Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:31:24.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF UREA N, POULTRY MANURE AND THEIR COMBINATION IN CHANGING SOIL PROPERTIES AND MAIZE PRODUCTIVITY UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS IN NORTHEAST PAKISTAN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2010

M. KALEEM ABBASI ,
ABDUL KHALIQ ,
M SHAFIQ ,
MUSHTAQ KAZMI  and
IMRAN ALI
M. KALEEM ABBASI
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Faculty of Agriculture, Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
ABDUL KHALIQ*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Faculty of Agriculture, Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
M SHAFIQ
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Faculty of Agriculture, Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
MUSHTAQ KAZMI
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Faculty of Agriculture, Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
IMRAN ALI
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Faculty of Agriculture, Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
*
†Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of poultry manure, urea N and the integrated use of both in changing soil properties, nutrient uptake, yield and yield attributes of maize grown at Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Treatments include control without any amendment (N0); urea N (UN) = 120 kg N ha−1 (N120U); UN = 150 kg N ha−1(N150U); poultry manure (PM) = 120 kg N ha−1(N120PM); PM = 150 kg N ha−1(N150PM); UN = 90 kg N ha−1+ PM = 30 kg N ha−1(N90U+30PM); UN = 60 kg N ha−1+ PM = 60 kg N ha−1(N60U+60PM); UN = 30 kg N ha−1+ PM = 90 kg N ha−1(N30U+90PM). N fertilization from different sources and combinations increased dry matter yield from 5206 kg ha−1 in the control to 5605–5783 kg ha−1 and grain yield increased from 1911 kg ha−1 to 2065–3763 kg ha−1. Application of the highest rate of urea N recorded the highest grain yields of 3763 kg ha−1, double the control. The proportional increase for N90U+30PM and N60U+60PM was 85 and 83% while PM alone gave lower yields (41 and 44%) than the respective urea N treatments. Integrated use of urea + PM proved superior to other treatments in enhancing the uptake of N, P and K in plants. Averaged across two years, uptake of N, P and K in N90U+30PM and N60U+60PM was 88 and 85, 16.5 and 17.5, and 48.5 and 53.5 kg ha−1, respectively compared to 52.5, 11.5 and 33.5 kg ha−1 in the control. Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) varied from 29% in PM treatments to 30–39% in combined treatments while NUE of 40% was recorded for urea N treatments. Application of PM lowered soil bulk density from 1.19 t m−3 in the control to 1.10 and 1.05 t m−3 in N120PM and N150U, enhanced pH from 7.39 to 7.65 and 7.78 and increased soil organic matter (22 and 32%), total N (21 and 26%), available P (44 and 55%) and available K (10 and 15%) compared with the control. Economic analysis suggested the use of 50% recommended mineral N (60 kg N ha−1) with PM saves the mineral N fertilizer by almost 50% compared to a system with only mineral N application. In addition, increase in N efficiency, plant nutrition and soil fertility associated with combined treatment would help to minimize the use of high cost synthetic mineral fertilizers and represents an environmentally and agronomically sound management strategy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 211 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbasi, M. K. and Adams, W. A. (1998). Loss of nitrogen in compacted grassland soil by simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Plant and Soil 200: 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, M. K., Kazmi, M. and Hussan, F. (2005). Nitrogen use efficiency and herbage production of an established grass sward in relation to moisture and nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Plant Nutrition 28: 1693–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, M. K., Hina, M., Khalique, A. and Khan, S. R. (2007). Mineralization of three organic manures used as nitrogen source in a soil incubated under laboratory conditions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 38: 1691–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, M. K., Majeed, A., Sadiq, A. and Khan, S. R. (2008). Application of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and phosphorus fertilization improved growth, yield and nodulation of soybean in the sub-humid hilly region of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Plant Production Science 11: 368–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adediran, J. A., Taiwo, L. B. and Sobulo, R. A. (2003). Organic wastes and their effect on tomato (Lycopersicum esculentus) yield. African Soils 33: 99–116.Google Scholar
Adeli, A., Sistani, K. R., Rowe, D. E. and Tewolde, H. (2005). Effects of broiler litter on soybean production and soil nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations. Agronomy Journal 97: 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adeniyan, O. N. and Ojeniyi, S. O. (2005). Effect of poultry manure, NPK 15–15–15 and combination of their reduced levels on maize growth and soil chemical properties. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science 15: 34–41.Google Scholar
