Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:42:05.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Mobility Barriers for Roma: Discrimination and Informal Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2018

Pavel Ciaian  and
D’artis Kancs
Pavel Ciaian
Affiliation:
Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy. Email: [email protected]; d’[email protected]
D’artis Kancs
Affiliation:
Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy. Email: [email protected]; d’[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article attempts to identify and document social mobility barriers for Roma. We have identified two types of social mobility barriers: the cost of exit from the traditional Roma community, and the cost of entry into the mainstream society. Most of the existing policy and academic debate on the social and economic marginalisation of Roma has focused almost entirely on entry barriers. The main contribution of the current paper to the existing literature is to draw attention to exit barriers, which usually are neglected in the public debate and the academic literature. In the current paper we show that understanding both types of social mobility barriers for Roma is crucial for designing effective policy measures.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , October 2018 , pp. 670 - 685
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1.In the context of this paper, Europe means the EU-28 plus acceding and candidate countries. The current candidate countries are Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Turkey.Google Scholar
2. UNDP (2005) Faces of Poverty, Faces of Hope (United Nations Development Programme).Google Scholar
3. European Commission (2004) The Situation of Roma in an Enlarged European Union. Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs (Brussels: European Commission).Google Scholar
4. European Commission (2012) Discrimination in the EU in 2012. Special Eurobarometer 393 (Directorate-General Justice and Directorate-General for Communication, European Commission).Google Scholar
5. European Commission (2012) The situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States: survey results at a glance. Results of the UNDP/ World Bank/ European Commission regional Roma 2011 survey. Report prepared by FRA and UNDP (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).Google Scholar
6. European Commission (2012) Strategic Framework for Education and Training. European Commission (Brussels: European Commission).Google Scholar
7. Fraser, A. (1995) The Gypsies (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar
8. O’Higgins, N. and Ivanov, A. (2006) Education and employment opportunities for the Roma. Comparative Economic Studies, 48, pp. 6–19.Google Scholar
9. Creţan, R. and Turnock, D. (2009) The Gypsy minority in Romania: a study in marginality. Romanian. Journal of Geography, 53(1), pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
10. Kertesi, G. and Kezdi, G. (2011) Roma employment in Hungary after the post-communist transition. Economics of Transition, 19(3), pp. 563–610.Google Scholar
11. Cviklova, L. (2015) Direct and indirect racial discrimination of Roma people in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and the Russian Federation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(12), pp. 2140–2155.Google Scholar
12. Drydakis, N. (2012) Roma women in Athenian firms: do they face wage bias? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(12), pp. 2054–2074.Google Scholar
13. Kezdi, G. and Suranyi, E. (2009) A successful school integration program. An evaluation of the Hungarian National Government’s School Integration Program 2005–2007. Working paper No. 2 (Roma Education Fund).Google Scholar
14. Leeson, P.T. (2013) Gypsy law. Public Choice, 155, pp. 273–292.Google Scholar
15. Weyrauch, W.O. (Ed.) (2001) Gypsy Law: Romani Legal Traditions and Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
16. Greif, A. and Laitin, D.D. (2004) A theory of endogenous institutional change. American Political Science Review, 98(4), pp. 633–652.Google Scholar
17. Becker, G. (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
18. Arrow, K.J. (1972) Models of job discrimination. In A.H. Pascal (Ed.), Racial Discrimination in Economic Life (Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath), pp. 83–102.Google Scholar
19. Mudde, C. (2005) Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe (London and New York: Taylor & Francis).Google Scholar
20. Ram, M.H. (2014) Europeanized hypocrisy: Roma inclusion and exclusion in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 13(3), pp. 15–44.Google Scholar
21. Bernát, A., Juhász, A., Krekó, P. and Molnár, C. (2012) The roots of radicalism and anti-Roma attitudes on the far right. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
22. Phelps, E.S. (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62, pp. 659–661.Google Scholar
23. Arrow, K.J. (1998) What has economics to say about racial discrimination? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), pp. 91–100.Google Scholar
24. Kranton, R.E. and Minehart, D.F. (1997) Link patterns in buyer-seller networks: incentives and allocations in graphs. Working Paper (University of Maryland and Boston University).Google Scholar
