1. By Turkish population in Europe, I simply refer to migrants from Turkey in Europe, irrespective of their ‘ethnic’ origin or identity. These migrants recruited through the bilateral agreements carried Turkish passports.Google Scholar

2.Amiraux, V. (2001) Acteurs de l'Islam entre Allemagne et Turquie: Parcours Militants et Expériences Religieuses (Paris: L'Harmattan).Google Scholar

3.Kastoryano, R. (2002) Negotiating Identities. States and Immigrants in France and Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4.Schiffauer, W., Baumann, G., Kastoryano, R. and Vertovec, S. (eds) (2004) Civil Enculturation: Nation-State, School and Ethnic Difference in the Netherlands, Britain, Germany and France (New York: Berghahn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5.Østergaard-Nielsen, E. (2010) Codevelopment and citizenship: the nexus between policies on local migrant incorporation and migrant transnational practices in Spain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), pp. 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6.van Bruinessen, M. (1997) ‘Aslını inkar eden haramzadedir!’ The debate on the ethnic identity of the Kurdish Alevis. Working paper, Centre for the Study of Asia & the Middle East, Deakin University, Malvern, Victoria (Australia). A revised version of this paper was published in: K. Kehl-Bodrogi, B. Kellner-Heinkele and A. Otter-Beaujean (eds) (1997) Syncretistic religious communities in the Near East (Leiden: Brill), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

7.Mandel, R. (1990) Shifting centres, emergent identities: Turkey and Germany in the lives of Turkish Gastarbeiter. In: F. Eickelman and J. Piscatori (eds) Muslim Travellers: Pilgrimage, Migration and the Religious Imagination (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 153–174.Google Scholar

8.Massicard, E. (2012) The Alevis in Turkey and Europe. Identity and managing territorial diversity (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9.Soekefeld, M. (2010) Struggling for recognition: the Alevi movement in Germany and in transnational space. Journal of International Migration and Integration/Revue de l'integration et de la migration internationale, 11(2), pp. 239–241.Google Scholar

10.Yalkut-Breddermann, B. (2001) Das Volk des Engel Pfau: die kurdischen Yeziden in Deutschland (Berlin: Das Arabische Buch).Google Scholar

11.Caglar, A. and Glick Schiller, N. (2011) Introduction: migrants and cities. In: N. Glick Schiller and A. Caglar (eds) Locating Migration: Rescaling Cities and Migrants (Ithaca: Cornell University), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

12.Glick Schiller, N. and Caglar, A. (eds) (2011) Locating Migration. Migrants and Cities (Ithaca: Cornel University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13.Glick Schiller, N. and Caglar, A. (2013) Locating migrant pathways of economic emplacement: thinking beyond the ethnic lens. Ethnicities, forthcoming.Google Scholar

14.Sassen, S. (1999) Cracked casings: notes towards an analytics for studying transnational processes. In: J. Abu-Lughod (ed.) Sociology for the Twenty First Century: continuities and Cutting Edges (Chicago: Chicago University Press), pp. 134–145.Google Scholar

15.Brenner, N. (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16.Caglar, A. (2006) Hometown associations, the rescaling of state spatiality and migrant grassroots transnationalism. Global Networks, 6(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17.Caglar, A. (2013) Locating migrant hometown ties in time and space. Locality as a blind spot of migration scholarship. Historische Anthropologie (Vienna, Cologne: Böhlau Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. For an elaboration of a comparative and global perspective on the location of migrants see N. Glick Schiller and A. Caglar (2009) Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), pp. 177–202; Glick Schiller, N. and Caglar, A. (eds) (2011) Locating Migration. Migrants and Cities (Ithaca: Cornel University Press).Google Scholar

19. Glick Schiller's work (even the earlier work) was an exception to this. Portes also incorporated the dynamics of capitalism into his analysis, however they still remained more or less within a national scale, without addressing the fracturing of state territoriality. See Portes, A. (1999) Globalization from below: the rise of transnational communities. In: D. Kalb et al. (eds) The Ends of Globalization: Bringing Society Back In (Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield), pp. 253–270.Google Scholar

20.Beck, U. (2000) The cosmopolitan perspective: sociology of the second age of modernity. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 79–105.Google Scholar

21.Wimmer, A. and Glick Schiller, N. (2002) Methodological nationalism and beyond nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22.Amelina, A., Nergiz, D., Faist, T. and Glick Schiller, N. (eds) (2012) Beyond Methodological Nationalism: Research Methodologies for Cross-Border Studies (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23.Vertovec, S. (1999) Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), pp. 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24.Glick Schiller, N., Caglar, A. and Guldbrandsen, T.C. (2006) Beyond the ethnic lens: locality, globality, and born-again incorporation. American Ethnologist, 33(4), pp. 612–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25.Glick Schiller, N. and Caglar, A. (2009) Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26. Kloosterman and Rath's work is an exception. However they also failed to link the varying opportunity structures in given cities (distinct from the ones at a national scale) systematically to a global perspective. See R. Kloosterman and J. Rath (1999) Mixed embeddedness, migrant entrepreneurship and informal economic activities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), pp. 253–267; Kloosterman, R. and Rath, J. (2001) Immigrant entrepreneurs in advanced economies. Mixed embeddedness further explored. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(2), pp. 189–202.Google Scholar

