Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:25:57.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADOPTION OF RICE VARIETIES. 2. ACCELERATING UPTAKE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2016

J. R. WITCOMBE ,
K. KHADKA ,
R. R. PURI ,
N. P. KHANAL ,
A. SAPKOTA  and
K. D. JOSHI
J. R. WITCOMBE*
Affiliation:
CAZS Natural Resources, Bangor University currently School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography (SENRGY), Bangor University, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
K. KHADKA
Affiliation:
Local Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development (LI-BIRD), P.O. Box 324, Pokhara, Nepal, currently National Wheat Research Programme, Nepal Agricultural Research council, Nepal
R. R. PURI
Affiliation:
Local Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development (LI-BIRD), P.O. Box 324, Pokhara, Nepal, currently National Wheat Research Programme, Nepal Agricultural Research council, Nepal
N. P. KHANAL
Affiliation:
Forum for Rural Welfare and Agricultural Reform for Development (FORWARD), Bharatpur, Nepal Currently CIMMYT South Asia Regional Office, P. O. Box 5186, Kathmandu, Nepal
A. SAPKOTA
Affiliation:
Forum for Rural Welfare and Agricultural Reform for Development (FORWARD), Bharatpur, Nepal
K. D. JOSHI
Affiliation:
CAZS Natural Resources, Bangor University c/o CIMMYT South Asia Regional Office, P. O. Box 5186, Kathmandu, currently CIMMYT Pakistan, CSI complex, NARC Park Road 44000, Islamabad, Pakistan
*
‡‡Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Plant breeding makes genetic gains over years, so growing newer varieties generally provides greater benefits than growing older ones. However, in low-altitude districts of Nepal, a few rice varieties covered 75% of the rice area and were more than 20 years old (first paper in this series). We test here if this slow rate of adoption of new varieties could be accelerated using a participatory method, Informal Research and Development (IRD), where packets of seeds of new rice varieties are widely distributed to many farmers. From 2008 to 2011, over 117 000 IRD packets were distributed in 18 districts of the Nepal Terai, including over 70 000 of three released varieties from a client-oriented breeding (COB) programme in Nepal. The IRD significantly increased the adoption of the three COB varieties. The benefits obtained by farmers in a single growing season equal the costs of IRD, if for every 75 kits distributed an additional 1 ha is grown. This assumes that the new varieties produce a 10% increase in yield (lower than that evidenced in their release proposals). On an average, fewer than three IRD kits were distributed for each hectare of a new variety grown by farmers in 2011. Furthermore, the effectiveness of IRD could be increased 1.2 to 2.7 fold (depending on the COB variety) if the IRD distribution were to be restricted to the region where the variety was most accepted. The best comparison of IRD with extension by the conventional system was their popularity compared with similar-aged varieties that had been promoted in the two systems. The adoption of three COB varieties was about twicethat of three varieties from the National Rice Research Programme (NRRP) that were closest in release date to the COB varieties. Unlike cost effectiveness assessed by hectares grown per IRD kit distributed, this comparison can only indicate efficacy because, as well as extension method, many factors influenced the adoption rates of the COB and NRRP varieties. The costs of IRD are small, both relative to the cost of breeding new varieties and to the benefits gained; so it is one of the simplest and most cost-effective interventions to increase agricultural productivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 627 - 643
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ghimire, R., Huang, W.-C. and Shrestha, R. B. (2015). Factors affecting adoption of improved rice varieties among rural farm households in Central Nepal. Rice Science 22:35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyawali, S., Joshi, K. D. and Witcombe, J. R. (2002). Participatory plant breeding in low-altitude production systems in Nepal. In Breeding Rainfed Rice for Drought-Prone Environments: Integrating Conventional and Participatory Plant Breeding in South and Southeast Asia. Proceedings of a DFID Plant Sciences Research Programme/IRRI Conference, 12-15 March 2002, IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 8–11 (Eds Witcombe, J. R., Parr, L. B. and Atlin, G. N.). Bangor and Manila: Department for International Development (DFID) Plant Sciences Research Programme, Centre for Arid Zone Studies (CAZS) and International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).Google Scholar
Joshi, A. and Witcombe, J. R. (1996). Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India. Experimental Agriculture 32:461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, K. D., Devkota, K. P., Harris, D., Khanal, N. P., Paudyal, B., Sapkota, A. and Witcombe, J. R. (2012). Participatory research approaches rapidly improve household food security in Nepal and identify policy changes required for institutionalisation. Field Crops Research 131:40–48.Google Scholar
Joshi, K. D., Musa, A. M., Johansen, C., Gyawali, S., Harris, D. and Witcombe, J. R. (2007). Highly client-oriented breeding, using local preferences and selection, produces widely adapted rice varieties. Field Crops Research 100:107–116.Google Scholar
Joshi, K. D. and Sthapit, B. R. (1990). Informal research and development (IRD): A new approach to research and extension. LARC Discussion Paper 1990/4. Pokhara, Nepal: Lumle Agriculture Research Centre.Google Scholar
Joshi, K. D., Subedi, M., Rana, R. B., Kadyat, K. B. and Sthapit, B. R. (1997). Enhancing on-farm varietal diversity through participatory varietal selection: A case study for Chaite rice in Nepal. Experimental Agriculture 33:335–334.Google Scholar
Joshi, K. D. and Witcombe, J. R. (2002). Participatory varietal selection in rice in Nepal - a comparison of two methods by farmer's selection and varietal adoption. Euphytica 127:445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillesø, J. B. L., Graudal, L., Moestrup, S., Kjær, E. D., Kindt, R., Mbora, A., Dawson, I., Muriuki, J., Ræbild, A. and Jamnadass, R. (2011). Innovation in input supply systems in smallholder agroforestry: Seed sources, supply chains and support systems. Agroforestry Systems 83:347–359.Google Scholar
NARC (2006). NARC Newsletter. Vol 13, No. 2. Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepal Agricultural Research Centre, p. 8.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. (2001). Seed Provisioning and Agricultural Development: The Institutions of Rural Change. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. (2006). The Case for Foundation Seed Enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Witcombe, J. R., Devkota, K. P. and Joshi, K. D. (2010). Linking community-based seed producers to markets for a sustainable seed supply system. Experimental Agriculture 46:425–437.Google Scholar
Witcombe, J. R., Gyawali, S., Subedi, M., Gyawali, S., Virk, D. S. and Joshi, K. D. (2013). Plant breeding can be made more efficient by having fewer, better crosses. BMC Plant Biology 13: 22.Google Scholar
Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, A., Joshi, K. D. and Sthapit, B. R. (1996). Farmer participatory crop improvement. I. Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Experimental Agriculture 32:445–460.Google Scholar
Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, K. D., Gyawali, S., Musa, A. M., Johansen, C., Virk, D. S. and Sthapit, B. R. (2005). Participatory plant breeding is better described as highly client-oriented plant breeding. I. Four indicators of client-orientation in plant breeding. Experimental Agriculture 41:299–319.Google Scholar
Witcombe, J. R. and Virk, D. S. (2001). Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding. Euphytica 122:451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Witcombe supplementary material

Supplementary Table

Download Witcombe supplementary material(File)
File 17.9 KB