Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:02:11.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symmetry and Symmetry: The Notion of the Antique Term Symmetria before its New Definition in the Renaissance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Hans W. Hubert
Hans W. Hubert*
Affiliation:
Kunstgeschichtliches Institut der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Platz der Universität 3, 70985, Freiburg. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The word ‘symmetry’ expresses in everyday language the correspondence in form, size, and arrangement of parts on opposite sides of a plane, line, or point. Such a concept of correspondence is the main idea of most definitions of this term in the various humanities disciplines discussed in this volume of European Review. But if we go back to the Greek origins of this term, we discover that the understanding of symmetry was completely different, that it signified mathematical commensurability of all important elements of a three-dimensional figure. This article discusses the termʼs initial meaning and its importance for the design and appreciation of beautiful architectonic and human bodies. It goes on to provide an outline of the main phases of the step-by-step development from the original concept towards its modern meaning established in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 29 , Issue 2: Symmetry, Proportion and Seriality: The Semantics of Mirroring and Repetition in Science and the Arts , April 2021 , pp. 210 - 225
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, LB (1966) L’ Architettura (De re Aedificatoria): Testo Latino e Traduzione a Cura di Giovanni Orlandi, Vol. 1. Milan: Il Polifilo.Google Scholar
Blunt, A (1980) Art and Architecture in France: 1500–1700, 4th edn. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Borsi, F (1975) La Paysage de l’Industrie. Brussels: Archives d’Architecture Moderne.Google Scholar
Chitham, R (1985) The Classical Orders of Architecture. London: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Chitham, R (1987) Die Säulenordnungen der Antike und ihre Anwendung in der Architektur. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlag-Anstalt.Google Scholar
Da Vignola, GB (1736) Regola delli cinque ordini d’architettura. Bologna: Lelio dalla Volpe.Google Scholar
Dürer, A and Steck, M (eds) (1969) Vier Bücher von Menschlicher Proportion – Albrecht Dürer als Kunsttheoretiker. Zürich: Stocker/Schmid, Dietikon.Google Scholar
Fensterbusch, C (ed.) (1964) Vitruvii: De Architectura Libri Decem, 6th edn. Darmstadt: WBG Primus.Google Scholar
Galen, , De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis libri IX, lib. V.Google Scholar
Günther, H (1985) Gli ordini architettonici: rinascita o invenzione? Parte seconda. In Fagiolo, M (ed.), Roma e l’Antico nell’Arte e nella Cultura del Cinquecento, 2nd edn. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, pp. 272–310.Google Scholar
Günther, H (2009) Was ist Renaissance?: Eine Charakteristik der Architektur zu Beginn der Neuzeit, 1st edn. Darmstadt: WBG Primus.Google Scholar
Hahn, W (1989) Symmetrie als Entwicklungsprinzip in Natur und Kunst. Königstein: Langewiesche.Google Scholar
Herrmann, W (1973) The Theory of Claude Perrault, Vol 12. London: Zwemmer.Google Scholar
Herrmann, W (1976) ‘Walter Kambartel’: Symmetrie und Schönheit (book review). Architectura 6, 75–77, http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/toc/?PID=PPN522561411_0006.Google Scholar
Hon, G and Goldstein, BR (2008) From Summetria to Symmetry: The Making of a Revolutionary Scientific Concept. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, TN and Dewar, MJ (1999) Vitruvius: Ten Books on Architecture, 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N (1990) Schriftquellen zu Polyklet. In Beck, H (ed.), Polyklet: Der Bildhauer der Griechischen Klassik, Exhibition Catalogue Liebighaus, Museum Alter Plastik Frankfurt am Main. Mainz: von Zabern, pp. 48–78.Google Scholar
Kambartel, W (1972) Symmetrie und Schönheit: Über Mögliche Voraussetzungen des Neueren Kunstbewußtseins in der Architekturtheorie Claude Perraults. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Knell, H (2008) Vitruvs Architekturtheorie: Eine Einführung, 3rd edn. Darmstadt: WBG Academic.Google Scholar