27.King, A. (ed.) (1991) Global Cities: Post-Imperialism and the Internationalization of London (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

28.Sassen, S. (1991) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

29.Sassen, S. (2000) Cities in a World Economy, 2nd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press).Google Scholar

30.Samers, M. (2002) Immigration and the global city hypothesis: towards an alternative research agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(2), 389–402.Google Scholar

31.Samers, M. (2011) The socioterritoriality of cities: a framework for understanding the incorporation of migrants in urban labor markets. In: N. Glick Schiller and A. Caglar (eds) Locating Migration: Rescaling Cities and Migrants (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), pp. 42–59.Google Scholar

32.Glick Schiller, N. (2011) Localized neoliberalism, multiculturalism and global religion: exploring the agency of migrants and city boosters. Economy and Society, 40(2), pp. 211–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. N. Brenner and N. Theodore (2002) Cities and geographies of actually existing neoliberalism, Antipode, 34(3), pp. 348–79; Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002) Cities and the geographies of actually existing neoliberalism. In: N. Brenner and N. Theodore (eds) Spaces of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 2–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34.Brenner, N. (1999) Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies, 36(3), pp. 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35.Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M. and MacLeod, G. (2003) Introduction: state space in question. In: N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones and G. MacLeod (eds) State/Space: A Reader (Malden, MA: Blackwell), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

36.Smith, N. (1995) Remaking scale: competition and cooperation in pre-national and post-national Europe. In: H. Eskelinen and S. Folke (eds) Competitive European Peripheries (Berlin: Springer Verlag), pp. 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37.Swyngedouw, E. (1997) Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In: K. Cox (ed.) Spaces of Globalisation. Reasserting the Power of the Local (New York, London), pp. 137–166.Google Scholar

38.Jessop, B. (2001) Globalisation, entrepreneurial cities and the global economy. In: P. Hamel, M. Lustig-Thaler and M. Mayer (eds) Urban Movements in a Globalizing World (London: Routledge), pp. 81–100.Google Scholar

39.Brenner, N. (2011) The urban question and the scale question: some conceptual Clarifications. In: N. Glick Schiller and A. Caglar (eds) Locating Migration: Rescaling Cities and Migrants (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), pp. 23–41.Google Scholar

40.Parts of this section are based on A. Caglar (2013) Locating migrant hometown ties in time and space. Locality as a blind spot of migration scholarship. Historische Anthropologie (Vienna, Cologne: Böhlau Verlag). I am using Syriacs to designate a group of migrants without suggesting an analysis of the dynamics of their settlement and transnational ties on the bases of their shared values, ethno-religious identity and/or culture. I refer these migrants as such, because they have been subject to hostilities in Mardin on the basis of being a Christian ‘Syriac’ minority and similarly they were interpellated into the urban repositioning struggle and into the UNESCO application as such.Google Scholar

41.Ayata, B. and Yukseker, D. (2005) A belated awakening: national and international responses to the internal displacement of Kurds in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 32, pp. 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42. For a more detailed account of this process see also Caglar, A. (2007) Rescaling cities, cultural diversity and transnationalism: migrants of Mardin and Essen. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), pp. 1070–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43. The Christian population in this region has fallen from 20% to 0.03% since the turn of the twentieth century.Google Scholar

44.Biner, Z.Ö. (2007) Retrieving the dignity of a cosmopolitan city: contested perspectives on rights, culture and ethnicity in Mardin. New Perspectives on Turkey, 37, pp. 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45.Biner, Z.Ö. (2007) Retrieving the dignity of a cosmopolitan city: contested perspectives on rights, culture and ethnicity in Mardin. New Perspectives on Turkey, 37, p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46.Biner, Z.Ö. (2011) Multiple imaginations of the state: understanding a mobile conflict on justice and accountability from the perspective of Assyrian-Syriac communities. Citizenship Studies, 15(3,4), pp. 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. The Archbishop's words are clear expression of this awareness. He said: ‘We should like to see Turkey in the EU to live better and practise our culture better. We, as Christian minorities have a great task in establishing ties with Turkey and the European Union’ – see Culpan, H. (2004) Turkey's ancient Christians seek to resettle villages. The Daily Star, June 2.Google Scholar

48.Cowan, J. (2009) Selective scrutiny: supranational engagement with minority protection and rights in Europe. In: F. Benda-Beckmann, K. Benda-Beckmann and A. Griffiths (eds) The Power of Law in a Transnational World: Anthropological Enquiries (Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books).Google Scholar

49.Caglar, A. (2007) Rescaling cities, cultural diversity and transnationalism: migrants of Mardin and Essen. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1070–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50. Through their Kafro hometown association and homeland oriented activities, the migrants from Mardin in Switzerland increasingly became involved in some church organizations there. The outcome of this new set of ties in Switzerland was a five-year project that aims to secure the return of Christian migrants from Mardin Province to Tur Abdin and involved several institutions based in Europe.Google Scholar

51. Such efforts to change the parameters of a place's connectedness is referred as ‘jumping scale’. See Swyngedouw, E. (1997) Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In: K. Cox (ed.) Spaces of Globalisation. Reasserting the Power of the Local (New York, London), pp. 137–166.Google Scholar