Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Ryder, Jim
2001.
Identifying Science Understanding for Functional Scientific Literacy.
Studies in Science Education,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Frisch, A.-L.
Camerini, L.
Diviani, N.
and
Schulz, P. J.
2012.
Defining and measuring health literacy: how can we profit from other literacy domains?.
Health Promotion International,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
117.
Hochschild, Jennifer L.
and
Sen, Maya
2013.
Technology Optimism or Pessimism About Genomic Science: Social Scientists Versus the American Public.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Maleki, Khosro
2014.
Espace public et culture scientifique.
Sciences de la société,
p.
174.
Hochschild, Jennifer
and
Sen, Maya
2015.
Technology Optimism or Pessimism about Genomic Science.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
Vol. 658,
Issue. 1,
p.
236.
Lee, Myeong-Je
2015.
An Analysis of Fields and Scientific Literacy Content Elements of Scientific Reports in a Popular Portal Site in Korea.
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 3,
p.
338.
Berman, Elizabeth A.
and
Kuden, Jodee L.
2017.
Agriculture to Zoology.
p.
17.
Chalupa, Radek
and
Nesměrák, Karel
2018.
Analytical chemistry as a tool for suppressing chemophobia: an introduction to the 5E-principle.
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly,
Vol. 149,
Issue. 9,
p.
1527.
Čipková, Elena
Karolčík, Štefan
Sládková, Klára
and
Ušáková, Katarína
2018.
What is the level of scientific literacy among geography students studying bachelor's studies in natural sciences?.
International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
295.
Trench, Brian
2020.
Book review essay: Visible and invisible workings of science communication.
Public Understanding of Science,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 5,
p.
553.
Huxster, Joanna
Slater, Matthew
and
Landrum, Asheley
2020.
Understanding the Scientific Enterprise: Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Grasp of the Social Structure of Science.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Pols, Freek
2021.
What’s inside the pink box? A nature of science activity for teachers and students.
Physics Education,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 4,
p.
045004.
Devos, Flora
Jilet, Léa
Bouazza, Naïm
Foissac, Frantz
Tréluyer, Jean-Marc
Chappuy, Hélène
and
Ancel, Pierre-Yves
2021.
Identification and comparison of France to other countries of the teaching of research to nursing students: Results of an international survey of nursing educator.
Nurse Education Today,
Vol. 97,
Issue. ,
p.
104717.
Schiele, Bernard
Gascoigne, Toss
and
Schiele, Alexandre
2021.
Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring.
p.
3.
Chye, Samantha
Valappil, Ashika Chembila
Wright, David J.
Frank, Cornelia
Shearer, David A.
Tyler, Christopher J.
Diss, Ceri E.
Mian, Omar S.
Tillin, Neale A.
and
Bruton, Adam M.
2022.
The effects of combined action observation and motor imagery on corticospinal excitability and movement outcomes: Two meta-analyses.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,
Vol. 143,
Issue. ,
p.
104911.
Fahy, Declan
2022.
Ireland’s Covid-19 response: Perspectives from science communication.
Administration,
Vol. 70,
Issue. 3,
p.
141.
Bleiker, Johanna
2022.
Normen beim kooperativen Schreiben im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht – eine empirische Rekonstruktion.
Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik,
Vol. 2022,
Issue. 77,
p.
189.
Gu, Chao
and
Feng, Yi
2022.
Influence of Public Engagement with Science on Scientific Information Literacy During the COVID‑19 Pandemic.
Science & Education,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
619.
Canlas, Ian Phil
and
Molino-Magtolis, Joyce
2022.
Reflecting on the relevance of drawing as a tool in eliciting pre-service teachers’ preconceptions of human organs and organ systems.
Journal of Biological Education,
p.
1.
Sapia, Peppino
Napoli, Federica
and
Bozzo, Giacomo
2022.
The Lawson’s Test for Scientific Reasoning as a Predictor for University Formative Success: A Prospective Study.
Education Sciences,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 11,
p.
814.