Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:38:41.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The University as a Political Site: 1968 and Now

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2020

Suman Gupta
Suman Gupta*
Affiliation:
Department of English and Creative Writing, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton KeynesMK7 6AA, UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article offers a polemical comparison between conceptualizations of the University in the late 1960s and now. It has two main sections. The first and more substantial of these sections focuses on the left-wing student movements of the 1960s. These were underpinned by an understanding of the University as a political site: that is, an institutional formation and space structured by the ruling order. As such, the University was considered a locus of social contradictions, and could be occupied, extended and opened up, reformed, performed against the ruling order, and even abandoned or left behind. These different agendas are exemplified by drawing opportunistic lines from May 1968 in Paris to student movements in other contexts – Belgrade, Berlin, Berkeley, Tunis, Beijing, Kolkata – and back. A short section then comments on how the University has fared as a political site since. The entrenchment of managerialism, removal of policy-informing research to non-University centres, and dispersal of the University between material and digital spaces are some of the developments that are noted.

Type
Focus: May ’68 and Its Philosophers: Paris, Beijing, Ljubljana
Information
European Review , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2021 , pp. 725 - 737
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, RM (1965) The student rebellion at Berkeley: an interpretation. The Massachusetts Review 6(2), 353–365.Google Scholar
Amaral, A, Meek, VL and Larsen, IM (eds) (2003) The Higher Education Managerial Revolution. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchot, M (2010a) Letter to Ilija Bojović. In Blanchot, M, Political Writings, 1953–1993. Translated by Paul, Z. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 95–97.Google Scholar
Blanchot, M (2010b) [Exemplary acts.] In Blanchot, M, Political Writings, 1953–1993. Translated by Paul, Z. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 98–99.Google Scholar
Blanchot, M (2010c) [Letter to a representative of Yugoslav Radio-Television.] In Blanchot, M, Political Writings, 1953–1993. Translated by Paul, Z. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 82–84.Google Scholar
Bourg, J (2014) Principally contradiction: the flourishing of French Maoism. In Cook, AC (ed), Mao’s Little Red Book: A Global History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourges, H (ed.) (1968) The Student Revolt: The Activists Speak. London: Panther.Google Scholar
Chinese Communist Party (1966) Decision of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party Concerning the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Collini, S (2012) What Are Universities For? London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Crouzet, F (1969) A university besieged: Nanterre, 1967–69. Political Science Quarterly 84(2), 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daalder, H and Shils, E (eds) (1982) Universities, Politicians and Bureaucrats: Europe and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, R (2006) Towards the ‘new man’: revolutionary youth and rural agency in the Naxalite movement. Economic and Political Weekly 41(19), 1920–1927.Google Scholar
Daubier, J (1974) A History of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Translated by Seaver, R. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Debord, G (1964) Correspondance avec un cybernéticien. Internationale situationniste 9, 44–48.Google Scholar
Derrida, J (1992) Mochlos; or, the conflict of the faculties. In Rand, R (ed), Logomachia: The Conflict of Faculties. Translated by Rand, R and Wygant, A. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Duras, M (1990) 20 May 1968: descriptions of the birth of the Students-Writers Action Committee. In Duras, M, Green Eyes. Translated by Barko, C. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 53–62.Google Scholar
Dutschke, R and Waters, M-A (1968) Interview with Rudi Dutschke. Young Socialist 11(8), 11–16.Google Scholar
Esmein, J (1973) The Chinese Cultural Revolution. Translated by Jenner, WJF. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1991) Between ‘words’ and ‘things’ during May ’68. In Foucault, M, Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori. Translated by Goldstein, RJ and Cascaito, J. New York: Semiotext(e), pp. 131–146.Google Scholar
Frey, H (2004) Louis Malle. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gorz, A (1970) Détruire l’université. Les Temps Modernes 285, 1553–1558.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, B (2012) March 1968: practising transnational activism from Tunis to Paris. International Journal of Middle East Studies 44(4), 755–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, J (ed) (2012) Antiuniversity of London: Antihistory Tabloid. London: MayDay Rooms.Google Scholar
Jakovljević, B (2016) Alienation Effects: Performance and Self-Management in Yugoslavia, 1945–91. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (1979) The Conflict of the Faculties. Translated by Gregor, MJ. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Legrand, S (2009) Louis Althusser: mai 1968 et les fluctuations de l’idéologie. Actuel Marx 45, 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leys, S (1978) The Chairman’s New Clothes: Mao and the Cultural Revolution. Translated by Appleyard, C and Goode, P. New York: Allison and Busby.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J-F (1993) Nanterre, here, now. In Lyotard, J-F, Political Writings. Translated by Readings, B and Geiman, KP. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H (1964) One-Dimensional Man. New York: Beacon.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H (1970) The problem of violence and the radical opposition. In Marcuse, H, Five Lectures. Translated by Shapiro, JJ and Weber, SM. London: Allen Lane, pp. 83–108.Google Scholar
Mazumdar, C (1970) A few words to the revolutionary students and youths. Liberation 3(5), 13–14, 84–91.Google Scholar
Medien, K (2019) Foucault in Tunisia: the encounter with intolerable power. The Sociological Review. doi: 10.1177/0038026119870107 Google Scholar
Members of the Situationist International and Students of the University of Strassbourg (2000) On the Poverty of Student Life. Detroit: Black & Red.Google Scholar
Newman, JH (1873) The Idea of a University. London: Basil, Montagu Pickering.Google Scholar
Noble, DF (1998) Digital diploma mills, part 2: the coming battle over online instruction. October 86, 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M (1972) French university reform: renaissance or restoration? Comparative Education Review 16(2), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, F (1969) Birth of a Revolutionary Movement in Yugoslavia. Kalamazoo: Black & Red.Google Scholar
Search, A, Gupta, S, Durão, FA and McDonough, T (2017) Entrepreneurial Literary Theory. London: Shot in the Dark.Google Scholar
Seidman, M (2004) The Imaginary Revolution: Parisian Students and Workers in 1968. New York: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M (1978) Economy and Society, Vol. 1. Fischoff, E et al. (trans), Roth, G and Wittich, C (eds). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zedong, M (1974) Speech at Hangchow, 21 December 1965. In Schram, S (ed), Mao Tse-tung Unrehearsed, Talks and Letters: 1965–71. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 234–241.Google Scholar