Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:28:59.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Criteria for Clonal Selection in Tea (Camellia sinensis). I. The Relation Between Mother Bushes and their Clonal Derivatives for Bush Area, Shoot Number and Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

H. E. Nyirenda  and
V. E. T. Ridpath
H. E. Nyirenda
Affiliation:
Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa, PO Box 51, Mulanje, Malawi
V. E. T. Ridpath
Affiliation:
Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa, PO Box 51, Mulanje, Malawi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Bush area, shoot number and yield were all strongly and positively correlated in 100 young seedling tea bushes. Clones derived from the bushes exhibited characteristics which were correlated with those of the mother bushes, indicating the usefulness of these observations in the selection of clones for improved performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1984 , pp. 339 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arifin, S. (1978). Preliminary report on mother bush selection at Kayu Aro Estate. Warta BPTK4 (Indonesia). In Proceedings of the Second Tea Symposium,Prapat,10 16–19, 1978,265–272.Google Scholar
Bendall, D. A. (1959). Biochemistry of tea fermentation. Annual Report of the Tea Research Station, Nyasaland 1958–59: 24–26.Google Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R., Njuguna, C. K., Ford, E. D. & Smith, R. (1977). Variation in yield among competing individuals within mixed genotype stands of tea: A selection problem. Journal of Applied Ecology 14: 969–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deveria, V. E. T. & Nyirenda, H. E. (1978). Testing and selection. Annual Report of the Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa 1977–78: 82.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. T. & Grice, W. J. (1979). Fertilizer for tea in Central and Southern Africa. Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa Planter's Handbook, 06 1966, Revised June 1979.Google Scholar
Green, M. J. (1965). Report of the Tea Research Institute of East Africa: 58–59.Google Scholar
Green, M. J. (1971). An evaluation of some criteria used in selecting large yielding tea clones. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76: 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, P. J. & Ellis, R. T. (1972). Estimation of the market value of Central African tea by theaflavin analysis. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 23: 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulasegaram, S. (1980). Technical developments in tea production. Tea Quarterly 49: 157–174.Google Scholar
Njuguna, C. K. (1981). Interplant competition study. Annual Report of the Tea Research Foundation of Kenya 1981, p. 37.Google Scholar
Nyirenda, H. E. & Ridpath, V. E. T. (1980). Green leaf yield trials. Annual Report of the Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa 1979/80: 87–93.Google Scholar
Sanderson, G. W. (1963). The chloroform test – A study of its suitability as a means of rapidly evaluating fermenting properties of clones. Tea Quarterly 34: 193–196.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. S. (1976). United Planters' Association of Southern India Annual Report for 1976, Botany Division: 11–38.Google Scholar