25. Montgomery, J.D. (1991) Social networks and labour-market outcomes: toward an economic analysis. American Economic Review, 81(5), pp. 1407–1418.Google Scholar
26. Stiglitz, J.E. (1987) Principal and agent. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (Eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 1st edn (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp 966–971.Google Scholar
27. Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R. (2000) Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CVX(3), pp. 715–753.Google Scholar
28. Hancock, I. (1987) The Pariah Syndrome: An Account of Gypsy Slavery and Persecution (Ann Arbour, Michigan: Karoma Publishers).Google Scholar
29. Petrova, D. (2004) The Roma: between a myth and the future. European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC). http://www.errc.org/cikk.php?cikk=1844 Google Scholar
30. Uzunova, I. (2010) Roma integration in Europe: why minority rights are failing. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 27(1), pp. 283–323.Google Scholar
31. Campbell, D.T. (1965) Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Ed.). Symposium on Motivation (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press), pp. 283–311.Google Scholar
32. Sherif, M. (1966) In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company).Google Scholar
33. Jackson, J.W (1993) Realistic group conflict theory: a review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. Psychological Record, 43(3), pp. 395–415.Google Scholar
34. Sidanius, J. and Pratto, F. (1999) Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
35. Whitley, B.E. and Kite, M.E. (2010) The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination. Belmont (Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth).Google Scholar
36. Achim, V. (2004) The Roma in Romanian History (Budapest: Central European University Press).Google Scholar
37. Holocaust Encyclopedia (2016) Genocide of European Roma (Gypsies), 1939-1945. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM).Google Scholar
38. Hancock, I. (2005) True Romanies and the Holocaust: a re-evaluation and an overview. In The Historiography of the Holocaust (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 383–396.Google Scholar
39. Ringold, D., Orenstein, M.A. and Wilkens, E. (2005) Roma in an Expanding Europe: Breaking the Poverty Cycle (Washington: World Bank)Google Scholar
40. Agarin, T. (2014) When Stereotype Meets Prejudice: Antiziganism in European Societies (Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag).Google Scholar
41. Marinaro, I.C. (2009) Between surveillance and exile: biopolitics and the Roma in Italy. Bulletin of Italian Politics, 1(2), pp. 265–287.Google Scholar
42. Korando, A.M. (2012) Roma go home: the plight of European Roma. Law and Inequality, 30(1), pp. 125–147.Google Scholar
43. Parker, O. (2012) Roma and the politics of EU citizenship in France: everyday security and resistance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(3), pp. 475–491.Google Scholar
44. Pettigrew, T.F. (1998) Reactions toward the new minorities of Western Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp. 77–103.Google Scholar
45. Rydgren, J. (2005) Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family. European Journal of Political Research, 44(3), pp. 413–437.Google Scholar
46. Halasz, K. (2009) The rise of the radical right in Europe and the case of Hungary: ‘Gypsy crime’ defines national identity? Development, 52(4), pp. 490–494.Google Scholar
47. Stewart, M. (2012) The Gypsy Menace: Populism and the new Anti-Gypsy Politics (London: Hurst).Google Scholar
48. Greif, A. (2004) Self-enforcing institutions: comparative and historical institutional analysis. Paper presented in European School on New Institutional Economics (ESNIE).Google Scholar
49. Aoki, M. (2007) Endogenising institutions and institutional changes. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(1), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
50. Myerson, R. (2004) Justice, institutions, and multiple equilibria. Chicago Journal of International Law, 5, pp. 91–107.Google Scholar
51.The belief system of the Roma varies from country to country and community to community, but many beliefs are common and vary only in the degree in which they are observed or applied.Google Scholar
52. McLaughlin, J.B. (1980) Gypsy Lifestyles (Toronto: Lexington Books).Google Scholar
53. Okely, J. (1983) The Traveller-Gypsies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
54.P. Ciaian and D. Kancs (2019) Marginalisation of Roma: root causes and possible policy actions. European Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
55.P. Ciaian and D. Kancs (2018) Long-run economic, budgetary and fiscal effects of Roma integration policies. JRC Technical Report (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).Google Scholar
56. Ciaian, P. and Kancs, D. (2016) Causes of the social and economic marginalisation: the role of social mobility barriers for Roma. JRC Technical Report No. 27794 (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).Google Scholar