Adesodun, J. K., Mbagwu, J. S. C. and Oti, N. (2005). Distribution of carbon nitrogen and phosphorus in water stable aggregates of an organic waste amended ultisol in southern Nigeria. Bioresource Technolology 96: 509–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agbede, T. M. and Ojeniyi, S. O. (2009) Tillage and poultry manure effects on soil fertility and sorghum yield in southwestern Nigeria. Soil & Tillage Research 104: 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akande, M. O. and Adediran, J. A. (2004). Effects of terralyt plus fertilizer on growth nutrients uptake and dry matter yield of two vegetable crops. Moor Journal of Agriculture Research 5: 12–107.Google Scholar
Ayoola, O. T. and Adeniyan, O. N. (2006). Influence of poultry manure and NPK fertilizer on yield and yield components of crops under different cropping systems in south west Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 5: 1386–1392.Google Scholar
Bationo, A. and Mokwunye, A. U. (1991). Role of manures and crop residues in alleviating soil fertility constraints to crop production, with special reference to the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa. Fertilizer Research 29: 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayu, W., Rethman, N. F. G., Hammes, P. S., and Alemu, G. (2006). Effects of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers on sorghum growth, yield, and nitrogen use in a semi-arid area of Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29: 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. and Mulvaney, C. S. (1982). Nitrogen-total. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 595–624 (Eds Page, A. L., Miller, R H and Keeney, D. R.) American Society of Agronomy Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Connor, D. J. (2008). Organic agriculture cannot feed the world. Field Crops Research 106: 187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJager, A., Onduru, D., VanWijk, M. S., Vlaming, J. and Gachini, G. N. (2001). Assessing sustainability of low external input farm management systems with the nutrient monitoring approach: a case study in Kenya. Agricultural Systems 69: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dordas, C. A., Lithourgidis, A. S., Matsi, T. and Barbayiannis, N. (2008). Application of liquid cattle manure and inorganic fertilizers affect dry matter, nitrogen accumulation, and partitioning in maize. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 80: 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, S., Pal, R., Chakraborty, A. and Chakrabarti, K. (2003). Influence of integrated plant nutrient supply system on soil quality restoration in a red and laterite soil. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 49: 631–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eghball, B., Ginting, D. and Gilley, J. E. (2004). Residual effects of manure and compost applications on corn production and soil properties. Agronomy Journal 96: 442–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewulo, B. S., Ojeniyi, S. O. and Akanni, D. A. (2008). Effect of poultry manure on selected soil physical and chemical properties, growth, yield and nutrient status of tomato African Journal of Agricultural Research 3: 612–616.Google Scholar
Gopinath, K. A., Saha, S., Mina, B. I., Pande, H., Kundu, S., and Gupta, H. S. (2008). Influence of organic amendments on growth, yield and quality of wheat and on soil properties during transition to organic production. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 82: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M. H., Haynes, R. J., and Meyer, J. H. (2002). Changes in soil chemistry and aggregate stability induced by fertilizer applications, burning and trash retention on a long-term sugarcane experiment in South Africa. European Journal of Soil Science 53: 589–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hati, K. M., Mandal, K. G., Misra, A. K., Ghosh, P. K. and Bandyopadhyay, K. K. (2006). Effect of inorganic fertilizer and farmyard manure on soil physical properties, root distribution, and water-use efficiency of soybean in Vertisols of central India. Bioresource Technology 97: 2182–2188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirzel, J., Walter, I., Undurraga, I. and Cartagena, M. (2007). Residual effects of poultry litter on silage maize (Zea mays L.) growth and soil properties derived from volcanic ash. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 53: 480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1962). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Kaihura, F. B. S., Kullaya, I. K., Kilasara, M., Aune, J. B., Singh, B. R., Lal, R. and Arshad, M. A. (1999). Soil quality effects of accelerated erosion and management systems in three ecoregions of Tanzania. Soil & Tillage Research 53: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaliq, A., Abbasi, M. K. and Hussain, T. (2006). Effects of integrated use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources with effective microorganisms (EM) on seed cotton yield in Pakistan. Bioresourse Technology 97: 967–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, B. L., Dwyer, L. M. and Gregorich, E. G. (1999) Soil nitrogen amendment effects on seasonal nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen cycling in maize production. Agronomy Journal 91: 1003–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugwe, T. J., Mugendi, D., Kungu, J. and