tillage practices (immediate-, late- and no-till) and soil amendments (sheep manure plus urine, manure, millet stover (stalks, leaf blades and leaf sheaths) and millet stover ash) in factorial combinations with fertilizer nitrogen levels of 0, 15 and 30 kg ha−1 plus controls. Results showed that (i) higher yields were obtained in tilled plots than in no-till plots; (ii) tillage timing may not be a significant yield determining factor; (iii) the application of animal urine resulted in significantly higher yield and greater nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake than the application either of manure alone or of millet stover. Urine application (ruminant urine contains virtually no phosphorus), which elevates soil pH especially during the first week after application, may have resulted in the dissolution of phosphorus from the aluminium–iron complexes of kaolinitic clays. This is corroborated by the significantly higher phosphorus uptake from the manure-plus-urine plots than from plots amended with either manure alone or millet stover. Long-term implications of ‘mining’ soil phosphorus with repeated applications of animal urine in these fragile ecosystems remains unclear.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)