Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:19:47.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Conduct of ‘Post-Mortems’ on Concluded Field Trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

S. C. Pearce
S. C. Pearce
Affiliation:
University of Kent at Canterbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The design of field trials sometimes raises queries (which often go unanswered) about alternative designs and the best ways of allowing for environmental variation in the area allotted to the experiment. It is shown how recent developments in iterative methods for working out analyses of variance make possible the determination of error for systems of blocks other than the one actually used, and also for the row-and-column case. Some suggestions are also made for judging the error to be expected if plots were made larger.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 151 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corsten, L. C. A. (1958). Meded. Landbouw. Wageningen, 58, 1.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. H. (1975). J. R. Statist. Soc. B37, 114.Google Scholar
Kuiper, N. H. (1952). Statistica 6, 149.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1963). J. R. Statist. Soc. A126, 353.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1975). Appl. Statist. 24, 60.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. G., Caliński, T. & Marshall, T. F. de C. (1974). Biometrika 61, 449.Google Scholar
Worthington, B. A. (1975). Biometrika 62, 113.Google Scholar