Kruft, HW (1991) Geschichte der Architekturtheorie: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 3rd edn. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Le Muet, P (1623) Manière de Bastir pour Touttes Sortes de Personnes. Paris: Melchior Tauernier. Google Scholar
Lieb, S (2000) Was ist Jugendstil?: Eine Analyse der Jugendstilarchitektur 1890–1910. Darmstadt: WBG Primus.Google Scholar
Mayer, CO (2012) Institutionelle Mechanismen der Kanonbildung in der Académie Française: Die ‘Querelle des Anciens et des Modernes’ im Frankreich des 17. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nohl, H (1876) Index Vitruvianus. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Palagia, O and Politt, JJ (eds) (1996) Personal Styles in Greek Sculpture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palladio, A (1570) I Quattro Libri dell’Architettura. Venice: Dominico de’ Franceschi. Google Scholar
Perrault, C (1673) Les Dix Livres d’Architecture de Vitruve: Corrigez et Traduits Nouvellement en François, avec des Notes et des Figures. Paris: Coignard.Google Scholar
Perrault, C (1684) Les Dix Livres d’Architecture de Vitruve: Corrigez et Traduits Nouvellement en François, avec des Notes et des Figures, 2nd edn. Paris: Coignard.Google Scholar
Perrault, C (1967) Les Dix Livres d’Architecture de Vitruve: Traduction Intégrale de Claude Perrault (1673), Revue et Corrigée, sur les Textes Latins et Présentée par André Dalmas. Paris: Balland.Google Scholar
Perrault, C (1993) Ordonnance for the Five Kinds of Columns after the Method of the Ancients. Trans. McEwen, IK. Santa Monica: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.Google Scholar
Petzet, M (2000) Claude Perrault und die Architektur des Sonnenkönigs: Der Louvre König Ludwigs XIV. und das Werk Claude Perraults. München/Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag.Google Scholar
Rigault, H (1965) Histoire de la Querelle des Anciens et des Modernes. New York: Franklin Books (reprint of the 1856 edition).Google Scholar
Ritter, J and Gründer, K (eds) (1998) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Vol. 10. Basel: Schwabe. Google Scholar
Rommevaux, S, Vendrix, P and Zara, V (2012) Proportions: Science, Musique, Peinture et Architecture: Actes du LIe Colloque International d’Études Humanistes, 2008. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Savot, L (1624) L’Architecture Françoise des Bastimens Particuliers. Paris.Google Scholar
Scamozzi, V (1997) L’Idea dell’Architettura Universale. Venice: Expensis Autoris (reprint of the 1615 edition).Google Scholar
Serlio, S (1584) Tutte l’Opere d’Architettura, et Prospectiva, di Sebastiano Serlio, Bolognese …: Diviso in Sette Libri. Venice: Francesco de’ Franceschi. Google Scholar
Serlio, S (1619) Regole Generali di Architettura di Sebastiano Serlio Bolognese Sopra le Cinque Maniere de gli Edifici, Cioè, Thoscano, Dorico, Ionico, Corinthico, e Composito, con gli Essempi de l’Antiquita: Libro Quarto di Architettura. Venice: Francesco Marcolini da Forli. Google Scholar
Sulzer, JG (1994 [1792]) Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste, Vol. 2. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Thoenes, C (1985) Gli ordini architettonici: rinascita o invenzione? Parte prima. In Fagiolo, M (ed.), Roma e l’Antico nell’Arte e nella Cultura del Cinquecento. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, pp. 261–271.Google Scholar
Thoenes, C (2002) Opus Incertum: Italienische Studien aus Drei Jahrzehnten, Vol. 3. München, Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag.Google Scholar
Zöllner, F (1987) Vitruvs Proportionsfigur: Quellenkritische Studien zur Kunstliteratur im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Worms: Werner. Google Scholar
Zöllner, F (2009) Vitruvs Proportionsfigur: eine Metapher für Maß und Geometrie. In Johannes, R (ed.), Entwerfen: Architektenausbildung in Europa von Vitruv bis Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts; Geschichte, Theorie, Praxis. Hamburg: Junius, pp. 145–161.Google Scholar