Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:27:57.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Cumulative Erosion and Rainfall on Sorghum, Pearl Millet and Castor Bean Yields Under Dry Farming Conditions in Andhra Pradesh, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

K. P. R. Vittal ,
K. Vijayalakshmi  and
U. M. B. Rao
K. P. R. Vittal
Affiliation:
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad - 500 659, India
K. Vijayalakshmi
Affiliation:
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad - 500 659, India
U. M. B. Rao
Affiliation:
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad - 500 659, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Topsoil depth and yields of sorghum, pearl millet and castor bean were found to be positively correlated when monitored over thirteen seasons under widely varying rainfall conditions on an Alfisol in Andhra Pradesh, India. Yields responded up to 2.5 times more to topsoil depth when rainfall in the critical period exceeded evapotranspiration than under drier conditions. Yield variations were explained by topsoil depth in cereals, and by the interaction between rainfall during the critical period and topsoil depth in cereals and castor bean (R2<0.72). The expected yield losses as a result of erosion, based on 56 years of rainfall data, were 138, 84 and 51 kg ha−1 cm−1 for sorghum, pearl millet and castor bean, respectively. Quadratic models explained the yield losses due to cumulative erosion under conditions of both poor and good rainfall during the critical period. Sorghum and pearl millet tended to produce no yield when erosion exceeded 34 cm and castor bean when it exceeded 40 cm. There was less reduction in yield when rainfall was poor, up to about 10 cm of erosion, than when rainfall was good. The results indicate that pearl millet and castor bean are more suitable than sorghum for low rainfall and eroded conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , October 1990 , pp. 429 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Black, C. A. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Agronomy series No. 9: Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busacca, A. J., McCool, D. K., Papendick, K. I. & Young, D. L. (1985). Dynamic impact of erosion processes on productivity of soils in the Palouse. Erosion and Soil Productivity. American Society of Agricultural Engineering Publications 8–85: 152–169.Google Scholar
Eck, H. V. (1968). Effect of top soil removal on nitrogen supplying ability of Pullman silty clay loam. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 32: 686–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Swaify, S. A., Singh, S. & Pathak, P. (1987). Physical and conservation constraints and management components for SAT alfisols. In Alfisols in the Semi-arid Tropics; A consultants workshop, December 1–3, 1983, 33–48. Hyderabad: International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Engelstad, O. P. & Shrader, W. D. (1961). The effect of surface soil thickness on corn yields: II. As determined by an experiment using normal surface soil and artificially exposed sub-soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 25: 497–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelstad, O. P., Shrader, W. D. & Dumen, I. L. (1961). The effect of surface soil thickness on corn yields: I. As determined by series of field experiments in farmer operated fields. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 25: 494–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, T. E. (1980). Soil erosion in the corn belt – problems and solutions. In Proceedings of Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology Symposium, 17–20. Atlanta, Georgia:Soil Erosion and Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
Fournier, F. (1963). The Soils of Africa. A Review of Natural Resources of African Continent. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Lal, R. (1986). Soil surface management in the tropics for intensive land use and high and sustained production. In Advances in Soil Science Vol. 5, 1–109 (Ed. Stewart, B. A.). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Langdale, G. W., Box, J. E., Leonard, R. A., Barnett, A. P. & Fleming, W. G. (1979). Corn yield reduction on eroded southern Piedmont soil. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 34: 226–228.Google Scholar
Lyles, L. (1975). Possible effects of wind erosion on soil productivity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 30: 279–283.Google Scholar
Mbagwu, J. S. C., Lal, R. & Scott, T. W. (1984). Effects of desurfacing of alfisols and ultisols in Southern Nigeria. I. Crop performance. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48: 828–833.Google Scholar
Monnier, G. (1971). Lysimeter studies of the relationship between depth of soil and crop yield. Annales Agronomiques 22: 183–195.Google Scholar
Odell, R. T. (1950). Measurements of the productivity of soils under various environmental conditions Agronomy Journal 42: 282–292.Google Scholar
Rao, U. M. B. & Vijayalakshmi, K. (1985). Crops and Cropping Systems for Semi-arid Red Soils of Telangana Region. Research Bulletin No. 4. Hyderabad: Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture.Google Scholar
Sarker, R. P. & Biswas, B. C. (1978). Agricultural meteorology in India. A status report. In Proceedings of Agroclimatological Research Needs of the Semi-arid Tropics, 37–46. Hyderabad: International Crops Research Institute for Semi-arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Schertz, J. M. (1984). The basis for soil loss tolerance. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38: 10–14.Google Scholar
Singh, S. N. (1978). Main Characteristics of South West Monsoon over Different Parts of the Country. Ag. Climate 3. Hyderabad: All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture.Google Scholar
Stocking, M. (1984). Erosion and Soil Productivity. A Review. FAO Consultants Report No. 1. Rome: Land and Water Development Division, FAO.Google Scholar