Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:30:09.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF COMBINING ORGANIC MATERIALS WITH INORGANIC PHOSPHORUS SOURCES ON MAIZE YIELD AND FINANCIAL BENEFITS IN WESTERN KENYA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2009

P. A. OPALA ,
C. O. OTHIENO ,
J. R. OKALEBO  and
P. O. KISINYO
P. A. OPALA*
Affiliation:
Moi University, Department of Soil Science, P.O. Box 1125 Eldoret, Kenya
C. O. OTHIENO
Affiliation:
Moi University, Department of Soil Science, P.O. Box 1125 Eldoret, Kenya
J. R. OKALEBO
Affiliation:
Moi University, Department of Soil Science, P.O. Box 1125 Eldoret, Kenya
P. O. KISINYO
Affiliation:
Moi University, Department of Soil Science, P.O. Box 1125 Eldoret, Kenya
*
†Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Due to escalating costs of imported fertilizers, there is renewed interest in the use of local nutrient resources in managing soil fertility in Kenya. We tested the effect of two organic materials, farmyard manure (FYM) and Tithonia diversifolia (tithonia), and an inorganic N fertilizer, urea, when applied alone or in combination with three inorganic P sources, triple superphosphate (TSP), Minjingu phosphate rock (MPR) and Busumbu phosphate rock (BPR), on maize yields and financial benefits. The study was conducted for three consecutive seasons, from March 2007 to August 2008 in western Kenya. FYM and tithonia were applied to supply 20 kg P ha−1 in treatments where they were used either alone or in combination with the inorganic P sources while 40 kg P ha−1 was from the inorganic P sources in the combination. Where urea was used, the inorganic P sources were applied at 60 kg P ha−1. When applied in combination with urea, MPR was a better P source for maize than TSP or BPR. However, when applied in combination with FYM or tithonia, TSP was the best P source. Treatments including tithonia were more effective in increasing maize yields than those without it with a similar total P application rate. The agronomic effectiveness of tithonia did not, however, translate to economic attractiveness, mainly due to very high labour costs associated with its use. FYM when applied alone at 20 kg P ha−1 was the only treatment that exceeded a benefit:cost ratio of 2 and, therefore, the most likely, of the tested technologies to be adopted by farmers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 23 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. M. and Ingram, J. S. I. (1993). Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A handbook of methods. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
FAO (2006). Efficiency of soil and fertilizer phosphorus use: Reconciling changing concepts of soil phosphorus behavior with agronomic information. Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin no. 18. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
FAO/UNESCO (1988). Soil map of the world: revised legend. World Soil Res. Rep. no. 60. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Farina, M. P. W and Chanon, P. (1991). A field comparison of lime requirement indices for maize. Plant and Soil 134: 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FURP (1987). Fertilizer use recommendation project report. A compilation of results from former fertilizer trials in Kenya. Ministry of Agriculture, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
GENSTAT (1993). Gensat 5 Release 3.2 Reference Manual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, R. J. and Mokolobate, M. S. (2001). Amelioration of aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in acid soils by additions of organic residues: a critical review of the phenomenon and mechanisms involved. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 59: 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyamuremye, F., Dick, R. P. and Baham, J. (1996). Organic amendments and phosphorus dynamics. I. Phosphorus chemistry and sorption. Soil Science 161: 426–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jama, B. and van Straaten, . (2006). Potential of East African phosphate rock deposits in integrated nutrient management strategies. Annals of Brazilian Academy of Sciences. 78: 781–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jama, B., Palm, C. A, Buresh, R. J., Niang, A. I., Gachengo, C., Nziguheba, G. and Amadalo, B. (2000). Tithonia diversifolia as a green manure for soil fertility improvement in Western Kenya., A review. Agroforestry Systems. 49: 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jama, B., Buresh, R. J. and Place, F. (1998). Sesbania tree fallows on phosphorus deficient site: maize yields and financial benefit. Agronomy Journal 90: 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jama, B., Swinkels, R. A. and Buresh, R. J. (1997). Agronomic and economic evaluation of organic and inorganic sources of phosphorus in western Kenya. Agronomy Journal 89: 597–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, E.O. (1965). Soil pH and lime requirement. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, 199–223 (Ed. Black, C. A.). ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Mucheru-Muna, M., Mugendi, D., Kungu, J., Mugwe, J. and Bationo, A. (2007). Effects of organic and mineral fertilizer inputs on maize yield and soil chemical properties in a maize cropping system in Meru South District, Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 69: 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narambuye, F. X. and Haynes, R. J. (2006). Short-term effects of three animal manures on soil pH and aluminum solubility. Australian Journal of Soil Research 44: 515–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, S. R. and Sommers, L. E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd edn. 539–579 (Ed. Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Nziguheba, G., Palm, C. A., Buresh, R. J. and Smithson, P. C. (1998). Soil P fractions and adsorption as affected by organic and inorganic sources. Plant and Soil 198: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nziguheba, G., Merckx, R., Palm, C. A. and Mutuo, P. (2002). Combining Tithonia diversifolia and fertilizers for maize production in phosphorus deficient soil in Kenya. Agroforestry Systems. 55: 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okalebo, J. R., Gathua, K. W. and Woomer, P. L. (2002). Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis. A Working Manual, 2nd edn. TSBF-CIAT, SACRED Africa, KARI, SSEA, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Palm, C. A., Myers, R. J. K. and Nandwa, S. (1997). Combined use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources for soil fertility replenishment. In Replenishing Soil Fertility in Africa, 193–217 (Eds Buresh, R. J., Sanchez, P. A., and Calhoun, F.). Soil Science Society of America Special Publication Number 51, Madison, WI, USA: SSSA.Google Scholar
Palm, C. A., Gachengo, C., Delve, R., Cadisch, G. and Giller, K. E. (2001). Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: Application of an organic resource database. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 83: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufino, M. C., Rowe, E. C., Delve, R. and Giller, K. (2006). Nitrogen cycling efficiencies through resource-poor African crop-livestock systems. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 112: 261–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanlauwe, B. (2004). Integrated soil fertility management research at TSBF: The framework, the principles, and their application, In Managing Nutrient Cycles to Sustain Soil Fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa, 25–42. (Ed. Bationo, A.). Nairobi, Kenya: Academy Sciences Publishers.Google Scholar