Muna, M. M. (2009). Maize yields response to application of organic and inorganic input under on-station and on-farm experiments in central Kenya. Experimental Agriculture 45: 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. and Riley, J. P. (1962) A modified single solution for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27: 35–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 539–577 (Eds Page, A. L., Miller, R H and Keeney, D. R.) American Society of Agronomy Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Nyiraneza, J. and Snapp, S. (2007) Integrated management of inorganic and organic nitrogen and efficiency in potato systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71: 1508–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. R., and Sommers, L. E. (1982). Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 403–430 (Eds Page, A. L., Miller, R H and Keeney, D. R.) American Society of Agronomy Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Palm, A. C., Gachengo, C. N., Delve, R. J., Cadisch, G. and Giller, K. E. (2001). Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: application of an organic resource database. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 83: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, D. D., Rao, A. S., Reddy, K. and Takkar, P. N. (1999). Yield sustainability and phosphorus utilization in soybean-wheat system on Vertisols in response to integrated use of manure and fertilizer phosphorus. Field Crops Research 62: 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttunde, H. F. W., Zerbini, E., Chandra, S. and Flower, D. J. (2001). Stover quality of dual-purpose sorghums: Genetic and environmental sources of variation. Field Crops Research 71: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangakkara, R., Attanayake, I. K. B. and Stamp, P. (2008). Impact of locally derived organic materials and method of addition on maize yields and nitrogen use efficiencies in major and minor seasons of tropical south Asia. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 39: 2584–2596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satyanarayana, V., Prasad, P. V. V., Murthy, V. R. K. and Boote, K. J. (2002). Influence of integrated use of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers on yield and yield components of irrigated lowland rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25: 2081–2090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepers, J. S., Franscis, D. D., Vigil, M. and Below, F. E. (1992). Comparison of corn leaf N concentration and chlorophyll meter readings. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 23:17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, A. R. and Mittra, B. N. (1988). Effect of combinations of organic materials and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of rice. Journal of Agriculture Science 111: 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, K. L., Neelaveni, K., Katyal, J. C., Srinivasa, A. S., Srinivas, K., Grace, J. K. and Madhavi, M. (2008). Effect of combined use of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on sunflower yield, soil fertility, and overall soil quality in rainfed Alfisol. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 39: 1791–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, R. R (1993) Ammonium acetate-extractable elements. in: Carter, M. R. (Ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 39–42. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Sims, J. T. and Wolf, D. C. (1994). Poultry waste management: Agricultural and environmental issues. Advances in Agronomy 52:2–83.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torri, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd ed.New York: McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Tewolde, H., Sistani, K. R. and Rowe, D. E. (2005). Broiler litter as a sole nutrient source for cotton: nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium concentrations in plant parts. Journal of Plant Nutrition: 28: 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanlauwe, B., Tittonell, P. and Mukalama, J. (2006). Within-farm soil fertility gradients affect response of maize to fertilizer application in western Kenya. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 76: 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, J. K., Chang, C., Clyton, G. W. and Carefoot, J. P. (2000). Cattle manure amendments can increase the pH of acid soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 962–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkleman, G. E., Amin, R., Rice, W. A. and Tahir, M. B. (1990). Methods Manual Soil Laboratory. BARD Project, PARC, Islamabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
Yi, Z. X., Wang, P., Zhang, H. F., Shen, L. X., Liu, M. and Dai, M. H. (2006). Effects of type and application rate of nitrogen fertilizer on source-sink relationship in summer maize in north China plain. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science 12: 294–300.Google Scholar
Zingore, S., Delve, R. J., Nyamangara, J. and Giller, K. E. (2008). Multiple benefits of manure: The key to maintenance of soil fertility and restoration of depleted sandy soils on African smallholder farms. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 80:267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar